Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

3 Dimensional Chat / A big mining thingy

Author
Message
Toasty Fresh
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Jun 2007
Location: In my office, making poly-eating models.
Posted: 31st Jan 2009 11:35 Edited at: 31st Jan 2009 11:43
Link
Yes, another annoying recreational model by Toasty that will never get used.

I just recently got a HD 4870 with dual screen support, so what better way to test it than doing some modeling?

I've honestly got no fudging idea what this bad boy is exactly, but I like it. I just know it's got caterpillar tracks and it's big. I recently watched Wall-E and was inspired to make something with caterpillar tracks.

Enough talk, here's some screens.






You want a wireframe? You asked for it.



25621 faces.
Back to top
Profile PM Email
petsall
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 25th Apr 2008
Location: Finland
Posted: 31st Jan 2009 11:43
Link
Cool work toasty

music is like candy - you throw away the rappers - Oppositing force
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Toasty Fresh
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Jun 2007
Location: In my office, making poly-eating models.
Posted: 31st Jan 2009 11:47
Link
Thanks.
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Alucard94
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Jul 2007
Location: Stockholm, Sweden.
Posted: 31st Jan 2009 12:39
Link
Even though you didn't care about poly count the cylinders on those tracks are overkill, you could get the same look without all those divisions.


Alucard94, the member of the future of the past.
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Errant AI
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Aug 2006
Location:
Posted: 31st Jan 2009 12:55
Link
Looks sweet, man. Like a chibi 40K land raider
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Toasty Fresh
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Jun 2007
Location: In my office, making poly-eating models.
Posted: 31st Jan 2009 12:59 Edited at: 31st Jan 2009 13:01
Link
Quote: "Even though you didn't care about poly count the cylinders on those tracks are overkill, you could get the same look without all those divisions."


True. If it weren't for the fact that it's recreational, I of course would have changed it. But seeing as it is recreational, I pretty much just made almost everything about it high-poly.

EDIT: Thanks, Errant, it means a lot coming from the likes of you.
Back to top
Profile PM Email
AndrewT
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 11th Feb 2007
Location: MI, USA
Posted: 31st Jan 2009 19:31
Link
Lookin' good, I would say you could add a little detail to the back of it, the part visible in the 3rd render. Also not sure what app you're using, but the ao is making it a little too dark and fuzzy, try upping the samples and lighting if possible.

Back to top
Profile PM
Toasty Fresh
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Jun 2007
Location: In my office, making poly-eating models.
Posted: 31st Jan 2009 23:54
Link
I agree with you on the detail bit. It doesn't have as much mechanical bits 'n pieces as the rest.

I don't exactly agree with you on the AO bit, though. I dunno why, bit I like it in that grainy-ish style. But I'll post some more renders anyway.

Here you go.


Here's some screens of the detail I attempted to put into the track wheels.



Back to top
Profile PM Email
CoffeeGrunt
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Oct 2007
Location: England
Posted: 1st Feb 2009 01:07
Link
Try using set smooth, the divisions are quite obvious...

"Give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day. Give a man a fishing rod, and he'll break it up into firewood...or swap it for a fish."
-Frankie Boyle, on Mock the Week
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Toasty Fresh
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Jun 2007
Location: In my office, making poly-eating models.
Posted: 1st Feb 2009 01:29
Link
I used smoothing groups as much as I could, but on some parts it looked like garbage...
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Alucard94
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Jul 2007
Location: Stockholm, Sweden.
Posted: 1st Feb 2009 09:48
Link
Quote: "I used smoothing groups as much as I could, but on some parts it looked like garbage...
"

Stop saying that.

That's where you need to smooth the normals.


Alucard94, the member of the future of the past.
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Toasty Fresh
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Jun 2007
Location: In my office, making poly-eating models.
Posted: 1st Feb 2009 10:27
Link


Please don't say I didn't warn you...
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Alucard94
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Jul 2007
Location: Stockholm, Sweden.
Posted: 1st Feb 2009 10:35
Link
Quote: "Please don't say I didn't warn you..."

Why would I?

And that doesn't look normal, could you post a shaded wireframe shot of that part?


Alucard94, the member of the future of the past.
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Crav3
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th Oct 2008
Location: Down Under
Posted: 1st Feb 2009 10:41
Link
It's Because you didn't change the values. Your meant to change them with each connect poly area to ensure smoothing groups are perfect.

Back to top
Profile PM
Toasty Fresh
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Jun 2007
Location: In my office, making poly-eating models.
Posted: 1st Feb 2009 10:55
Link
Quote: "It's Because you didn't change the values. Your meant to change them with each connect poly area to ensure smoothing groups are perfect."


Ahhhh...

You learn something new every day.
Back to top
Profile PM Email
tjaabee
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th Apr 2007
Location: somewhere
Posted: 1st Feb 2009 12:30
Link
Ahh... (Quoted from Toasty ) I like that. Even though it's got that massive, bloody, overkill polycount. Wall-E's a good movie BTW. Have one:

Greetz.

Yor mod has been erased by a signature. (Oops... something is wrong)
Back to top
Profile PM
CoffeeGrunt
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Oct 2007
Location: England
Posted: 1st Feb 2009 13:12
Link
Go into Edit Mode and check the normals, sometimes Blender makes them backwards, especially if you're using Booleans...

"Give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day. Give a man a fishing rod, and he'll break it up into firewood...or swap it for a fish."
-Frankie Boyle, on Mock the Week
Back to top
Profile PM Email
PW Productions
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 13th Mar 2009
Location: sitting in a chair.
Posted: 6th Apr 2009 06:22
Link
What did you use to make it? Like AC3D, World Studio, etc.

Nothing is too hard as long as you can achieve it (*Note* This does not apply to programmers).
-www.pwproductions.webs.com- Visit the new forum!!
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Sid Sinister
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Jul 2005
Location:
Posted: 6th Apr 2009 07:57
Link
Quality

"If I have seen a little further it is by standing on the shoulders of Giants" - Isaac Newton
-Degrees: Computer Animation-
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Back to top

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2024-11-25 05:55:03
Your offset time is: 2024-11-25 05:55:03