LM is a hash, but because of weaknesses in it's implementation, it is very easy to get the password from the hash - consider it insecure and broken.
NT is also a hash, but it's based on the outdated and provably broken MD4 hashing method - it was broken at one point as has since been improved. How secure it really is right now is anyones guess.
Quote: "MD5 and MD4 witch are checksums, not encryption hashes"
MD5 and MD4 are definitely hashes, despite their weaknesses. In fact, every function in that plug-in, except for the CRC functions, are hashes.
Hashes are one way, encryption is reversible.
I don't know what 'encryption hash' means, but did you mean Cryptographic hash? In that case, all of the functions qualify as that (admittedly at widely different levels of security).