i saw this a couple days ago and i cringed. not because of the quality or anything as i'm sure this is based on one of the many locomotive "blue prints" readily available via a quick search, but because of the subject matter itself; i'm a railroader, you see. 17 years of trains, trains, (and more trains), and i was wondering when something like this would show up here (i know of a few train enthusiasts
* on the boards here).
anyway, a couple days ago a co-worker brought a pocket-sized guide with many old engine photos to work, some of which looked very similar to this. railroads are always experimenting, trying to get the most bang for the buck. designs like this (basically, 2 locomotives combined) would be a good example. the one i remember from the book had the cab in the center. as an engineer, it's a ridiculous design since your view is obscured in BOTH front and back. as we no longer have firemen (who used to sit on the other side of the cab and could help watch for trouble), this would be ridiculous to most, but there's something to be said for having ~200 tons of steel between you and anything you might come in contact with at speed, from a safety perspective.
anyway, i'm sure you didn't come here for a railroad lesson so i'll stop. point is, yes, if it isn't based on an actual blueprint of a locomotive, i've seen some very similar.
@sigh - do you have a working rail system? i've entertained the idea of programming various railroad games/applications and i wonder if you've done so already? btw, is that a southern pacific design? i've heard they were one of the more creative ones (well that's what the co-worker said, but do the railroads go to GE/EMD with designs first or did the builders do it?)
*we railroaders have a few other "terms" we use for them which are not very nice
ah: knew i'd started one at some point:
horrible, i know
Virtual Nomad @ California, USA
AMD Phenom™ X4 9750 Quad-Core @ 2.4 GHz . 8 GB PC2-6400 RAM
ATI Radeon HD 3650 @ 512 MB . Vista Home Premium 64 Bit