Quote: "Nice idea. Perhaps something even more suggestive, without lying...
"The game that Desura wouldn't publish""
I didn't see it as lying. As a group of people (unless the company is one person, which I didn't assume) they would be distributors, plural.
Sure the company is one entity, but I was referring to their group of employees as being distributors. (to me they are, and I am including the testers)
And, they do release to the general public, so I take their answer in short as... 'this is too difficult for the general public'
So my phrase was an expression of my perception of their statement, not a direct quote from it.
Apologies for any confusion, but I had no intention to lie, just getting to the point to be brief without singling out any company in the statement. (no need for bad publicity)
Yeah, I am poking fun a little here, but not naming them in an ad campaign.
To me that would be like a bad political advertisement bashing the other opponent... I am not paying to advertise their name, or brand.
Quote: "As CE says, it's like saying "Do not open this box". I'd always open the box.
"
Yeah, its like "here is your x-mas present early, but don't open it until x-mas"
Dude, if you gave it to me early then why should I not open it early?
You should have waited to give it to me, instead of expecting me to sit there staring at it wondering whats in it.
Of course, it's open right then.
Quote: "The team found that the gameplay was very difficult and often confusing"
This game is supposed to be difficult.
Confusing? For some maybe, but that's no reason to punish the ones who can understand it.
That's like saying any game that doesn't appeal to everyone should not be published.
Again, Really?
Spoke my peace, thanks, and best of luck with them to you Moondog.
Coding things my way since 1981 -- Currently using AppGameKit V2 Tier 1
