Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

Dark GDK / Source Code Is Fredom Of Speech

Author
Message
Funkbrotha10
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 2nd May 2009
Location:
Posted: 4th May 2009 08:01
source code is classified under freedom of speech.

Therefor if someone wanted to sell their game by giving out the source code they could do that EVEN WITHOUT the nessicary liscense
just thought you should know...I am a lawyer

it was once said that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could re-produce the works of shakespear...
Now thanks to the internet we know that that is not true
go2none
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Oct 2008
Location: London
Posted: 4th May 2009 12:26 Edited at: 4th May 2009 12:26
Could you elaborate on
Quote: "to sell their game by giving out the source code"
Aren't sell and give out contradictory?
prasoc
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Oct 2008
Location:
Posted: 4th May 2009 13:01
Quote: "I am a lawyer"


I think you misspelt it: its IANAL (I am not a lawyer)
IanM
Retired Moderator
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 11th Sep 2002
Location: In my moon base
Posted: 4th May 2009 16:32
Quote: "Aren't sell and give out contradictory? "

No.

There are games where the client is free for download, and even the full game is playable up to a point.

There are systems for sale where the source code itself is given away, but the support is sold (MySQL for example), or where you can sponsor development (Apache), or where content is sold (Quake series - the code is now GPL for Quake 1 to 3, but you have to buy to get the game content).

To say that sell & give out/away are contradictory shows that you haven't thought about it enough.

Quote: "its IANAL (I am not a lawyer)"

I suspect you may be right
I'd never expect to hear anything so simplistic said by a lawyer, especially seeing as the statement is missing the crucial (and probably the most important) part

CuCuMBeR
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 11th Jan 2003
Location: Turkey
Posted: 4th May 2009 16:37
Quote: "I'd never expect to hear anything so simplistic said by a lawyer"


Actually, it is unrealistic because you can not get a word (of advice) out of a lawyers mouth without paying for it.

There is always one more imbecile than you counted on.

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2024-10-01 01:26:50
Your offset time is: 2024-10-01 01:26:50