Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

3 Dimensional Chat / .50 Caliber Sniper Rifle

Author
Message
Travis Gatlin
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th May 2009
Location: Oxford, Alabama
Posted: 6th Sep 2010 00:59
Link
A Few Hours ago i made a Sniper Rifle and it is 4,924 Polygons
and i am giving it away for free, it's not textured. I made it blender in about 30 minutes, if you want a specific format, then just tell me and i will export it for you and put it up for download. Please give feedback and be honest.
There is a screenshot attached.

The Object of war is not to die for your country but make the other guy die for his

Attachments

Login to view attachments
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 6th Sep 2010 01:29
Link
may i ask..
how THAT can be 5k polies?
can i please see wireframe?


[Q]uik, Quiker than most
Back to top
Profile PM
Travis Gatlin
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th May 2009
Location: Oxford, Alabama
Posted: 6th Sep 2010 02:00
Link
ok. i just got that reading from 3D Model Viewer. but yeah, here is a wire frame.

The Object of war is not to die for your country but make the other guy die for his

Attachments

Login to view attachments
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Master Man Of Justice
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 13th Feb 2008
Location: Between Insanity and Intelligence
Posted: 6th Sep 2010 02:44
Link
Ok if your calling that done, i would delete some parts and redo it.

The scope, the handle, and the barrel have WAY TO MANY polies.

But you left the body of the gun with like 20 polys?

i know im being harsh, but you put smoothness where it wasnt really needed as much, and left places bone dry.

The grip looks like i couldnt grab onto it.

Sorry to be short, but they are very necessary changes.

Back to top
Profile PM Email
Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 6th Sep 2010 02:56
Link
exactly what he said ^

the barrel could be done using a 12 or approx a 14 sided cylinder! same with the scope


[Q]uik, Quiker than most
Back to top
Profile PM
Lee Stevens
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 19th Apr 2007
Location: Deep in code...
Posted: 6th Sep 2010 05:14
Link
@Travis, I think the model looks good, theres too many polys in it tho, The scope and barrel you should change to a 10 sided cylinder, it will look basically the same and it will still look good rendered
hey constructive critism never hurt anyone

If There Is A Problem, Find The Question.
Lee Stevens 1st September 2007
Back to top
Profile PM
Travis Gatlin
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th May 2009
Location: Oxford, Alabama
Posted: 6th Sep 2010 16:55
Link
yeah, i would decrease the polies but whenever i add the decimate modifier then it says "non Manifold Mesh as input" i hate that, i just have no idea why it does it, i could probally delete the barrel and the scope and try again.

The Object of war is not to die for your country but make the other guy die for his
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 6th Sep 2010 17:26
Link
Quote: "i could probally delete the barrel and the scope and try again.
"


that would probably be your best bet yes


[Q]uik, Quiker than most
Back to top
Profile PM
Travis Gatlin
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th May 2009
Location: Oxford, Alabama
Posted: 6th Sep 2010 17:35
Link
i just finished re doing them, i replaced the 23 poly cylinders with 10 poly ones and that help alot, by over 2000 polies now it is
2230 polygons, i also smoothed out the handle alot and made it better without increasing the polygon count. here is the new model.

The Object of war is not to die for your country but make the other guy die for his

Attachments

Login to view attachments
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Fa1len4ngel
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 7th Aug 2009
Location:
Posted: 6th Sep 2010 18:20
Link
The stock is bugging me a bit.It probably contains all the polys unless you have unnecessary polys. I would like you to post a better wire frame because the blender wireframe viewing mode doesn't really show all the polys.
Back to top
Profile PM
Travis Gatlin
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th May 2009
Location: Oxford, Alabama
Posted: 6th Sep 2010 21:01 Edited at: 6th Sep 2010 21:30
Link
yeah, it doesnt look right but is the best i could get at the time, i will fix
EDIT
Here is The Better Wireframe you requested
Sorry its a BMP

The Object of war is not to die for your country but make the other guy die for his

Attachments

Login to view attachments
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Master Man Of Justice
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 13th Feb 2008
Location: Between Insanity and Intelligence
Posted: 6th Sep 2010 23:48 Edited at: 6th Sep 2010 23:48
Link
Ok the subdivision on the stock looks wrong and out of place.

I made my own to show you what you can do, and it only comes out at 130 polys.

And the handle isnt really smoothed.still looks like a wooden block.

here is the stock i made in 5 minutes.


Attachments

Login to view attachments
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Master Man Of Justice
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 13th Feb 2008
Location: Between Insanity and Intelligence
Posted: 7th Sep 2010 00:13 Edited at: 7th Sep 2010 00:15
Link
And here is an example of a more grip-able grip. xD
its only 122 polygons.


Attachments

Login to view attachments
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Travis Gatlin
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th May 2009
Location: Oxford, Alabama
Posted: 8th Sep 2010 00:10
Link
i can see your point! I'll give it a new stock and grip.

The Object of war is not to die for your country but make the other guy die for his
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Master Man Of Justice
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 13th Feb 2008
Location: Between Insanity and Intelligence
Posted: 8th Sep 2010 00:15
Link
Good luck
i hope to see this finished

Back to top
Profile PM Email
Travis Gatlin
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th May 2009
Location: Oxford, Alabama
Posted: 8th Sep 2010 01:35
Link
Having a little trouble with the stock, i cant get it to look right on the gun. tell me if this look right.

The Object of war is not to die for your country but make the other guy die for his

Attachments

Login to view attachments
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Master Man Of Justice
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 13th Feb 2008
Location: Between Insanity and Intelligence
Posted: 8th Sep 2010 01:52 Edited at: 8th Sep 2010 01:55
Link
heh sorry for writing free handed in paint
you just made it to fat at the back and you need to lower it or the guy will be looking over the scope.

and try to chamfer the bottom rail of the stock (where it connects to the gun)


Attachments

Login to view attachments
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Travis Gatlin
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th May 2009
Location: Oxford, Alabama
Posted: 8th Sep 2010 04:19
Link
Ah, thats easy to do, here are my results.

The Object of war is not to die for your country but make the other guy die for his

Attachments

Login to view attachments
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Fa1len4ngel
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 7th Aug 2009
Location:
Posted: 8th Sep 2010 05:07
Link
I hope your using a reference picture if not please do. That will fix your stock problem so you know the scale, location and look.
Back to top
Profile PM
Pbcrazy
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 25th Sep 2008
Location: ...pillow room...
Posted: 8th Sep 2010 15:09
Link
Yes, please find a reference image. It looks like you are trying to model something with just a general idea and no real understanding on the technicalities of firearms.
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Master Man Of Justice
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 13th Feb 2008
Location: Between Insanity and Intelligence
Posted: 8th Sep 2010 20:45
Link
Good lord.

Not everything has to be so technical.

For all we know maybe he could be making his own weapon with the general concept of a .50 cal.

Stop flaming.

Back to top
Profile PM Email
Pbcrazy
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 25th Sep 2008
Location: ...pillow room...
Posted: 9th Sep 2010 01:10
Link
Technicality is what makes the model believable, especially weapons.

And I'm not flaming, I'm just tell him what I think needs to be done to make it a better model.
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Travis Gatlin
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th May 2009
Location: Oxford, Alabama
Posted: 11th Sep 2010 01:52 Edited at: 11th Sep 2010 02:09
Link
Quote: "I hope your using a reference picture if not please do. That will fix your stock problem so you know the scale, location and look. "

I am, im just modeling off of it and what you tell me
EDIT
This is almost Precisely what the reference tells me to do (with lower Polys)

The Object of war is not to die for your country but make the other guy die for his

Attachments

Login to view attachments
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Master Man Of Justice
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 13th Feb 2008
Location: Between Insanity and Intelligence
Posted: 11th Sep 2010 03:26
Link
you should be modeling off of multiple reference pictures especially with popular weapons such as your .50

Back to top
Profile PM Email
Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 11th Sep 2010 11:37
Link
Quote: "you should be modeling off of multiple reference pictures especially with popular weapons such as your .50
"


however that can be hard when starting out.

better finding a rather decent reference and go from there.


[Q]uik, Quiker than most
Back to top
Profile PM
Master Man Of Justice
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 13th Feb 2008
Location: Between Insanity and Intelligence
Posted: 11th Sep 2010 14:37
Link
Well i didnt mean he has to set his perspective view to 45 degrees then go find a 45 degree angle ref pic, i meant he should look at a whole lot of pictures to give his mind a better picture of what it should look like.

Because it looks like his proportions are of just a little bit, and it is because he is limiting himself to just 1 picture.

Back to top
Profile PM Email
Travis Gatlin
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th May 2009
Location: Oxford, Alabama
Posted: 11th Sep 2010 20:07
Link
Let Me give you a better look at the stock, the side view isnt really all that good for that.

The Object of war is not to die for your country but make the other guy die for his

Attachments

Login to view attachments
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Master Man Of Justice
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 13th Feb 2008
Location: Between Insanity and Intelligence
Posted: 12th Sep 2010 03:13
Link
XD thats still a side view.

Back to top
Profile PM Email
Travis Gatlin
15
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th May 2009
Location: Oxford, Alabama
Posted: 12th Sep 2010 17:15
Link
well its a better one!

The Object of war is not to die for your country but make the other guy die for his
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Back to top

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2024-11-24 10:39:41
Your offset time is: 2024-11-24 10:39:41