Quote: "By submitting a game we lose all exclusive rights to reproduce, distribute, perform, display, sell, lend or rent our work."
Yet again, no, you do not. You can distribute it (i.e. put it on your own site for download, that is distribution is it not?), you can "perform" it (whatever the hell that is), you can display it, you can sell it, lend it, rent it, do whatever you want with it.
Not a single one of those things has been "lost" and I challenge you to prove otherwise (without resorting to a dictionary ideally, try reading the rules, try reading my posts, try looking at what happened in the last compo).
Where is the rule that says "you cannot sell your game, you cannot lend it out, you canot distribute it" ? Mmmm?
Quote: "So yes, we will be handing over ALL copyrights (the parts that matter anyway)."
You cannot say you will hand of ALL copyrights and then in the same sentance say "well, only the parts that matter". Sorry but that's a complete contradiction.
Quote: "Oh and yes our game will be published. As defined by dictionary.com. I know quoting dictionary.com makes me sound like a stuck up smartass, but ya know. "
If you want to get that pedantic, then according to dictionary.com - just mentioning the name of your game in a forum message is "publishing" it (Syn: To proclaim; publish; make known). So hey... watch me publish Half-Life 5.. see, I've just done it
Quote: "Sure were not PROHBITED from selling or distribution our software on our own, but come on, you know just as I do, there is no point after you start handing it out for free."
You think so? Didn't stop people doing it last time. But that's not a good enough example is it.. I mean, people who actually did just that. Hands up those still reading this (and I do pity you) who wouldn't love to see an update to say Bamberman? Personally even I'd pay a few dollars for an updated version of that. But of course you're stopped from doing this by signing a pact with the copyright devil
Cheers,
Rich
"Gentlemen, we have short-circuited the Universe!"