Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

Geek Culture / Self-moderating? [forum idea]

Author
Message
Three Score
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Jun 2004
Location: behind you
Posted: 9th Mar 2005 09:26
Link
a thing i really reallly think should happen is self moderating so that you could delete your own threads, lock your own threads, and edit any of your own posts in ANY way and ANY post and also being able to change the title and move it to different boards

Q&A
q: what if a mod locks your thread
a: well of course it will be completely untouchable by you
q: what if you lock your own thread
a: same as above


well all i can think of post any disadvantage of this though(besides that you would have to chaneg the forum a bit)

quit hiting the computer; computers can only do what they are told so we must be telling them to do wrong things
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Osiris
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 6th Aug 2004
Location: Robbinsdale, MN
Posted: 9th Mar 2005 09:31
Link
What if someone posts pron, and then locks it, what then eh...

Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Sol462
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 12th Sep 2004
Location: playing with the spazookeedoo
Posted: 9th Mar 2005 09:46
Link
The mods would still have control of it, in this case deleting it. Sounds like a good idea, and it would sure stop those posts saying, "mods please lock this."
But on the other hand I doubt that the idea will make it into reality.

Back to top
Profile PM Website
Jimmy
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 20th Aug 2003
Location: Back in the USA
Posted: 9th Mar 2005 10:35
Link
It would be too tempting for me to start a controversial thread then lock it once I get the last word in.


Well we all shine on, like the moon, and the stars, and the sun.
Back to top
Profile PM Website
Sol462
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 12th Sep 2004
Location: playing with the spazookeedoo
Posted: 9th Mar 2005 10:44
Link
Lol. Then Mouse comes along and unlocks it. Or deletes it or whatever.

Back to top
Profile PM Website
Three Score
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Jun 2004
Location: behind you
Posted: 9th Mar 2005 11:42
Link
yea good point but still i mean u made it so you hsould be able to control it

quit hiting the computer; computers can only do what they are told so we must be telling them to do wrong things
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Lost in Thought
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Feb 2004
Location: U.S.A. : Douglas, Georgia
Posted: 9th Mar 2005 11:47 Edited at: 9th Mar 2005 11:52
Link
The only extra powers I think we should have are. Lock your own thread, rename your own thread, and most importantly .... You should be able to edit the source boxes in your post. Alot of key get accidently posted there and it takes forever to get a mod. Meanwhile everyone gets the code when you could have just changed it. I do not think we should be able to delete our own threads though. Someone else might learn from them even if they are useless to us.

[edit]
Quote: "Someone else might learn from them even if they are useless to us."


Even though apparently almost nobody knows how to use the search feature of this forum. Even though it does suck. It only looks for exact strings in the thread title. It should at least break down the strings and search for all. If you search "game collision" it will not find anything when it should pick up game and collision. Bad example I know but you get the idea.

Back to top
Profile PM Email
Lynx
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 28th Jan 2004
Location: IRC chat
Posted: 9th Mar 2005 11:48
Link
I don't think being able to delete it would be very good, or being able to edit someone elses posts.

Just remember.. some people are twits.

Back to top
Profile PM Email
Eric T
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 7th Apr 2003
Location: My location is where I am at this time.
Posted: 9th Mar 2005 11:55
Link
I have a better idea, to hell with self moderation! Instead we hire 7 mods who have no sense of rational thought. Then we let them run through Banning, locking, deleting and editing till they get tired and go to sleep. Then when they wake up, it'll start again.

Now that'd be awesome.

"We were somewhere around Barstow on the edge of the desert when the drugs began to take hold..."
- From Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas by Hunter S Thompson (1937-2005)
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Sol462
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 12th Sep 2004
Location: playing with the spazookeedoo
Posted: 9th Mar 2005 11:59
Link
[joke]Isn't that how it is now?[/joke]
I mean some mods take part in a controversal thread, then another locks it.
And why is Lost in Thought quoting himself?

Back to top
Profile PM Website
Three Score
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Jun 2004
Location: behind you
Posted: 9th Mar 2005 12:02
Link
yea i guess on those 2 but i never said u should be able to edit osmeone elses source also

but yea why hasnt this been done on a lot of forums though such as phpbb along with apollo
i mean can soemone tell me one bad point about it
and im pretty sure it wouldnt be that hard to edit it to where u were the owner of your thread

quit hiting the computer; computers can only do what they are told so we must be telling them to do wrong things
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Required
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 25th Feb 2005
Location: Server Down
Posted: 9th Mar 2005 12:02
Link
The suggestion is for self moderation.
I quite like the idea. It really doesn't give moderators any more work to do, because in all forums where users have this control, Moderators have the control to over-ride it.

If suggestions are being made for the forum.
• Personal Messaging System. I rarely use them, just is something that feels wrong not to have it.
• Post Culling. This one I like, because it means you only end up with the last 7days of posting. Unless the thread is active, or marked against it.

System: Windows XP CPU: AMD Athlon 2600+ RAM: 512MB Video: GeForce FX 5200 Audio: C-Media 9739 DirectX: Version 9.0c
Back to top
Profile PM Website
Three Score
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Jun 2004
Location: behind you
Posted: 9th Mar 2005 12:09
Link
i disagree with post culling because an old thread may have a lot in it or osurce code and then it just disappears into a 0byte sector

although the searh system needs to be fixed because the google search system sucks especially since the title(in google anyway) for every friggin thread is the same

quit hiting the computer; computers can only do what they are told so we must be telling them to do wrong things
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Lost in Thought
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Feb 2004
Location: U.S.A. : Douglas, Georgia
Posted: 9th Mar 2005 12:54
Link
Quote: "And why is Lost in Thought quoting himself?"


Because crazy people do that

Back to top
Profile PM Email
bitJericho
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Oct 2002
Location: United States
Posted: 9th Mar 2005 14:36 Edited at: 9th Mar 2005 14:36
Link
Quote: "I mean some mods take part in a controversal thread, then another locks it."


What's wrong with that? Mods are people too So one wants to post, and one doesn't like the flaming.. It's not like they should talk amongst themselves, it's a shoot first and ask questions later system, if they really wanted to unlock the thread, then they can.


Yarr join teh New and Improved LoGD!
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Dave J
Retired Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 11th Feb 2003
Location: Secret Military Pub, Down Under
Posted: 9th Mar 2005 15:28
Link
Quote: "i mean can soemone tell me one bad point about it"


It would create complete and utter chaos, case closed.


"Computers are useless, they can only give you answers."
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Damokles
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 28th May 2003
Location: Belgium
Posted: 9th Mar 2005 16:03
Link
Well it sounds nice to be able to :
- Lock our own threads
- Request a mod to delete our thread (as icon in fron of the title)

By the way, did you try [href=TGC-Future mailing list]http://forum.thegamecreators.com/?m=forum_view&t=49095&b=2[/href] ?

- Mind the gap -
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Required
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 25th Feb 2005
Location: Server Down
Posted: 9th Mar 2005 19:07
Link
Quote: "It would create complete and utter chaos, case closed."


I would like to see a more structured explaination as to how it would create complete and utter chaos.

People would only be able to Delete, or Lock thier own threads from other users. They would only be able to Unlock said thread if they had Locked it.

Moderators and Administrators would still hold the power to veto any actions that were deemed wrong. Unless I am missing some important peice of information that shows how such powers could be abused.

System: Windows XP CPU: AMD Athlon 2600+ RAM: 512MB Video: GeForce FX 5200 Audio: C-Media 9739 DirectX: Version 9.0c
Back to top
Profile PM Website
Van B
Moderator
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Oct 2002
Location: Sunnyvale
Posted: 9th Mar 2005 19:35
Link
Features like that would probably just give spammers more toys to play with here - there's too many users that could'nt be trusted to play fair.

I agree that a 'Report to Moderator' button would be nice - we don't check every single thread here, so finding ones that need action is really a case of the originator emailing a mod, a button that highlighted it for us would be cool. Not that we're editors here, we'd only lock a topic on request if it really needed locking - but it would be a very useful tool for stepping on spammers or folk posting porn etc.


Van-B


It's c**p being the only coder in the village.
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Dave J
Retired Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 11th Feb 2003
Location: Secret Military Pub, Down Under
Posted: 9th Mar 2005 19:52
Link
Quote: "I would like to see a more structured explaination as to how it would create complete and utter chaos."


The average user has no restraint, they'll lock and delete their own threads whenever they please. I can definitely see the possibility of many locked threads whenever someone disagrees with the original author (be it a valid point or not), additionally, giving mods the power to re-unlock those threads is hardly a viable solution. The only thing you'd be doing by giving more power to the user is creating more work for us mods.

Van B put it very nicely in the first sentence of his post:

Quote: "Features like that would probably just give spammers more toys to play with here - there's too many users that couldn't be trusted to play fair."



"Computers are useless, they can only give you answers."
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Required
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 25th Feb 2005
Location: Server Down
Posted: 9th Mar 2005 20:24
Link
Quote: "The only thing you'd be doing by giving more power to the user is creating more work for us mods."


I get the feeling that this is more the excuse behind the reasoning.
If someone decided to abuse thier Self-Lock and Self-Delete buttons, then would they not just be screwing themselves over?

System: Windows XP CPU: AMD Athlon 2600+ RAM: 512MB Video: GeForce FX 5200 Audio: C-Media 9739 DirectX: Version 9.0c
Back to top
Profile PM Website
BatVink
Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Apr 2003
Location: Gods own County, UK
Posted: 9th Mar 2005 20:31
Link
Editing thread title - yes. For WIP and Program Announcements it would be easy to highlight updates. Ever tried checking the Blue IDE thread to see if there are updates?

The rest, I'm not so sure.

BatVink
Back to top
Profile PM Email
the_winch
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 1st Feb 2003
Location: Oxford, UK
Posted: 9th Mar 2005 21:05
Link
Quote: "I would like to see a more structured explaination as to how it would create complete and utter chaos."


It wouldn't obviously.

I still don't see why you need to lock and delete your threads. What good would it bring to the forum?

If you create a thread it is not yours it belongs to the forum and is at the mercy or what the forum population decides to do with it.
Do you really think it's a good idea to allow people to stop discussion or worse delete it completly just because they don't like the responses?

Quote: "this is not a quote"
Back to top
Profile PM Website
Van B
Moderator
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Oct 2002
Location: Sunnyvale
Posted: 9th Mar 2005 21:12
Link
Quote: "If someone decided to abuse thier Self-Lock and Self-Delete buttons, then would they not just be screwing themselves over?"


No they'd be screwing over anyone who posted in their thread. When you make a topic, your asking for peoples views - and it's common human curtesy to listen to an opinion you just asked for. Imagine we get a flame posted by the thread originator, then they lock it to have the last word - how often do you think we'll get posts about posts that have been locked?

Remember they have these features on LLRGT, but the only one that is used that often is the ability to change the topic title, I rarely see people locking their own threads or deleting their posts.


Van-B


It's c**p being the only coder in the village.
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Required
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 25th Feb 2005
Location: Server Down
Posted: 9th Mar 2005 23:01
Link
Quote: "Remember they have these features on LLRGT, but the only one that is used that often is the ability to change the topic title, I rarely see people locking their own threads or deleting their posts."


Does that not really prove my point?
It is better to have something, yet never need to use it. Than not have it in the first place.

There are a number of times I have seen people post up to 5 posts with out realising it, when they could edit thier first post and delete the rest. As it stands they must ask a moderator to do it.

I can see Thread Locking, being quite useful for Information or Tutorial Threads. Not every thread on the forum is about getting feedback.

It would be annoying having to contact a moderator each time I wanted to update a tutorial thread, or a thread dedicated to say, 3D Programs. The last thing you want in a thread like that is a huge number of people posting up "What is such-and-such like?", followed by the thread becomming a large debate on what application is the best. Given the original thread was just to let people know what was available.

System: Windows XP CPU: AMD Athlon 2600+ RAM: 512MB Video: GeForce FX 5200 Audio: C-Media 9739 DirectX: Version 9.0c
Back to top
Profile PM Website
Kentaree
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Oct 2002
Location: Clonmel, Ireland
Posted: 9th Mar 2005 23:17
Link
Personally, I like the idea, I don't see how it will be abused much.

Quote: "No they'd be screwing over anyone who posted in their thread. When you make a topic, your asking for peoples views - and it's common human curtesy to listen to an opinion you just asked for."


Then imagine this, people have posted in a genuine thread, and some wally comes along and starts spamming, isnt it smarter for the creator to lock the thread and make sure at least more than 50% of it is valid material?

Desktop: AMD Athlon XP2800+,Radeon 9800 128MB, 1GB DDR RAM
Laptop: AMD Athlon 64M 3000+,Mobility Radeon 9700 128MB, 512MB DDR RAM
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Van B
Moderator
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Oct 2002
Location: Sunnyvale
Posted: 9th Mar 2005 23:39
Link
Yes, of course - but that's not the problem. Probably 99.9% of the people here would use it as intended, then that 0.1% will use it to flame forum users. So we'd be in a situation where there's a horrible post about you somewhere that you can't reply to (or anyone for that matter), and it'd sit waiting for a moderator to find it. It's easy to find hot-topics because they're at the top of the page, but a nasty comment in a locked thread sinking down into page 2 is not so easy to notice.


Van-B


It's c**p being the only coder in the village.
Back to top
Profile PM Email
the_winch
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 1st Feb 2003
Location: Oxford, UK
Posted: 9th Mar 2005 23:44
Link
Quote: "Then imagine this, people have posted in a genuine thread, and some wally comes along and starts spamming, isnt it smarter for the creator to lock the thread and make sure at least more than 50% of it is valid material?"


Wouldn't it be better for the discussion to continue and a mod delete the spam?

Even if a mod isn't arround why does it matter if 50% of it is spam? Better to have a thread half full of spam than an thread missing information because it was locked before some people got the chance to contribute.

Quote: "this is not a quote"
Back to top
Profile PM Website
Kentaree
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Oct 2002
Location: Clonmel, Ireland
Posted: 9th Mar 2005 23:45 Edited at: 9th Mar 2005 23:46
Link
@VanB: That's where the "report to moderator" button comes in

@Winch: True, but its up to the creator of the thread, really. If he feels he has enough comments, he can lock it, otherwise he could report it to a mod.

Desktop: AMD Athlon XP2800+,Radeon 9800 128MB, 1GB DDR RAM
Laptop: AMD Athlon 64M 3000+,Mobility Radeon 9700 128MB, 512MB DDR RAM
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Hawkeye
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 19th Sep 2003
Location: SC, USA
Posted: 9th Mar 2005 23:46 Edited at: 9th Mar 2005 23:46
Link
I agree %100 with everything Van-B said (keeps me from having to type it all over in my words )


BECAUSE IT'S TEH TRUE!!!!1!11!!!one!

Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Three Score
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Jun 2004
Location: behind you
Posted: 10th Mar 2005 08:58
Link
@Van-B i agree

ok how about this as a list of updates
report to mod button instead of going thru an email system
private messaging
moving threads from board to board
renaming your title on your own thread
locking your own thread (but must be verified by a mod)
being able to edit or delete attachments and code boxes


ummm anythjing i missed?

quit hiting the computer; computers can only do what they are told so we must be telling them to do wrong things
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Sol462
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 12th Sep 2004
Location: playing with the spazookeedoo
Posted: 10th Mar 2005 09:16 Edited at: 10th Mar 2005 12:05
Link
NULL

Back to top
Profile PM Website
MikeS
Retired Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 2nd Dec 2002
Location: United States
Posted: 10th Mar 2005 09:47
Link
Quote: "report to mod button instead of going thru an email system"

Agree

Quote: "private messaging"

Could be useful.

Quote: "moving threads from board to board"

Negative. Just ask a mod to move it.

Quote: "renaming your title on your own thread"

Maybe, but I'd prefer to just keep the title as is.

Quote: "locking your own thread (but must be verified by a mod)"

Negative. Notifying a mod to lock your thread is a bit redundant, rather than just having a mod do it by himself.

Quote: "being able to edit or delete attachments and code boxes"

Code boxes can be edited, don't know about the source boxes. I agree on editing attachments though(Might save apollo some space).

Overall, self-moderation would never work here(or at least not well), in my opionion. It's good to give users control, but not to much. Things would also become a bit messy and complicated, and every thread would be locked after a few days, only to see a clone of that thread two days later.



A book? I hate book. Book is stupid.
(Formerly known as Yellow)
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Dave J
Retired Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 11th Feb 2003
Location: Secret Military Pub, Down Under
Posted: 10th Mar 2005 09:59 Edited at: 10th Mar 2005 10:01
Link
We never (and I can't stress this enough) delete threads unless it was posted with the deliberate intention of including unacceptable content such as offensive images, etc. In 99% of cases we will lock the thread because it gives us a chance to explain why it was locked and it prevents other users from posting "What happened to thread blah?" when they realise it's missing. The only other reason we delete threads is if someone 'accidentally' posts two (or more) of the exact same thread, but that only ever happens a few times a year.

We encourage users to post the solution to their problem if they have a question and find the answer before someone else can help them, this allows other users who have the same problem to come across the thread and see how to fix their problem without having to repost the same question.

The only reasonable suggestions I can see in this thread are the "Report to Mod" button and the 'edit attachment' thing (which we can actually already do, I didn't realise users couldn't though).


"Computers are useless, they can only give you answers."
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Three Score
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Jun 2004
Location: behind you
Posted: 10th Mar 2005 10:19
Link
ummm and the search thing fixed either that or have the title the title of hte thread instead of "the game creators-forum-view thread" because in google u get a million results and all the same title

quit hiting the computer; computers can only do what they are told so we must be telling them to do wrong things
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Dave J
Retired Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 11th Feb 2003
Location: Secret Military Pub, Down Under
Posted: 10th Mar 2005 11:09
Link
Yeah, I'd have to agree with that one as well, it's also easier to tell which browser window is what thread if you switch between multiple ones.


"Computers are useless, they can only give you answers."
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Three Score
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Jun 2004
Location: behind you
Posted: 10th Mar 2005 11:25
Link
or tabs in the case of firefox

quit hiting the computer; computers can only do what they are told so we must be telling them to do wrong things
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Required
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 25th Feb 2005
Location: Server Down
Posted: 10th Mar 2005 15:09
Link
Everything I have seen said so far fits why we should not have an Edit feature.

In fact there is more chance of the Personal Messaging System being abused, as you would have to post forward messages to Moderators.

Each time I see a new excuse to why not for Self-Moderatoration, the more I see the Moderators against it because they believe it will give them more work.

If just one of the moderators could admit this directly then progress might be able to be achieved.

System: Windows XP CPU: AMD Athlon 2600+ RAM: 512MB Video: GeForce FX 5200 Audio: C-Media 9739 DirectX: Version 9.0c
Back to top
Profile PM Website
Jimmy
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 20th Aug 2003
Location: Back in the USA
Posted: 10th Mar 2005 15:15
Link
Required: What the crap do you know? You've only been here a couple weeks. Maybe stick around a bit and get to know how the forum works, then post your opinion. Noob.


Well we all shine on, like the moon, and the stars, and the sun.
Back to top
Profile PM Website
Dave J
Retired Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 11th Feb 2003
Location: Secret Military Pub, Down Under
Posted: 10th Mar 2005 16:09
Link
Quote: "Each time I see a new excuse to why not for Self-Moderatoration, the more I see the Moderators against it because they believe it will give them more work.

If just one of the moderators could admit this directly then progress might be able to be achieved."


Admit what? That we think it'll create more work for us? That's what we've been saying!


"Computers are useless, they can only give you answers."
Back to top
Profile PM Email
IanM
Retired Moderator
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 11th Sep 2002
Location: In my moon base
Posted: 10th Mar 2005 20:59
Link
There are some good ideas, and some not so good here. I'll just pick up a few of the most memorable ones ...


Locking threads:

Once someone else posts into your thread with code or an opinion, they have as much 'ownership' of that thread as the original poster. In addition, just because the OP has finished with the thread, doesn't mean that everyone else has.


Deleting threads:

Even worse!


Private messaging:

Maybe if the 'projects area' thing happens, then it would be worth adding, but until then, I don't see a reason for TGC's server to handle what is effectively just an email system.


Report to mod:

Yes, but rather than an email-based system, something like the 'post approval list' page would be better.


Moving threads:

I don't think that this is a good idea - it gets confusing enough when us mods move them. It could also be abused by spammers moving their posts around and stopping us from deleting/locking them.


Renaming threads:

Don't know ... shouldn't we expect people to name their threads correctly in the first place? Again, it could be abused by spammers playing 'hide the post'.

*** Coming soon - Network Plug-in - Check my site for info ***
For free Plug-ins and source code http://www.matrix1.demon.co.uk
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Ian T
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 12th Sep 2002
Location: Around
Posted: 11th Mar 2005 03:11
Link
If you want to lock and delete your own threads, make your own forum. End of story.

It is a perilous occupation for TGC to post anything by way of a promise, as the words get etched in indestructable marble for all time.
-Lee Bamber
Back to top
Profile PM
Three Score
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Jun 2004
Location: behind you
Posted: 11th Mar 2005 08:07
Link
dang well it was worth a shot
and be sure to fix that search thing though

also being able to edit ANY post in a thread and edit and delete attachments and source boxes

quit hiting the computer; computers can only do what they are told so we must be telling them to do wrong things
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Damokles
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 28th May 2003
Location: Belgium
Posted: 11th Mar 2005 15:00
Link
Here are my suggestions :

Report to mod : Apparently it would make the work of the mods easier. (Most seem to agree)

Renaming threads : It should exist, but in this way : We write the new title, then the mods can see both titles and have a button to approve it.

- Mind the gap -
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Lukas W
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Sep 2003
Location: Sweden
Posted: 11th Mar 2005 15:17
Link
I got a suggestions for improving apollo myself:

Sort Threads by Read/Unread, Date (like it is now), user/author, locked/unlocked.. that would clean up the forum for most users..

and if we sort by read/unread it will start with the blue posts (unread) and will sort them by date.

get the idea? i think this will be very usefull

This is a Map Editor
Lukas Hangout
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Dave J
Retired Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 11th Feb 2003
Location: Secret Military Pub, Down Under
Posted: 11th Mar 2005 15:48
Link
Quote: "also being able to edit ANY post in a thread"


What do you mean edit 'any' post in a thread? If you mean edit any of your own posts, you can already do that. But if you mean edit any of other peoples posts as well, then that's the dumbest idea I've ever heard.


"Computers are useless, they can only give you answers."
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Jeku
Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posted: 11th Mar 2005 16:58
Link
I think the renaming of topics is really only necessary for the W.I.P. and Announcements boards. For example if I release Game v.0.5 and put that in the title, then make modifications and update it to 0.6, I want the thread title to reflect it (rather than create a whole new thread).

That is the only case I can see for this feature. Spelling mistakes and other typing mishaps give forums the "community" feel, I think


--[GameBasic - Coming Soon]-- ^^^ banner generously designed by TheBigBabou
Back to top
Profile PM Website
Three Score
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Jun 2004
Location: behind you
Posted: 12th Mar 2005 12:08
Link
umm i cant edit any post except for my most recent post in a thread

quit hiting the computer; computers can only do what they are told so we must be telling them to do wrong things
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Dave J
Retired Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 11th Feb 2003
Location: Secret Military Pub, Down Under
Posted: 12th Mar 2005 12:18
Link
Well you'd be the only one, I believe.


"Computers are useless, they can only give you answers."
Back to top
Profile PM Email
SageTech
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Dec 2004
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posted: 12th Mar 2005 13:16 Edited at: 12th Mar 2005 13:19
Link
Quote: " have a better idea, to hell with self moderation! Instead we hire 7 mods who have no sense of rational thought. Then we let them run through Banning, locking, deleting and editing till they get tired and go to sleep. Then when they wake up, it'll start again. "


[joke] i fit the catagory!! [/joke]

hmmm, perhaps the joke tag isnt neccesary...

Sage Tech Manager
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Back to top

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2024-11-27 02:28:27
Your offset time is: 2024-11-27 02:28:27