Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

Geek Culture / lol what a silly resolution

Author
Message
indi
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 26th Aug 2002
Location: Earth, Brisbane, Australia
Posted: 24th May 2005 21:42
Link
I was doing some print work on my older 800 mhz g4 with 1.5 gigs of ram and i noticed that the screen res was a little different. I looked into it and found it was one notch up from the usual size i have, then i explored viewing the forum at the highest res this older machine can get up to.

click the image for a laugh, its so illegible at that size. 2048 x 1538

I have to check my g5 now with only one monitor as two of them reduces the screen res.

If no-one gives your an answer to a question you have asked, consider:- Is your question clear.- Did you ask nicely.- Are you showing any effort to solve the problem yourself

Attachments

Login to view attachments
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Lukas W
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Sep 2003
Location: Sweden
Posted: 24th May 2005 22:03
Link
wow, macs are cool

Back to top
Profile PM Email
Hawkeye
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 19th Sep 2003
Location: SC, USA
Posted: 24th May 2005 22:15
Link
My god that's seriously gigantic Now do you understand why you check the avabile display modes BEFORE setting them??? I actually saw a blitz proggy trying to run at that resolution (2048 x 1538)

...which of course is a whole new topic all by itself

Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Richard Davey
Retired Moderator
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Apr 2002
Location: On the Jupiter Probe
Posted: 24th May 2005 22:20
Link
Looks good here I do quite like the "wide-screen" format of the Macs. Your dock is ultra tiny though!

Two Worlds and in Between
Hot Metal and Methedrine
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Lukas W
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Sep 2003
Location: Sweden
Posted: 24th May 2005 22:22
Link
how many hertz can you run with that resolution?

Back to top
Profile PM Email
Raven
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 23rd Mar 2005
Location: Hertfordshire, England
Posted: 25th May 2005 00:14
Link
60Hz..
you know the desktop resolution all depends on the size of the monitor and person using it.

I find 2x1K to be a very good resolution on a 23" Monitor

An example more to what people would be used to here though.
14" 1280x1024 is illegiable but at 17" it's resonable, though on that 1600x1200 is illegiable but at 21" it's fine.

So just about the hardware.

Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Lukas W
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Sep 2003
Location: Sweden
Posted: 25th May 2005 02:07
Link
ive always used 1280x1024 @ 60hz on my 17" CRT.
2 days ago i switched to 1024x768 @ 85hz.
now guess was i surprised, everything moves so fast, and is so cool!
i can sit all day just moving the mouse wathcing the arrow move across the screen!

Back to top
Profile PM Email
Eric T
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 7th Apr 2003
Location: My location is where I am at this time.
Posted: 25th May 2005 02:10
Link
I do 1152x864 @ 75hz. Its really comfortable on the eys and works great on my monitor. But that 2048x1538 would be awesome to use.... if only my monitor could take it

http://blog.myspace.com/erict
An Alternative to Mouse's blog. Now with more lowbrow opinions.
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
David R
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Sep 2003
Location: 3.14
Posted: 25th May 2005 02:13
Link
TFT here.... So I can't use anything above 1024x768 (my display's limit- which is annoying. Plus its only 15" ) . Oh well.

[url=www.lightningstudios.co.uk][/url]
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Lukas W
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Sep 2003
Location: Sweden
Posted: 25th May 2005 03:48
Link
haha

on me dads laptop he runs 1152x864 @ 80hz i think.
and that laptop runs DoomIII at High res mode with 1024x768 with NO lag though he doesn't use AA... but its quite cool

Back to top
Profile PM Email
David T
Retired Moderator
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 27th Aug 2002
Location: England
Posted: 25th May 2005 04:55
Link
I like 1152 x 900 on my 17in TFT - just right right balance between 1280 and 1024.

Facts are meaningless.
You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Megaton Cat
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Aug 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posted: 25th May 2005 09:00
Link
Do people all the sudden think they're too good for 1024x768???

It's M-E-G-A-T-O-N. NOT MEGATRON.
DON'T MAKE ME GET THE RABBIT.
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
PiratSS
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Oct 2002
Location:
Posted: 25th May 2005 09:05
Link
I agree with Megatron, I still ues 1024x768, it's more than enough!
Back to top
Profile PM
Dazzag
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 26th Aug 2002
Location: Cyprus
Posted: 25th May 2005 17:47
Link
My old 19" CRT can run at over 2000, but is only for people who want to be able to see past their nose come their 40th birthday Personally I've used 1600x1200 on >=19" screens for some years, and love it. Currently my main machine has a 1600x1200 panel using DVI on a 20.3" screen with 16ms response (fastest I could find at the time for the resolution). Tis nice. Especially when you rotate it and use 1200x1600 mode for viewing things like this forum. Tops. Although my laptop knocks out something like 1920x1200 at 15.4" widescreen. You would have thought this would have been too small, but everything is seriously crisp and clear. Plus I'm not Mr Magoo so don't suffer any problems.

As far as I'm concerned I find it hard to program in anything less than 1600x1200. Then again I have had over half a decade to get used to the resolution. This is also in Visual Studio though, so you need a bit more space a lot of the time. Work is kind of annoying (1280x800 or whatever on 17") although at least they upped the specs lately (3Ghz P4 effort) and everything is now in black. Nice.

Cheers

I am 99% probably lying in bed right now... so don't blame me for crappy typing
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
David T
Retired Moderator
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 27th Aug 2002
Location: England
Posted: 26th May 2005 00:53
Link
Quote: "Do people all the sudden think they're too good for 1024x768???"


Yes - to pixellated on my screen.

Facts are meaningless.
You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Sephnroth
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Oct 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posted: 26th May 2005 01:08
Link
I use 1280x1024 on my 17inch crt. I just cant go down to 1024x768 anymore.. its too blocky and everything is too big. When you're trying to work in a modeler, photoshop or even just working with exceptionally long lines of text you learn to rejoice over every extra pixel you can fit on your screen. I just couldnt imagine doing my photoshop artwork in 1024x768 anymore x_x

[07:16:59-pm] « Sephnroth » you were dreaming about lee...
[07:17:13-pm] « Mouse » stfu
[07:17:22-pm] « Mouse » he was hanging himself lol
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Benjamin
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Nov 2002
Location: France
Posted: 26th May 2005 09:47
Link
I use 800x600. Anything above hurts my eyes after a while, meaning I have to take a break, which just wastes time that I could be spending programming.


"Lets migrate like bricks" - Me
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Scraggle
Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Jul 2003
Location: Yorkshire
Posted: 26th May 2005 09:54
Link
I use 2560 x 1024 - two 17" monitors side by side. I set it up like that initially just to see if I could but now I would be lost without it.


Back to top
Profile PM Email
Neofish
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 7th Apr 2004
Location: A swimming pool of coke
Posted: 26th May 2005 10:35
Link
Although I don't have resolutions that big, two 1024x768 monitors is great one for music.....

Pi = 8
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Dazzag
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 26th Aug 2002
Location: Cyprus
Posted: 26th May 2005 20:40
Link
Personally I quite liked an option I had for my main monitor. Basically a frame that allows 4 of the same monitor (2 on top, 2 on bottom). Basically gives an overall size of 40.2" diagonal (not including black borders around screens of course) with a total resolution of 3200x2400. Although the three screens in a row frame is also pretty neat, giving a resolution of 4800x1200. Mmmmm. Hmmm, I can also rotate for a 1200x1600 resolution. If you did the same thing for the quad frame then you would get 2400x3200. Even better for forums....

Cheers

I am 99% probably lying in bed right now... so don't blame me for crappy typing
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Back to top

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2024-11-27 15:36:42
Your offset time is: 2024-11-27 15:36:42