Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

Geek Culture / The new "Issues with this forum" thread

Author
Message
QuothTheRaven
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 2nd Oct 2002
Location: United States
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 05:21 Edited at: 28th Sep 2009 05:22
In my last post I noted many issues with these forums that could be improved. I was ragingly drunk at the time, and frankly I view the structure and clarity of that thread as a grand achievement. The problem of course is it came with a nasty tone. But all of the points I made were 100% valid, and I stand by them. So here is a compiled version from that thread without the sass.

Even if you think some of these issues are insignificant, I guarantee you from experience that they aren't. These issues are what stand between these forums and a good, usable interface.

These issues are in no particular order:

1. Signatures are hard coded into forum posts
If I change my signature, the change needs to propagate to every single post on the forums. This is what the user expects to happen based on the contract of a forum. It's also a potential security issue, what if a newcomer puts in their name or phone number, and then tries to edit it? It won't go away!

2. There no pagination, just a dropdown of pages
Pagination is a good thing. It's an accepted, standard, useful thing. A dropdown does not compare.

3. Email addresses are in plain text
As mentioned before, this is a huge security problem. You're putting the email addresses of people online. You know why this is bad. And don't think that bots are the only things that harvest email addresses. This forum NEEDS a system like a form that sends an email to the person, but never exposes the email address. This is how all other forums do it, because just putting a regular mailto link is a joke.

4. Links are not automatically hyperlinked in posts
There are many threads that are ruined because links aren't automatically hyperlinked. http://google.com <- That should be a link. No questions asked.

5. There is no preview post function
Did you know that on some forums, you can't even make a new post without going to the preview screen? This improves the quality of posts on a forum. It lets you know if your images are working and linked properly. It means you don't have to edit your post a million times to fix something.

6. No ability to sort table column headers
This is a feature of vBulletin and other forums, and it's very nice. See the most viewed thread? No problem! See the thread with the most replies? Simple! Unless you're really messing up your SQL syntax, this should be a simple order by clause.

7. The code tag is a joke. Plain and simple
Some people have said it's nice not to see a huge block of code, and the expanding box helps hide it. Of course it does, but it's a poor display mechanism. Look at other code tag models. Most put it in a div with a fixed height and a scrollbar. That way it doesn't take up a huge amount of horizontal real estate, but it also lets you SEE something without having to DO anything. And ALL CODE TAGS COLORIZE THE CODE. You MUST colorize your code tags. That's why people don't code in NOTEPAD anymore.

8. The "Top" link at the bottom of each page REFRESHES the page. AND the "link" for each post REFRESHES the page.
You know it shouldn't do that. Come on guys. Who made that?! Please read up on how to use anchor tags properly.

9. No auto-generation of thumbnails for uploaded images
This is a supremely useful feature of all forum upload tools (see PHPBB, vBulletin). I highly suggest you add this.

10. The link tag is broken.
It cuts off links when it shouldn't. If pressed, I will find an example. But manually adding a link tag around certain links will cut off the link too early, breaking the link.

11. The "toggle post" button is a joke, and should be replaced with a modern stylesheet
On any other forum software, the style is set up such that if a huge, gigantic image is posted, it won't stretch all the other posts. This is a relatively simple thing to do. Of course these forums would have to be re-marked up, because of the ancient all-table markup they currently use

12. The quote feature is unintuitive and doesn't show authorship
It makes no sense that you have to scroll up, highlight text, scroll down, then hit the quote button to quote something. It CERTAINLY isn't made clear anywhere in the interface that you can do this. You need to add a QUOTE button by each post that quotes the text AND shows the original author.

13. The reply box still shows in locked threads
You know it shouldn't do this, fellas. You're just asking for trouble.

14. Auto-locking of threads is a joke, and is a sledgehammer used to fix a tiny problem
Forums obviously stick around for a long time. And there are obviously projects that are ongoing, and sometimes don't receive attention for quite some time. So things get locked that shouldn't be. Threads that people still want to contribute to, or ask about, are gone forever. So they are forced to make new threads. It actually ADDS clutter to the forum. The correct solution is just to warn users who bump threads. I understand this is a forum for a younger audience, and younger people aren't always the brightest, but you WARN people who bump threads, you don't prevent ALL threads from getting bumped.



What I'm really saying here is TGC, you need to solidify what you have instead of jumping to the next thing so quickly. I couldn't help but notice that there's now a Facebook link by each forum post. Not only is it completely unclear what this button does (even after clicking on it, I still can't figure out what it does! Nor do I want to!), but your time could clearly be spent improving the foundation of the forums, which is usability.

From seeing how the forums are structured, it seems like you don't have a strong web team creating this website. I don't mean to be insulting here. There's just things like all these HCI problems, the fact that the forums are marked up as tables (even the posts!), and the lack of a consistent design theme that point to a need for improvement. I say this from the perspective of someone who works full time in the web industry, and seeing many examples of good, and also bad work.


Before you offer rebuttals, you need to understand something. Everything here is a real problem. It's not something you can argue for or against, it's a problem. Period. I did not come up with this list. Years of web usability came up with this list. Years of building up good software and user interfaces, books and blog posts, built this list. I am just the first person to translate all of that into a solid forum post.

I won't entertain people arguing against these problems, only people asking for clarification of what exactly makes it a problem. There's a lot more that I could say about each point and how it relates to good usability.

There are also arguments that we can get out of the way right off the bat, like:

No one is forcing you to use these forums
This is not a valid argument for obvious reasons. I hope I don't need to clarify why.

People go about using these forums every day with no problem
Of course there are problems. People fight with this interface to make it work how they want it to every day. They've just become used to it, so they don't know there's a better solution. Just because a bunch of people use something doesn't make it a good product.

TGC should focus on products, not the forums
This is both true and false. TGC should absolutely be spending more time on the products than on the forum. BUT, that's assuming the forums were built right in the first place, and don't have so many issues. From years of experience in the web world, seeing something built right the first time almost never happens. Which is why we need changes. It's also important to remember that building a community is an ongoing process, and if your vessel for that community has bugs and security flaws, then no amount of day-glo Facebook glitter will improve it.


That's it, except for when I edit my post to fix all the mistakes I find in it since there's no preview post function!

Thraxas
Retired Moderator
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Feb 2006
Location: The Avenging Axe, Turai
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 05:59
I'm not going to lock this like I did the last one as you are not being as offensive this time

However I did argue with you last time about this point:

Quote: "3. Email addresses are in plain text
As mentioned before, this is a huge security problem. You're putting the email addresses of people online. You know why this is bad. And don't think that bots are the only things that harvest email addresses. This forum NEEDS a system like a form that sends an email to the person, but never exposes the email address. This is how all other forums do it, because just putting a regular mailto link is a joke."


As you were told before the email addresses are not stored in plain text. You can check the page source for yourself to see that this is true.

As for your other points, I have no problems using the forum as they are, so they don't worry me. I disagree with your argument that people struggle with the interface here. I don't struggle with it all, it's pretty simple.

Agent Dink
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Mar 2004
Location:
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 06:28
Yeah, this is actually one of my favorite forums around. Sure some things could maybe be a bit better or more intuitive, but really... you're just nitpicking. At the end of the day, it's still just a forum. Lol.

MISoft Studios - Silver-Dawn Gorilda is lost!

Yodaman Jer
User Banned
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 06:54
I never had trouble learning how to use the forum, but I understand where you're coming from and do agree with you on a few points, namely the ones about the preview post option (or lack thereof) and the lack of auto-linking.

-Yodaman Jer.

BMacZero
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Dec 2005
Location: E:/ NA / USA
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 07:03
Quote: "There are many threads that are ruined because links aren't automatically hyperlinked."

Ummwhat?

I agree with two points - a post preview would be very nice, and also the code tags need to be improved - I don't care about colorization, but for crying out loud give me a SELECT ALL button!

I guess doing something to stop people from stretching out threads would also be very appreciated.



Yodaman Jer
User Banned
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 07:19
Quote: "...the code tags need to be improved - I don't care about colorization, but for crying out loud give me a SELECT ALL button!"


AMEN! Several times I've wanted to select all of the code, only to find that I have to drag my cursor from the top down. Which takes time, and if you go too far...gotta start all over again, and it sucks.

I'd kind of like to syntax highlighting in them, too...

-Yodaman Jer.

DJ Almix
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 25th Feb 2006
Location: Freedom
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 08:17 Edited at: 28th Sep 2009 08:24
15. There is no poll options for posts

I know what your thinking that this might be a useless feature, but people on any forum like to make posts about there opinions and now you have like 60 posts of a yes or no answer when there needs to just be a "view poll results" button, if there were polls to see what people think.

16. Descriptions of posts under titles

Most forums I see have the title and a description of the post of it. I.E

The new "Issues with this forum" thread
please help improve this forum

this just makes it a little easier to know what a post is about when people choose odd titles.



Something like that, but with each post

I agree a lot with 4, 12, and 13. Also especially 13.

RedneckRambo
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 19th Oct 2006
Location: Worst state in USA... California
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 08:46
Quote: "15. There is no poll options for posts

I know what your thinking that this might be a useless feature, but people on any forum like to make posts about there opinions and now you have like 60 posts of a yes or no answer when there needs to just be a "view poll results" button, if there were polls to see what people think."

That's pretty much the only thing I actually would really like to see added to these forums. Also a PM system but I don't care too much about that.

I do think poll options are an excellent addition.

Signature's are stupid.
Herakles
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 6th Mar 2009
Location: Lost in my own head
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 08:53
I think this forum is fine the way it is.

Swordfight! My cheesy little first game!
http://forum.thegamecreators.com/?m=forum_view&t=147808&b=36
bond1
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 27th Oct 2005
Location:
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 08:59 Edited at: 28th Sep 2009 09:04
I'm willing to bet that 99% of people here don't give the usability of the forums a second thought.

Because you say you are in this line of work, of course it bothers you. You're like the know-it-all contractor that feels the need to point out every bad drywall seam in every building he walks into. Or the "movie expert guy" that points out every technical flaw during the movie, when everyone else is just content to enjoy the show.

C'mon, you know I'm right here.

----------------------------------------
"bond1 - You see this name, you think dirty."
Virtual Nomad
Moderator
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th Dec 2005
Location: SF Bay Area, USA
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 09:55 Edited at: 28th Sep 2009 09:58
#1 personally, i like the fact that it doesn't change the signatures. i've used old signatures many times to search for particular threads. it's also a sort of time-stamp, documenting whatever a user was "into" at the time of the post.

#2 that's a matter of preference and i prefer the dropdown.

#3 been covered; no longer a valid point.

#4 it's also the way its been here for a long time, so why can't people simply add the link tags? it's not so very difficult. when i see a url (especially in a WIP thread), i figure if the OP can't bother to add the tags, then i can't bother to download the file or visit their site. so, i'm using the absence of a feature as a bonus "filter" feature.

#5 no, but there's an edit button so many people choose to ignore. and, if you're editing "a million times", maybe you need more than a preview function.

#6 could be handy.

#7 personally, i hate most other code tag "models" with their little scroll bars and all of that. i've never had a problem copying code here since i learned to triple click just before the first character in the code box...

#8 that's why i use the home & f5 keys.

#9 but then i'd have to click a thumbnail every time i wanted to see an image in full glory? no, thanks.

#10 never had that issue but not denying it exists.

#11 so-called "gigantic" images aren't common here but if it would guarantee their absence, i'd vote for it

#12 <shrugs>

#13 <is still shrugging>

#14 <is now chuckling>

noone's saying the forums here are up to date but a whole lotta people are still making use of them. frankly, i doubt the vast majority see the same disaster site you're trying to portray. and, while i'm at it, the "i don't mean to be insulting" line didn't mask the post from what it is. you spent an obvious amount of time composing your post, complete with "fancy" words and exaggerated adjectives, which you surely proof-read a dozen times. if you didn't note the insults and condecending tone, then maybe there should have been a 13.

edit: oh no! i made a spelling mistake and had to use this horrible edit feature. yeah, there are still a few, i'm sure.


dark coder
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 6th Oct 2002
Location: Japan
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 10:12 Edited at: 28th Sep 2009 10:20
Quote: "I'm willing to bet that 99% of people here don't give the usability of the forums a second thought."


Maybe some users don't like having to just suck it up all the time? How would you feel if people found flaws with your artwork but didn't point it out because '99% of people' seeing/using it wouldn't care? Some issues with this forum are beyond icons being 1 RGB value off matching and he may as well list all the issues he can think of to make it a larger topic rather than just posting major ones.

Either way, in addition to what's been posted:

17. The new topic/post text box sucks

Why is it so bad? If you click any of the buttons like 'code' it inserts the tags at the bottom of the text field and shifts the focus to the top(in FF3.5), what's up with that? This issue is amazingly annoying on large posts where it can take a bit of time to find where you were. Luckily it does work when you've selected text and press one of them, but this is hardly viable when posting large snippets, and other forums allow shortcuts like Ctrl+B to automatically make your selection bold.


17a. The new topic/post text box continues to suck

If you attempt to post something that flags the language, caps or unmodified content filter you get an error message in red and your message is retained so you can fix it, this is fine... BUT! this error doesn't go away if you don't post, if you navigate to other threads then bam the error along with your old message remains until your session changes. In addition to this, the unmodified content checker doesn't account for capitalization, I sometimes forget to make letters capital or acronyms or whatever, being unable to simply fix these on their own is annoying.


17b. The new topic/post text box continues to suck

The post parser sucks, the forum removes backslashes when you go to edit your post(a single one if you have a series of them), also it cannot hyperlink certain types of links but I don't remember the exact ones it can't.


18. The search feature is rubbish

From any page in a board you can search for things in either the 'Entire forum' or 'Just this board', upon doing a search in 'Just This Board' you're presented with the search results, at the bottom is the search box to do another search, but this only does 'Entire forum' which is stupid.


19. [Newest Post] doesn't always work

If you click [Newest Post] and your last viewed post was PostCount % PostsPerPage == 0, then if someone else posts on the thread and you click [Newest Post] you'll get sent to the last page you viewed except you've already read all the posts there. Sometimes this totally breaks (due to post approval?) and sends you to a blank page.

7 cont. Code boxes suck

As mentioned by Quoth, code boxes don't have a limited width or height which causes issues, if you expand an ungodly large code box and it has very long lines then it will alter the width of the whole forum body causing every other post to become a long line where each line is a paragraph. This isn't too bad, except that in turn this causes the current scollbar position to be incorrect and shift a mile off the code box, same for collapsing it. This is why using a fixed size one, or at least separating each of the post boxes so they can't resize each other is a good idea.



Grog Grueslayer
Valued Member
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th May 2005
Playing: Green Hell
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 11:03
I'm confused... if you say we can't argue for or against anything on the list what's the point of posting?

bond1
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 27th Oct 2005
Location:
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 11:11 Edited at: 28th Sep 2009 11:12
Quote: "How would you feel if people found flaws with your artwork but didn't point it out because '99% of people' seeing/using it wouldn't care?"


I don't know how I'd feel Homeslice, my artwork has never contained any flaws. And if 99% of the people were happy with it, I'd just ignore the nitpickers.

Ever hear the phrase, "Don't sweat the small stuff"?
Some people in this world just let the tiniest little things ruin their day, to the point of making 2 very long posts on the subject.

----------------------------------------
"bond1 - You see this name, you think dirty."
BiggAdd
Retired Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 6th Aug 2004
Location: != null
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 11:34
Quote: "8. The "Top" link at the bottom of each page REFRESHES the page. AND the "link" for each post REFRESHES the page.
You know it shouldn't do that. Come on guys. Who made that?! Please read up on how to use anchor tags properly."


Actually the link to each post works fine here.

BatVink
Moderator
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Apr 2003
Location: Gods own County, UK
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 11:35
The one thing I have an issue with is...

Quote: "I won't entertain people arguing against these problems, only people asking for clarification of what exactly makes it a problem."


That statement implies you don't understand the purpose of a forum. If you don't want debate, then don't post. That is the absolute purpose of a forum, otherwise it would just be a place to make statements with no option to reply.

Yes, the forums could be improved. But they do actually serve their purpose, there is nothing that actual stops you using them. And if a poll function was available and we asked if people would prefer better forums or better products, I don't think the forums would get a look in. Resources only stretch so far, and most forum improvements go into making sure it can be adequately moderated.

Darth Kiwi
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 7th Jan 2005
Location: On the brink of insanity.
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 13:43
Broadly, the forums work. I can live with all its very, very small flaws: the important thing is what people say on it. But, I can't help agreeing with several points:

6) I guess sorting column headers might be useful at some point. I'm not sure I'd use it very often, though. Perhaps if I've been away from the forum for months and want to see what's most popular.

7) Code tag... hm, I guess you have a point. Colourisation would be a big help. A select all button would also improve things. And when I opened dark coder's long code snippet, my scrollbar went crazy and I got completely lost, so I'm now convinced that fixing it would improve things. However, I don't think there needs to be a width restriction: if I'm writing code, I may use very long lines and it would just confuse me if those lines were shunted onto the line below. It would confuse me if this happened in code snippets as well.

12) Quote features... I agree and disagree. It would be helpful to see a quote's author. But I never liked the idea that you could quote a whole post with a single click. Sometimes you get person A giving a long post, which person B then replies to (by quoting the whole of A's post) and person A then replies to person B's post (by quoting, which will quote A's original post as a "quote with a quote") and then B will reply, so then we have three levels of quoting. I much prefer the more elegant method of picking out the sentence/paragraph in particular which you are replying to, and quoting that.

14) Autolocking. This almost happened recently, on the PoPR thread: Gil hadn't updated it in ages and it was only kept open through the timely intervention of a diligent forumite. Is there a way to prevent "good" threads from being autolocked? Perhaps if a thread has a certain number of replies or several pages, it can be designated as "popular" and will not be autolocked?

15) A poll option would be good. It's something I wouldn't use that often but I do miss it when it's not there. It would also make the election of the Forum President much easier.

11) Please, if something can be done to prevent page-stretching when someone posts a stupidly large image, let it happen! Perhaps just stretch that post but none of the others. Yes, I can toggle posts, but I can't help feeling there is a more elegant solution.

17) It is annoying that emoticons and so forth are added to the end of the post, rather than the parser location.

However, some points I disagree with:

1) I like signatures not updating all through the forum's history: you can see what games the poster was working on at the time and it gives a sense of an older thread's history.

2) Dropdown pagination is annoying for small threads, but more useful for larger ones. I think I'd most likely use pagination for larger threads, so I'm not concerned.

5) I never use preview post functions: I just post and edit. Of course, I'm not speaking for everyone, but I personally wouldn't use a preview function.

13) The reply button shows in locked threads. Well, you can't reply anyway so I don't see an issue.

17a) The idea that the content checker should check for acronyms and abbreviations, so that it can capitalise them, sounds like a bad idea to me: what if you're talking about someone who happens to have the name "Mr. Cern" and it turns it into "Mr. CERN"? What if you say "Last week in the USA, patriot Abraham Lincoln had his named changed to mirror his childhood hero" and you get it turned into "In the U.S.A P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Abraham" (etc.), because the filter thinks you're making a reference to the USA PATRIOT act? And what if somebody invents one of those acronyms that forms a real word, eg. what if someone invents the Federation of Eastern and American Revolutionaries, ie. FEAR? That could really confuse people. I think the best option is to have people go to the effort of writing their own acronyms properly.

Secretary of Unknowable Knowledge for the Rock/Dink administration '08
Thraxas
Retired Moderator
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Feb 2006
Location: The Avenging Axe, Turai
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 14:02
I don't really see autolocking as an issue as any MOD can unlock an autolocked thread.

Phaelax
DBPro Master
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 16th Apr 2003
Location: Metropia
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 15:05
Quote: "2. There no pagination, just a dropdown of pages
Pagination is a good thing. It's an accepted, standard, useful thing. A dropdown does not compare."


Technically there is, what do you think is in that drop-down? It's page numbers. You just would rather there be links for each page displayed across in a row, thus taking up more space.

Benjamin
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Nov 2002
Location: France
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 15:08
I agree that Apollo could do with some significant improvements, though you guys do have to remember that (I believe) it's only one guy working on it.

... Although that's not to say you shouldn't give your criticism of it.
Toasty Fresh
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Jun 2007
Location: In my office, making poly-eating models.
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 15:27
Quote: "From any page in a board you can search for things in either the 'Entire forum' or 'Just this board', upon doing a search in 'Just This Board' you're presented with the search results, at the bottom is the search box to do another search, but this only does 'Entire forum' which is stupid."


Hear hear! This is BLOODY annoying.
IanM
Retired Moderator
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 11th Sep 2002
Location: In my moon base
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 15:46
@QuothTheRaven,
Wow, with so many problems it's surprising that anyone even comes here any more ...

Except that they do.

No-one will stop posting because the email link uses external software, or because there isn't a print preview, or because you can't sort threads.

So, you're right, and you're wrong at the same time. Why? Because although you may have come up with the perfect user interface for the forums, there's no business case for doing ANY of the changes that you suggest.

Jeff032
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 13th Aug 2007
Location:
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 16:22
Quote: "Quote: "3. Email addresses are in plain text
As mentioned before, this is a huge security problem. You're putting the email addresses of people online. You know why this is bad. And don't think that bots are the only things that harvest email addresses. This forum NEEDS a system like a form that sends an email to the person, but never exposes the email address. This is how all other forums do it, because just putting a regular mailto link is a joke."

As you were told before the email addresses are not stored in plain text. You can check the page source for yourself to see that this is true."


So the email links are generated with javascript when the page loads. That doesn't seem to do much good to me. It took about two minutes to write a program the ripped all of the emails out of this page.



So by simply using a web browser class, I can get what Firefox calls the "Generated Source", which contains all of the mailto links in plain text since the javascript was executed.

That means that the only way to not let the links be harvested in this way would be to scrap the mailto and display the emails as something like: foo [AT] gmail [DOT] com.

Of course, if I were in the email collecting business, I might tell my crawler to capture a little bit of text whenever it sees the word "gmail", and I would be able to see what sort of patters are being used to hide email addresses. Then I would just add them to the list of patterns to search for.

So I suppose I would recommend replacing the mailto links with obfuscated addresses, but that still doesn't mean they couldn't be harvested.

dark coder
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 6th Oct 2002
Location: Japan
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 16:26
Quote: "However, I don't think there needs to be a width restriction: if I'm writing code, I may use very long lines and it would just confuse me if those lines were shunted onto the line below. It would confuse me if this happened in code snippets as well."


Who am I quoting??? No one said anything about word wrap, just a code box that acts like any other text editor. Where you see a limited view but you can scroll the contents of it both horizontally and vertically, the code is the exact same visually.

Quote: "17a) The idea that the content checker should check for acronyms and abbreviations, so that it can capitalise them, sounds like a bad idea to me:"


Huh??? I said that the forums don't detect alterations with capitalization, if you write 'MOD'(moderator) and remember that it isn't an acronym you may want to correct it to become 'mod' so you don't look stupid. But you can't as the forum seems to think the messages are identical yet they aren't. You can of course get around this by adding a redundant space or something to the message but why should we work around forum bugs?

FredP
Retired Moderator
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 27th Feb 2006
Location: Indiana
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 16:44
I like the forums just the way they are.

Failing at every guitar game ever made!
BMacZero
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Dec 2005
Location: E:/ NA / USA
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 16:50
Quote: " i learned to triple click just before the first character in the code box..."

You just made my day

Quote: "also it cannot hyperlink certain types of links but I don't remember the exact ones it can't."

It's %20's and spaces. That is a bit bothersome, I had to reorganize my whole Photobucket account to get the images to show up here



Zotoaster
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 20th Dec 2004
Location: Scotland
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 17:14
Quoth,

I agree with you. Completely. But you know as well as I do that nothing will be done about it, what-so-ever.

"everyone forgets a semi-colon sometimes." - Phaelax
thenerd
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Mar 2009
Location: Boston, USA
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 17:34
i think everything is perfect on the forums, except they should make it so you can only see email adresses if you have an account.


forever loading...
NeX the Fairly Fast Ferret
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Apr 2005
Location: The Fifth Plane of Oblivion
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 17:46
That's not really any better. The ultimate solution would be to write the email out captcha style.

Jeku
Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 17:51 Edited at: 28th Sep 2009 17:53
Quote: "I agree with you. Completely. But you know as well as I do that nothing will be done about it, what-so-ever."


Actually TGC has been fixing bugs behind the scenes, the ones that members here will probably not notice as much, but they're bugs nonetheless. It's best to get rid of bugs before adding new features.

Quote: "That's not really any better. The ultimate solution would be to write the email out captcha style."


It's been stated numerous times that the email addresses are not viewable in the code, they're obscured with JavaScript. The bots can't read them.


Senior Web Developer - Nokia
NeX the Fairly Fast Ferret
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Apr 2005
Location: The Fifth Plane of Oblivion
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 18:01 Edited at: 28th Sep 2009 18:05
I realise in the raw code they're not written out in full, but somewhere along the line they're converted into flat mailtos. If it shows up in the bar along the bottom when I mouseover, I really don't think it's gonna stop a bot. All you have to do is request the generated document object rather than the document object and it's there. Nothing short of moving the emails out of the markup encrypted or not is going to stop that. It's not exactly as if anyone actually uses the email they use to sign up to things, is it?

Seppuku Arts
Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Aug 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 18:03 Edited at: 28th Sep 2009 18:04
Quote: "It's best to get rid of bugs before adding new features."


I think that's the ultimate point here. I am actually happy with the forum the way it is - I actually prefer the Apollo system above ALL other forums I visit. I think some of the forum features suggested might make Apollo seem bloated, I mean extra features are nice, but not always a necessity and I think can be 'too much'.

At the same time, TGC probably have bigger priorities, like the bugs as Jeku mentioned, but also products TGC are making money off of, remember these guys are still bedroom coders.

DJ Almix
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 25th Feb 2006
Location: Freedom
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 18:08
Quote: "18. The search feature is rubbish

From any page in a board you can search for things in either the 'Entire forum' or 'Just this board', upon doing a search in 'Just This Board' you're presented with the search results, at the bottom is the search box to do another search, but this only does 'Entire forum' which is stupid."


I think that we should have that option as a quick search, but most regular searches have a box with all the differenent boards to search in multiple boards for a topic.



Jeff032
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 13th Aug 2007
Location:
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 18:26
Quote: "Quote: "That's not really any better. The ultimate solution would be to write the email out captcha style."

It's been stated numerous times that the email addresses are not viewable in the code, they're obscured with JavaScript. The bots can't read them. "


As I said before, which people apparently didn't notice, it is a piece of cake to write a bot/crawler that finds the emails, even if they are obfuscated with JS

C#


That's what it takes to get every email address from the mailto links in this page. It's not hard.

David R
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Sep 2003
Location: 3.14
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 18:35 Edited at: 28th Sep 2009 18:38
It's incredibly unlikely that any spambot would bother instancing an actual web view of the page in order to get addresses. So sure, you can do that with C# - but the likelihood a real spammer would use a strategy like that is practically 0. Spambots are designed to trawl millions upon millions of sites, and are probably instanced multiple times on one machine. Embedded IE doesn't really fit

EDIT: Also of note is that irrespective of how they trawl, it's still pointless. Spambots could potentially do anything to get an email address. Even if you put the addresses in images they can be nabbed. So it's JS or nothing effectively (as images are as equally pointless but more work to implement)

09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63-56-88-c0
NeX the Fairly Fast Ferret
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Apr 2005
Location: The Fifth Plane of Oblivion
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 18:39 Edited at: 28th Sep 2009 18:41
If it's that easy to do it, why wouldn't a spam spider do that? Scanning an image for text is extremely resource intensive given the amount of images on the web.

Jeff032
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 13th Aug 2007
Location:
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 18:45 Edited at: 28th Sep 2009 18:47
What if the javascript was executed on, say, mouseover of the button rather than on page load? That way, even if the bot happens to scan the generated source, it won't find the links.

(unless there who is someone who has nothing better to do than design a custom bot to grab emails from this forum, not that it would take long)

David R
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Sep 2003
Location: 3.14
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 18:48
Quote: " Scanning an image for text is extremely resource intensive given the amount of images on the web."


As is rendering each page in full to nab email addresses - spambots don't want to be waiting for the page to render, they just want the source to the page (which is less to download, and also just faster and better for multiple instances. Especially since, from a code POV, the only way the spambot can proceed with a rendered page is to wait for the 'page loaded' event from the embedded browser. That could take an insanely long time on some sites vs. just source GETting, and wastes precious scraping time)

Also, it's cheaper than you think to do the image method- just by getting the page source (i.e. without rendering the full page) you can queue up a list of images referenced by the page source. You can further filter them by size and extension before running them through OCR or whatever. It certainly isn't expensive to the point where it isn't used, because spambots already use it

09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63-56-88-c0
NeX the Fairly Fast Ferret
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Apr 2005
Location: The Fifth Plane of Oblivion
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 18:57 Edited at: 28th Sep 2009 18:57
Quote: "waiting for the page to render"


Render? Who said it had to render anything? Run the scripts, yeah, but I should hope open source browsers are modular enough that the actual visual rendering can be disabled easily.

Jeku
Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 19:19 Edited at: 28th Sep 2009 19:33
Quote: "So sure, you can do that with C# - but the likelihood a real spammer would use a strategy like that is practically 0."


Exactly, David R is correct. Potentially a rich spammer could hire a factory of Chinese workers to manually comb through forums and harvest email addresses using human eyes, so a captcha for email addresses is no more useful than JS obfuscating.

JS obfuscating is simple and will thwart the large majority, if not all, the harvesters.

EDIT:

@QuothTheRaven - There are only one or two things on that list that are arguably NEEDED. The rest are just examples of what other forums have that this forum doesn't, some of which are just "niceties". Would you email the author of Milkshape and demand features to be added because you saw them in 3DSMax? REAL security vulnerabilities are important to fix. Things like auto-linking, while nice, are not REQUIRED. You can go ahead and make threads like this offering tips and constructive advice, but the second you start demanding is when it gets annoying and unfair.


Senior Web Developer - Nokia
BatVink
Moderator
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Apr 2003
Location: Gods own County, UK
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 19:34
Quote: "though you guys do have to remember that (I believe) it's only one guy working on it."


and just to add to that, the same person is updating the applications you're here to discuss, so you really are taking away from application development time.

QuothTheRaven
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 2nd Oct 2002
Location: United States
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 19:39
Issue #3 is completely valid. Humans harvest spam emails too. And there are very easy ways to parse stuff from a rendered page. Selenium and Greasemonkey scripts can do this easily.

And don't forget the recent events when several forum members received the same spam email messages. That obviously wasn't a coincidence.

Escaped with javascript is irrevelant. No one should EVER see a forum user's email address unless that user SPECIFICALLY GIVES OUT THE EMAIL ADDRESS. Right now I could write a simple script that parses them from every thread on the forums, and sell them at 25 cents per 200 email addresses.

They should not be written out captcha style. They should not be obfuscated. They should NEVER. BE. EXPOSED.

David R
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Sep 2003
Location: 3.14
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 19:49
Quote: "They should not be written out captcha style. They should not be obfuscated. They should NEVER. BE. EXPOSED."


The whole point of them being there is so people can email you. What point is there in having an email you want to share, but not being able to see it? (because you would only fill out that field if you wanted others to be able to email you publicly.)

09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63-56-88-c0
QuothTheRaven
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 2nd Oct 2002
Location: United States
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 19:55 Edited at: 28th Sep 2009 20:02
I'm going to use the excellent example from Virtual Nomad's post.

Quote: "#1 personally, i like the fact that it doesn't change the signatures. i've used old signatures many times to search for particular threads. it's also a sort of time-stamp, documenting whatever a user was "into" at the time of the post. "

All you have said is that the search feature sucks, and that you fight with the interface to find your old threads (by using a method you had to invent due to a lack of natural, intuitive features).

Quote: "#3 been covered; no longer a valid point."

As I said before, these aren't points you can argue with. They are problems. See my post above.

Quote: "#4 it's also the way its been here for a long time, so why can't people simply add the link tags? it's not so very difficult. when i see a url (especially in a WIP thread), i figure if the OP can't bother to add the tags, then i can't bother to download the file or visit their site. so, i'm using the absence of a feature as a bonus "filter" feature. "

You just proved my point. "It's been that way for a long time...so why can't people simply do it?" Because it's not intuitive. YOU have learned to fight the system and manually apply link tags from experience. It's bad design. A newcomer would expect it to auto-link, because that's what forums do. Again, this is a bad interface.

Quote: "#5 no, but there's an edit button so many people choose to ignore."

Many people choose to ignore it ... looks like if we had a preview post feature then you wouldn't be making the complaint that people don't edit to correct their threads.

Quote: "#7 personally, i hate most other code tag "models" with their little scroll bars and all of that. i've never had a problem copying code here since i learned to triple click just before the first character in the code box..."

You've LEARNED how to do this. You had to fight with the interface to make it work for you, as opposed to an intuitive system. Do you think anyone else has learned this? Did you see BMacZero's reply right after yours? He's been fighting with the code snippets tag ever since he joined! With a well designed forum you don't have to worry about such things.

Quote: "#8 that's why i use the home & f5 keys."

Again, you have learned to avoid bad features in this forum. This is indicative of a bad design.

Quote: "#9 but then i'd have to click a thumbnail every time i wanted to see an image in full glory? no, thanks. "

Right now people hack the forum to make images they attach show up. They have to attach an image, then go and edit their post to put the PHP code in an img tag. It's another great example of bad design. Adding thumbnails instead of the "VIEW" button would negate the need for this hack.

Quote: "noone's saying the forums here are up to date but a whole lotta people are still making use of them."

As I already explained, just because a large number of people use a system doesn't make it any good.

And from this recently:
Quote: "The whole point of them being there is so people can email you. What point is there in having an email you want to share, but not being able to see it?"

Please read my description of the correct way to handle emailing in the original post.


Again, these are problems, not arguments one way or another. Just because you've fought your way to a nice happy medium with the forum interface doesn't mean a newcomer, or anyone else finds it as friendly. If you're interested in any kind of software design (or design in general), you should see these points the same way I do.

Jeku
Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 20:58
@Quoth - Did you even read my post?

Quote: "Again, you have learned to avoid bad features in this forum. This is indicative of a bad design."


Pressing F5 and having the forum page refresh is now suddenly TGC's fault?


Senior Web Developer - Nokia
Seppuku Arts
Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Aug 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 21:02 Edited at: 28th Sep 2009 21:02
Quote: "There are only one or two things on that list that are arguably NEEDED. The rest are just examples of what other forums have that this forum doesn't, some of which are just "niceties". Would you email the author of Milkshape and demand features to be added because you saw them in 3DSMax? REAL security vulnerabilities are important to fix. Things like auto-linking, while nice, are not REQUIRED. You can go ahead and make threads like this offering tips and constructive advice, but the second you start demanding is when it gets annoying and unfair."


Yes, considering some of us prefer the simple, yet functional layout of Milkshape, I mean Apollo.

Virtual Nomad
Moderator
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th Dec 2005
Location: SF Bay Area, USA
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 22:53 Edited at: 28th Sep 2009 23:19
related to #4, "no autolinks" - this reminds me that i'm currently trying to find a way to select some text (ie, a non-linked URL) in my browser (IE8), (and in other apps like Notepad, etc, would be nice, too) then be able to right-click and have an "open in web browser" or "...new tab" type of function(s) available.

i've browsed some of the IE8 "Accelerators" and found nothing (tho there are many more to search through, it just gets old sifting through all the advert stuff, etc). i'd settle for a "Send to IE" type of option but there's probably a better way (i could write a simple app or insert a command line function if i knew where to put it). i've added to my "Send To" queue before (adding shortcuts to folders that i use often) in the past (under 98 and/or XP... i'm now on a vista system) so i'm hoping there's a similar method. alas, i just don't know where to look or the terminology to use for my searches. any direction is appreciated

i should mention: i know i can copy and paste in the address bar, etc, but my scope for this functionality is broader than URLs. i want to select some text (in browser, notepad, etc) and be able to right-click and have additional options in the right-click menu to do with the text what i want. ie, i own adobe acrobat and there are various functions added to rick-click menus that do certain things (like convert to PDF, etc). this is where i want to be. thanks again


Uncle Sam
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 23rd Jul 2005
Location: West Coast, USA
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 23:24
Quote: "At the end of the day, it's still just a forum. Lol."


Ah, Dink. If only everyone on the forums knew that.

RedneckRambo
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 19th Oct 2006
Location: Worst state in USA... California
Posted: 28th Sep 2009 23:35
Quote: "As I already explained, just because a large number of people use a system doesn't make it any good."

No but it means the system is good enough to use.

Signature's are stupid.
Thraxas
Retired Moderator
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Feb 2006
Location: The Avenging Axe, Turai
Posted: 29th Sep 2009 00:24
I have a solution. QuothTheRaven, you can code a new forum which can do everything you want.

It's probably a better use of your time than coming in here and kicking up a fuss everytime you want some attention!

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2025-06-04 20:51:35
Your offset time is: 2025-06-04 20:51:35