Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

Geek Culture / If you could redesign your OS of choice's UI, how would it work?

Author
Message
NeX the Fairly Fast Ferret
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Apr 2005
Location: The Fifth Plane of Oblivion
Posted: 1st Jul 2009 03:00 Edited at: 1st Jul 2009 03:00
I've used a lot of UIs in my time and they all have their advantages and disadvantages and I've made mental notes over the years until a few minutes in Swish yielded this:



If you could make something in your OS's UI work differently or if you could completely reinvent it, what would you do? (as in functionality, not styling)

Attachments

Login to view attachments
Coach Shogun 20
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 27th Feb 2009
Location: In your mind, messing with your thoughts
Posted: 1st Jul 2009 03:46
For Vista, I would remove the start bar. Everything would be accessed from the keyboard, using hotkeys. (alt+TAB for changing windows, the windows button, etc.) I can't imagine that being practical for most people though.

Robert F
User Banned
Posted: 1st Jul 2009 04:30
Quote: "For Vista, I would remove the start bar. Everything would be accessed from the keyboard, using hotkeys. (alt+TAB for changing windows, the windows button, etc.) I can't imagine that being practical for most people though."


lol, I would die. I have used Windows 7 and what I would redesign in it is the task bar. I hate the new one. its just ugh.


Anything is Possible!
Agent Dink
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Mar 2004
Location:
Posted: 1st Jul 2009 04:48 Edited at: 1st Jul 2009 04:50
I would allow for fully customizable placement of 'start'/ custom menu buttons, docks, and widgets and orient the OS around that functionality allowing users to create fast and integrated additions to the main UI.

Aditionally I would allow the user to set a custom screen area for maximized windows if they choose not to utilize the full monitor. Window snapping and a tiling feature with presets as well as custom layouts would be standard. Most of these controls would be in the titlebar for the window and if someone doesn't need a certain feature they can optionally hide any aspect of the non-essentials in OS.

My OS would be all about workflow and multitasking. No OS really quite cuts it without dual monitors and plenty of addons.

I would also probably implement a hot spot feature to the OS as well such as drag the mouse to the bottom right corner and 'user defined action' occurs, perhaps bringing up a clock or calender for instance.

Everything should be fluid.

Visually it would be open to any sort of customization, most likely similar to Vista in that you can choose any color for your skin, but also new user made skins readily available without hacks or extra programs.

MISoft Studios - Silver-Dawn Gorilda is lost!

Yodaman Jer
User Banned
Posted: 1st Jul 2009 05:38
Agent Dink, I would buy your OS in a heartbeat!


Click to go to our website!
Agent Dink
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Mar 2004
Location:
Posted: 1st Jul 2009 05:54
Why thank you

MISoft Studios - Silver-Dawn Gorilda is lost!

Robert F
User Banned
Posted: 1st Jul 2009 09:04
Quote: "No OS really quite cuts it without dual monitors and plenty of addons."


Why do you need TWO monitors?


Anything is Possible!
Jeku
Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posted: 1st Jul 2009 09:09
Quote: "Why do you need TWO monitors?"


Once you use it it's hard to go back to one

Agent Dink
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Mar 2004
Location:
Posted: 1st Jul 2009 13:38
I have a 23.6 inch and a 22 inch monitor side by side. It's amazing. I'll never go back to anything smaller.

MISoft Studios - Silver-Dawn Gorilda is lost!

Mr Z
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 27th Oct 2007
Location:
Posted: 1st Jul 2009 13:51
I would make so that the user can modify the UI themselves. That is all I can think of now.

There is no greater virtue, then the ability to face oneself.
Roxas
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 11th Nov 2005
Location: http://forum.thegamecreators.com
Posted: 1st Jul 2009 15:30 Edited at: 1st Jul 2009 15:31
Quote: "I would allow for fully customizable placement of 'start'/ custom menu buttons, docks, and widgets and orient the OS around that functionality allowing users to create fast and integrated additions to the main UI.

Aditionally I would allow the user to set a custom screen area for maximized windows if they choose not to utilize the full monitor. Window snapping and a tiling feature with presets as well as custom layouts would be standard. Most of these controls would be in the titlebar for the window and if someone doesn't need a certain feature they can optionally hide any aspect of the non-essentials in OS.

My OS would be all about workflow and multitasking. No OS really quite cuts it without dual monitors and plenty of addons.

I would also probably implement a hot spot feature to the OS as well such as drag the mouse to the bottom right corner and 'user defined action' occurs, perhaps bringing up a clock or calender for instance.

Everything should be fluid.

Visually it would be open to any sort of customization, most likely similar to Vista in that you can choose any color for your skin, but also new user made skins readily available without hacks or extra programs."


I hate to say this, but many Linux distros can do this because of the Freedom they allow to user.

As for me, i can't think of anything Ubuntu gives me everything i ever wanted. It would be nice to see something like Altmit OS from .HACK//GU most of Altmit OS recreation project looks just boring. Or this the OS would be horrible, but the idea is cool nevertheless .

Agent Dink
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Mar 2004
Location:
Posted: 1st Jul 2009 15:56
Yes, Roxas, but can you run Photoshop without emulators?

MISoft Studios - Silver-Dawn Gorilda is lost!

NeX the Fairly Fast Ferret
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Apr 2005
Location: The Fifth Plane of Oblivion
Posted: 1st Jul 2009 16:08
Well, it's not an emulator, it's an API layer...

Roxas
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 11th Nov 2005
Location: http://forum.thegamecreators.com
Posted: 1st Jul 2009 16:49 Edited at: 1st Jul 2009 16:50
Quote: "Yes, Roxas, but can you run Photoshop without emulators?"

Wine stands for Wine is not a emulator. It translates Windows api calls to Linux calls and DirectX Calls to OpenGL calls.
You can even install Wined3d wrapper to Windows XP and replace your DirectX With OpenGL. And the cool thing is that Wine is getting DX10 support so you
could play DX10 games on Windows XP when it grows good as DX9/8 Support.

And yes Photoshop works really good under Wine. But i prefer Gimp.
There is lots of better Free alternatives for Linux than bloated software for Windows. But there is also lots of Programs that Linux lags. Thats where Wine comes handy.

JLMoondog
Moderator
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Jan 2009
Location: Paradox
Posted: 1st Jul 2009 16:56
Mine would be controlled with my mind! No more keyboards or mouses(is the plural form of a computer mouse 'mice'? ). The OS would just be a reflection of what I'm thinking and or feeling. With simple access to programs and features you'd normally find in an OS.

monotonic
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Mar 2006
Location: Nottinghamshire, England
Posted: 4th Jul 2009 00:49
I've always liked the idea of an FPS style 3D interface, where drives are represented by rooms and directories are boxes/chests stacked on shelfs and files will be PDA like objects. If you wanted to delete a file or directory you would pick it up, walk over to the bin and drop it in or to move a file physically pick it up and walk into another room and put it there. You could have little helper terminals or robots that you cam tell to search for files and they bring it to you. Of course this is very impractical and would become annoying as soon as the novelty wore off, but hey in my little world it sounds fun.

01100001 01101110 01101111 01110100 01101000 01100101 01110010
01110000 01101111 01101001 01101110 01110100 01101100 01100101 01110011
01110011 01110011 01101001 01100111
NeX the Fairly Fast Ferret
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Apr 2005
Location: The Fifth Plane of Oblivion
Posted: 4th Jul 2009 00:52
Quote: "The OS would just be a reflection of what I'm thinking and or feeling."


Which would be great until you start thinking of some girlfriend you had years back and in your daydream she appears onscreen. Not necessarily dressed.

JLMoondog
Moderator
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Jan 2009
Location: Paradox
Posted: 4th Jul 2009 00:54
monotonic:
Like Jurasic Park? The hacking scene was so embarrassing to watch.

Agent Dink
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Mar 2004
Location:
Posted: 4th Jul 2009 01:16
@Monotonic There's no reason you couldn't make this in DBP... just for fun...

MISoft Studios - Silver-Dawn Gorilda is lost!

tha_rami
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 25th Mar 2006
Location: Netherlands
Posted: 4th Jul 2009 02:31
It would work, that's all I need.


A mod has been erased by your signature because it was larger than 600x120
Inspire
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 23rd Dec 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Posted: 4th Jul 2009 04:22
I love Mac at the moment. I can't see any way to change it...not just being a fanboy, I really can't think of a way. Maybe just making every part of it skinnable...that would be fun, I'm sick of having to download software to skin my OS's.
NeX the Fairly Fast Ferret
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Apr 2005
Location: The Fifth Plane of Oblivion
Posted: 4th Jul 2009 13:13
So the lack of an ability to resize from places other than the lower right corner of a window and the Dock putting running app icons next to one-click shortcuts to launch others with little differentiation (they could desaturate them, or make running apps bigger, or SOMETHING) aren't bad design?

Seppuku Arts
Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Aug 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posted: 4th Jul 2009 15:03
Quote: "Mine would be controlled with my mind!"


I'm just thinking, what if I was doing to some work on my laptop in a coffee shop and an attractive lady walks past, how would the computer react to my arousing thoughts?

monotonic
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Mar 2006
Location: Nottinghamshire, England
Posted: 4th Jul 2009 16:14
Quote: "Like Jurasic Park? The hacking scene was so embarrassing to watch."


lol yeah, do you remember the scene(s) in Hackers, at the beginning Zero Cool/Crash Override was hacking that T.V station and there was lightning bolts, radiation signs, skulls and various other things scrolling around the screen while he was typing like crazy.


Quote: "There's no reason you couldn't make this in DBP... just for fun..."


I've thought about doing it before, making it all procedural so that the surrounding change as you alter files/directories.


Quote: "I'm just thinking, what if I was doing to some work on my laptop in a coffee shop and an attractive lady walks past, how would the computer react to my arousing thoughts?"


Most probably the computer would start mincing it's words and stuttering, then the mouse cursor would grow at a very inappropriate time causing embarrassment and ultimately screwing your chances of getting with said women.

01100001 01101110 01101111 01110100 01101000 01100101 01110010
01110000 01101111 01101001 01101110 01110100 01101100 01100101 01110011
01110011 01110011 01101001 01100111
Jeff032
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 13th Aug 2007
Location:
Posted: 4th Jul 2009 16:48
It would have built in virtualization, like Altiris SVS (except flawless, because it would be built in).

So each program would be installed in its own 'layer', where it is able to write files etc without actually changing the base os. The user could rollback the layer - undoing all changes made to that layer since installation, or delete the layer - completely removing the program and all changes made by it from the system.

I'm not sure I explained that very well though.

Mr Z
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 27th Oct 2007
Location:
Posted: 4th Jul 2009 18:11 Edited at: 4th Jul 2009 18:13
Quote: "It would have built in virtualization, like Altiris SVS (except flawless, because it would be built in).

So each program would be installed in its own 'layer', where it is able to write files etc without actually changing the base os. The user could rollback the layer - undoing all changes made to that layer since installation, or delete the layer - completely removing the program and all changes made by it from the system.

I'm not sure I explained that very well though."


We are talking UI design, not OS design . Think you may find this interesting:
http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/groups/os/singularity/

It sounds similar to what you mean to me at last .

There is no greater virtue, then the ability to face oneself.

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2025-06-08 01:53:28
Your offset time is: 2025-06-08 01:53:28