Quote: "Yes, because violent media IS NOT A DISEASE THAT KILLS PEOPLE.
The logic is not the same."
The logic is
identical. The content is irrelative to the structure of the argument, which is the same. It doesn't matter if it's rape, violent media or a disease, the argument about a lack of right to complain about it based on a
generalized, bigoted assumption.
Quote: "
Nope.
Quote: "Making (incorrect [doesn't help]) assumptions about the people you're debating with rarely aids your case"
Boohoo, I made an assumption based on your statements. Sue me."
You have no argument in response, only a flat 'no' which does very little to reinforce your case. I've already proven you wrong and if you have nothing to respond to that but saying 'you're wrong', just give the damn thing up.
Quote: "YOU'LL HAVE TO SHOW ME A STATISTIC. "
My argument isn't based on one you moron
Quote: "My views are illogical. WHAT IS ILLOGICAL ABOUT THEM?
Mouse, this is an ARGUEMENT ABOUT OPINION."
No, it's not. Nemo said it was
insulting that
Americans, not the
American media, excercised the
right to complain about
bad taste, with no argument backing him. You supported him. I have proved that you have no logic in support and that's the end of it. It's been proven very completely if you'll read my damn posts.
Quote: "The only thing that was truly wrong was you attacking Nemo and calling him a bigot."
I never attacked him, I said his argument was fallacious and bigoted. I have said nothing about him or his personality so forth and I don't plan to as it is irrelivant to what he posted. If you take offense at the fact that I'm not all sunshine and rainbows about him posting his
bigoted (it's there whether you like it or not) opinion, get over it.
Quote: "Speaking of spitting out terms, factually bankrupt? *pukes*"
Look up the words...
Quote: "Illogical? Again, no, and I've already explained WHY."
No you haven't. I'll spell it out once again: Nemo posted an illogical generalization stating that it insulting him that Americans had the gall to excerice their right to complain about bad taste. Implicit to being insulted by something is that it is wrong. You backed this argument up. At no point has either of you ever given any logical structure for it.
Quote: "Another pathetic attempt to attack my statement due to its validity."
Here's an idea: Why don't you spell out your logic as I already have for you four times, since you have not once made it clear in all your mindless ranting?
Quote: "Debate? HA! you don't know debates."
Since I'm the one with a solid argument and you haven't even expressed yours, that's a rather amusing statement.
Quote: "I happen to be a member of JSA. There, we debate."
Ooh. JSA.
Quote: "Going through someone's online post and picking apart every little comment they make is not a debate. It's a bickering contest."
If you're not responding to every argument your opponent makes relating to the topics, it's not a damn debate-- once again you prove you don't know what you're talking about. Also intrinsic to debates is actually having an argument, which you don't.
Quote: "Yes, I'm bickering. I'm attacking you because I don't like you. And you're doing the same to me. It's the same thing when you're all over Raven whenver he talks."
If I liked you, my posts would certainly be rather less barbed. On the other hand, it'd be hard for me to do that even if you didn't have a previous history of... ahem... '
original debating'... anyone who wants a quick history lesson on this can do a search for HZense's amusing religion arguments.
Raven? Typically, I ignore him. Now and then it's irresistable to point out a particularly idiotic mistake-- most people who know him would, I think, agree, though most are more mature than I and just ignore him all the time
.
Quote: "Oh, and don't drag other people into this."
I was providing a subject for my argument that you had no clue how to formally or informally debate; it would have been baseless and illogical otherwise, but then, that's your cup of tea isn't it?
