Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

Geek Culture / ATI Radeon Mobile 9000, what can you guys tell me about this card?

Author
Message
Proteus
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Oct 2002
Location: The Future
Posted: 24th Jun 2004 23:35
Virtually anything is better than my current sis "video card", but I wanted to know about your experience with this Radeon 9000 Mb...

Thanks

Karlos
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Nov 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posted: 24th Jun 2004 23:50
its better than the sis - i've got one - works fine although i don't do too much graphical work - need to get omega drivers rather than manufacturers and is pretty decent for a laptop chip although there are better chips out there.

All Hail the Glory of the HypnoToad
XP Pro - Radeon 9000 Mobility- P4 3.0ish
Football management - Football Manager
Emperor Baal
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 1st Dec 2003
Location: The Netherlands - Oudenbosch
Elleomea
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 2nd Aug 2003
Location: England
Posted: 25th Jun 2004 00:21 Edited at: 25th Jun 2004 00:21
I've got one, works pretty well under Linux for 3D acceleration, plays the UT2004 demo fairly reasonably; ~1900fps with glxgears at 24bit (probably not much use to non-linux types). As far as Windows and DirectX are concerned I seem to remember it's DirectX 8.1 compliant with support for some shaders.

How much ham could a hamster stir, if a hamster could stir ham?
Emperor Baal
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 1st Dec 2003
Location: The Netherlands - Oudenbosch
Posted: 25th Jun 2004 00:35 Edited at: 25th Jun 2004 00:35
Quote: "I've got one, works pretty well under Linux for 3D acceleration, plays the UT2004 demo fairly reasonably; ~1900fps with glxgears at 24bit (probably not much use to non-linux types). As far as Windows and DirectX are concerned I seem to remember it's DirectX 8.1 compliant with support for some shaders.
"




hehe

Elleomea
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 2nd Aug 2003
Location: England
Posted: 25th Jun 2004 01:31 Edited at: 25th Jun 2004 01:33
That's correct, I do get around 1900 frames per second with glxgears. It's a very simple benchmarking tool that displays three interlocked gears rotating. With just software rendering I can get around 300-400 frames per second.

How much ham could a hamster stir, if a hamster could stir ham?
spooky
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Aug 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posted: 25th Jun 2004 17:12
I've got one in my laptop (FS-Amilo). It's pretty good but there are much better ones out now. I can run any game and dbpro works like a dream with it.

Beware that laptop manufacturers have a bad habit of never updating the graphics drivers and you can't simply download latest ones off ATI website as they won't install on laptops. To get around this, do like Karlos and either get Omega drivers or like me, download latest ATI drivers and 'Patje' patch them so they will install.


Boo!
Karlos
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Nov 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posted: 25th Jun 2004 17:21
alledgedly the latest Omega drivers see a performance boost to all mobile chips.

Sounds promising - will give it a shot with StarWars Galaxies tonight see if my fps goes up a little.

All Hail the Glory of the HypnoToad
XP Pro - Radeon 9000 Mobility- P4 3.0ish
Football management - Football Manager
Proteus
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Oct 2002
Location: The Future
Posted: 25th Jun 2004 23:34
Thanks for the replies, this laptop was kind of an “inevitable buy� it’s not mine, but I’ll be able to program in it from time to time

And thanks for the tip on the drivers

Shadow Robert
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 22nd Sep 2002
Location: Hertfordshire, England
Posted: 26th Jun 2004 02:27
Inevitable buys are anything Alienware or Falcon Rigs... everything else is second class

Dazzag
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 26th Aug 2002
Location: Cyprus
Posted: 26th Jun 2004 03:21
Performance wise, the Alienware Area-51 is not quite upto it. Always tend to be a good 10%+ worse than the best of the AJPs (D500E currently) or Rockdirects (Extreme). Personally also quite like the Voodoo (US though), and SavRow is looking quite nice (check out the custom made Swordfish desktop on their forum).

But you got to love those Alien Eyes! Very cool.

Then again, considering you ended that statement with a winking smilie then I take it you were taking the piss?

Cheers

I am 99% probably lying in bed right now... so don't blame me for crappy typing

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2024-11-25 12:55:04
Your offset time is: 2024-11-25 12:55:04