Ok I think this thread is due for an update.
Quote: "Today i stumbled upon this amazing software which i knew little of."
You stumbled upon the best game engine in the world.
Quote: "It's better than X9 in almost every way (with the exception of headshots and multiple textures)"
X10 now supports multiple textures and will support headshots after migration.
Quote: "x10 = No(t much) support"
Get dowloading the v109 beta. It fixes a lot of bugs, especially for ATI users.
Quote: "X10 has better graphics, but it can only use a few of the model packs (so far), and does not have near as much support as X9"
The finished v109 will support all model packs. Many are now supported.
Quote: "X10 has many great new features, but if you make a game in X10 you restrict the computers that can play your game to only people with vista"
X10 is being updated so built games can be played on XP / DX9 but without all of the effects.
Quote: "If i Own both Versions, would i be able to load the older version games. in order to provide the same game in both versions. so that people with Vista and higher specs, can have a better experiance."
FPSC X9 games work on Vista no problems.
Quote: "I would go with classic (x9), it's more supported, not to mention they're still multiple bugs with x10, not to mention not as many have x10 supporting graphics card, and many stay away from Vista all together"
Then they should try googling 'dual booting' and entry level DX10 cards for around $60.
Quote: "I recommend keeping x9 and wait for the X10 Migration, as FPSC X10 will be pretty obsolete by then (what's the point in releasing it?)"
I had to take a deep breath after reading that one. FPSC X10 obsolete! so where does that leave X9 then?. At what point in time do you see 50 enemies on screen being possible in X9 with no lag?. Did full scene environment shaders get implemented into X9 already? LOL. Etc
I think some of you need to go back and read whats actually been confirmed for X9 in the migration because it aint gona be X10.