Is C# a doable language with the SDK?

Author

Message

Alexa Too

19

Years of Service

User Offline

Joined: 21st Sep 2005

Location:

Posted: 21st Sep 2005 10:51

Link

Also, is it better to stick with C++ for speed (i.e. non-interpreted/parsed such as managed languages)?

Any pointers in language selection are welcome (in terms of the SDK and in game programming in general).

Thanks,
Alexa

Back to top

Profile PM

OSX Using Happy Dude

21

Years of Service

User Offline

Joined: 21st Aug 2003

Location: At home

Posted: 21st Sep 2005 12:47

Link

Yes, C# wont work with DarkSDK - dont directly anyway. Best to stick to C/C++

Come to the third DarkBasic Pro Sci Fi Con - Be there and be square
Blog:http://spaces.msn.com/members/BouncyBrick/
Web Site:http://www.nicholaskingsley.co.uk

Back to top

Profile PM Email Website

Raven

19

Years of Service

User Offline

Joined: 23rd Mar 2005

Location: Hertfordshire, England

Posted: 21st Sep 2005 16:24

Link

DGSDK is designed to link through the .lib and header files.
For C# you'll need to exther export a class dll via C++, or use the DLLs to import all of the functions.

To be honest, C# with DirectX9 and Application Framework (provided as part of the SDK) isn't that much more difficult that using DGSDK.

Back to top

Profile PM Email Website

Alexa Too

19

Years of Service

User Offline

Joined: 21st Sep 2005

Location:

Posted: 21st Sep 2005 16:33

Link

Sounds like I should go with C++ for ease.

Thanks for the input guys.

Alexa

Back to top

Profile PM

AndLabs

19

Years of Service

User Offline

Joined: 7th Dec 2004

Location:

Posted: 21st Sep 2005 22:33

Link

And the million dollar question now is: can DGSDK be ported to C#? YES! C# was built for the .net framework, which is mostly dlls, so why not compile both the DGSDK and DirectX SDK as a dll and build a C# compiler that uses both SDKs as resources, like with the .net framework?

TGC WORKERS PLEASE READ THE ABOVE!! THAT GOES DOUBLE FOR YOU, LEE!!

For the Software You Want, AMPERSAND LABORATORIES is the place!

Back to top

Profile PM Website

OSX Using Happy Dude

21

Years of Service

User Offline

Joined: 21st Aug 2003

Location: At home

Posted: 21st Sep 2005 22:40

Link

Doubt Lee has any intention of converting it to C# - there is no need to anyway.

Come to the third DarkBasic Pro Sci Fi Con - Be there and be square
Blog:http://spaces.msn.com/members/BouncyBrick/
Web Site:http://www.nicholaskingsley.co.uk

Back to top

Profile PM Email Website

IanM

Retired Moderator

22

Years of Service

User Offline

Joined: 11th Sep 2002

Location: In my moon base

Posted: 21st Sep 2005 23:46

Link

Quote: "can DGSDK be ported to C#? YES!"

That is 100% correct, but let's take a closer look ...

It took around 6 man-years (probably) to get DBPro and DSDK to this stage ... now you want the guys to port to a completely different language? Let's just assume that it'll take half that time to port - 3 man-years, divided by the two primary coders, makes a year-and-a half... Assuming that they spend no more time on FPSC, bug fixes, or new functionality.

Strike 1.

It's enough work to keep the current single-language implementation maintained, so you also want to double their workload once they do have it running under another language.

Strike 2.

With these commands compiled into DLL, the DLLs would need to be distributed with any game you ship. If they are .NET, that opens them up to anyone being able to use them without having bought the product. If you read the license agreement, you'll see that this is specifically covered, and is not allowed, probably for this very reason.

Strike 3 - you're outa here

For free Plug-ins and source code http://www.matrix1.demon.co.uk

Back to top

Profile PM Email Website

AndLabs

19

Years of Service

User Offline

Joined: 7th Dec 2004

Location:

Posted: 22nd Sep 2005 22:37

Link

OK:

So? C# is C++ made easy, so it is easier to port to C# than, say, Euphoria.

Rebuttal 1.

Compile the original code as DLLs and build a C# compiler especially for those dlls, like TGC built the DBPro compiler.

Rebuttal 2.

If you build your own C# compiler to build programs for your own .dll framework, there is no need to include .net

Rebuttal 3 - I'm still in.

For the Software You Want, AMPERSAND LABORATORIES is the place!

Back to top

Profile PM Website

OSX Using Happy Dude

21

Years of Service

User Offline

Joined: 21st Aug 2003

Location: At home

Posted: 22nd Sep 2005 23:17 Edited at: 22nd Sep 2005 23:18

Link

It still takes time... Plus each user would have to make sure .Net is installed.

It just wont happen.

Come to the third DarkBasic Pro Sci Fi Con - Be there and be square
Blog:http://spaces.msn.com/members/BouncyBrick/
Web Site:http://www.nicholaskingsley.co.uk

Back to top

Profile PM Email Website

AndLabs

19

Years of Service

User Offline

Joined: 7th Dec 2004

Location:

Posted: 22nd Sep 2005 23:23 Edited at: 22nd Sep 2005 23:24

Link

Yes, it will take time, but about the it just won't happen part:

Wrong, wrong, WRONG! You are concered with "C# is for .net" while the fact is "Visual C# is for .net, but C# can be ported, just like any other similar language." Unless Microsoft copyrighted C# so that one could not make a custom compiler for it (which I think absurd), go make a C# compiler that does NOT use .net, but compiles for another DLL! If you want, I can show an example, but I will need a long post.

For the Software You Want, AMPERSAND LABORATORIES is the place!

Back to top

Profile PM Website

OSX Using Happy Dude

21

Years of Service

User Offline

Joined: 21st Aug 2003

Location: At home

Posted: 22nd Sep 2005 23:29 Edited at: 22nd Sep 2005 23:31

Link

Quote: "Wrong, wrong, WRONG!"

Wrong, wrong, wrong! Do you expect Lee to start learning C# any time soon ? There is quite a big difference...

Didn't know C# could be ported. Very nice of Microsoft to let us...

Come to the third DarkBasic Pro Sci Fi Con - Be there and be square
Blog:http://spaces.msn.com/members/BouncyBrick/
Web Site:http://www.nicholaskingsley.co.uk

Back to top

Profile PM Email Website

AndLabs

19

Years of Service

User Offline

Joined: 7th Dec 2004

Location:

Posted: 23rd Sep 2005 00:55

Link

C# is simple to learn because it is an offset of C++.

Here is an example.

Let's say you wrote a DLL in C++:

/*
EasyWriteConsole DLL
A Console Output DLL
By Pietro Gagliardi
22 September 2005
*/

// Includes
#include <iostream>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <cstdio>

// Function Declarations
void Write(char *c);
void Write(int i);
void Write(double d);
void WriteLn(char *c);
void WriteLn(int i);
void WriteLn(double d);
void WriteLn();
void WriteErr(char *err);
void WriteErr(int id);
void Bell();
void WaitKey();

// Write :: Writes output to the console and leaves the cursor there
// VERSION ONE: *c = A string of chars (char* format)
void Write(char *c) { cout << *c; }
// VERSION TWO: i = An integer (int format)
void Write(int i) { cout << i; }
// VERSION THREE: f = A floating-point value (double format)
void Write(double f) { cout << f; }

// WriteLn :: Writes output to the console, makes a newline, and leaves the cursor there
// VERSION ONE: *c = A string of chars (char* format)
void WriteLn(char *c) { cout << *c << endl; }
// VERSION TWO: i = An integer (int format)
void WriteLn(int i) { cout << i << endl; }
// VERSION THREE: f = A floating-point value (double format)
void WriteLn(double d) { cout << d << endl; }
// VERSION FOUR: No parameters. Simply prints a newline.
void WriteLn() { cout << endl; }

// WriteErr :: Writes errors to the screen.
// VERSION ONE: *err - A string error (char* format)
void WriteErr(char *err) { Bell(); puts(err); }
// VERSION TWO: id - An integer defining which OS internal
//  error to output (int format)
void WriteErr(int id) { Bell(); puts(strerror(id)); }

// Bell :: Dings the system bell. No parameters.
void Bell() { cout << "\a"; }

// WaitKey :: Waits for the user to press a key. No
//  parameters.
void WaitKey() { cout << "\n"; system("pause"); }

+ Code Snippet

/*
EasyWriteConsole DLL
A Console Output DLL
By Pietro Gagliardi
22 September 2005
*/

// Includes
#include <iostream>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <cstdio>

// Function Declarations
void Write(char *c);
void Write(int i);
void Write(double d);
void WriteLn(char *c);
void WriteLn(int i);
void WriteLn(double d);
void WriteLn();
void WriteErr(char *err);
void WriteErr(int id);
void Bell();
void WaitKey();

// Write :: Writes output to the console and leaves the cursor there
// VERSION ONE: *c = A string of chars (char* format)
void Write(char *c) { cout << *c; }
// VERSION TWO: i = An integer (int format)
void Write(int i) { cout << i; }
// VERSION THREE: f = A floating-point value (double format)
void Write(double f) { cout << f; }

// WriteLn :: Writes output to the console, makes a newline, and leaves the cursor there
// VERSION ONE: *c = A string of chars (char* format)
void WriteLn(char *c) { cout << *c << endl; }
// VERSION TWO: i = An integer (int format)
void WriteLn(int i) { cout << i << endl; }
// VERSION THREE: f = A floating-point value (double format)
void WriteLn(double d) { cout << d << endl; }
// VERSION FOUR: No parameters. Simply prints a newline.
void WriteLn() { cout << endl; }

// WriteErr :: Writes errors to the screen.
// VERSION ONE: *err - A string error (char* format)
void WriteErr(char *err) { Bell(); puts(err); }
// VERSION TWO: id - An integer defining which OS internal
//  error to output (int format)
void WriteErr(int id) { Bell(); puts(strerror(id)); }

// Bell :: Dings the system bell. No parameters.
void Bell() { cout << "\a"; }

// WaitKey :: Waits for the user to press a key. No
//  parameters.
void WaitKey() { cout << "\n"; system("pause"); }

If you use a C++ compiler, you can compile that to a DLL.

Now all you need to do is build a C# compiler that compiles the application and expects the DLL in the system folder. That is frameworking!

For the Software You Want, AMPERSAND LABORATORIES is the place!

Back to top

Profile PM Website

AndLabs

19

Years of Service

User Offline

Joined: 7th Dec 2004

Location:

Posted: 23rd Sep 2005 00:57

Link

PS - A good namespace for that DLL would be the DLL's filename minus the extnsions. So if the DLL is "easycon.dll", then your C# program would use this command:

+ Code Snippet

using easycom;

This way, one would not have to use easycom.WriteLn(); .

For the Software You Want, AMPERSAND LABORATORIES is the place!

Back to top

Profile PM Website

AndLabs

19

Years of Service

User Offline

Joined: 7th Dec 2004

Location:

Posted: 23rd Sep 2005 00:57

Link

PSS - I am Pietro Gagliardi.

For the Software You Want, AMPERSAND LABORATORIES is the place!

Back to top

Profile PM Website

OSX Using Happy Dude

21

Years of Service

User Offline

Joined: 21st Aug 2003

Location: At home

Posted: 23rd Sep 2005 00:58

Link

And you expect Lee to do that ???
Why not convert DBPro to a Mac and Linux while he's at it?

Come to the third DarkBasic Pro Sci Fi Con - Be there and be square
Blog:http://spaces.msn.com/members/BouncyBrick/
Web Site:http://www.nicholaskingsley.co.uk

Back to top

Profile PM Email Website

IanM

Retired Moderator

22

Years of Service

User Offline

Joined: 11th Sep 2002

Location: In my moon base

Posted: 23rd Sep 2005 01:13 Edited at: 23rd Sep 2005 01:16

Link

Quote: "So? C# is C++ made easy, so it is easier to port to C# than, say, Euphoria."

Yep, that's why I said it'd take half the time.

If it's so easy to convert C++ code to C#, then it must be just as easy for *you* to write in C++ in the first place. After all, C# is a simplified version of C++, right?

Quote: "Compile the original code as DLLs and build a C# compiler especially for those dlls, like TGC built the DBPro compiler."

So now they've got to build a new compiler too huh? How many man-years will be required to reproduce the C# compiler? *YOU* haven't even built the compiler you were designing yet, but you expect TGC to do this.

Before you suggest it, TGC can't take the compiler from the Mono project either - that's GPL code, and would mean that TGC would need to ship source code for their version of the compiler on request - once GPL, always GPL.

Quote: "If you build your own C# compiler to build programs for your own .dll framework, there is no need to include .net"

So you also expect them to design and build a new library format too, and just for fun, make it totally incompatible with the official C#?

Please, think it though, huh? Just a little?

[EDIT]
I've just realised nick - You're the one for sarcasm, so why am I having to do your job for you?

For free Plug-ins and source code http://www.matrix1.demon.co.uk

Back to top

Profile PM Email Website

scooby bloke

20

Years of Service

User Offline

Joined: 4th Nov 2004

Location:

Posted: 23rd Sep 2005 12:43

Link

c# is slower than c++. Not really what you want when making games. It's mainly to do with the automatic memory management / garbage collection etc. You can write much faster code in c++, it just looks more complicated because you have to do everything yourself...

Back to top

Profile PM

OSX Using Happy Dude

21

Years of Service

User Offline

Joined: 21st Aug 2003

Location: At home

Posted: 23rd Sep 2005 13:09 Edited at: 23rd Sep 2005 16:52

Link

Quote: "I've just realised nick - You're the one for sarcasm, so why am I having to do your job for you?"

Because late at night you want easy reading sarcasm, not the full action version

Come to the third DarkBasic Pro Sci Fi Con - Be there and be square
Blog:http://spaces.msn.com/members/BouncyBrick/
Web Site:http://www.nicholaskingsley.co.uk

Back to top

Profile PM Email Website

AndLabs

19

Years of Service

User Offline

Joined: 7th Dec 2004

Location:

Posted: 23rd Sep 2005 22:05

Link

Errrr!

Since the DGSDK libraries are written in C++, all they have to do is compile them to DLLs! C# is simplified, but it is 100% object-oriented. I was just throwing an idea around.

If you are still interested, here is a little C# code that you might like to see that implements the library I made.

+ Code Snippet

// If the DLL was called EasyCon

class mainClass
{
   public static void Main()
   {
      EasyCon.Write("Dark");
      EasyCon.WriteLn("BASIC");
      EasyCon.Write(1);
      EasyCon.WriteLn(.13);
      EasyCon.WriteLn();
      EasyCon.Beep();
      EasyCon.WriteErr("Sorry! That was the last version, so: ");
      EasyCon.WriteErr(2);
      EasyCon.WaitKey();
   }
}

For the Software You Want, AMPERSAND LABORATORIES is the place!

Back to top

Profile PM Website

AndLabs

19

Years of Service

User Offline

Joined: 7th Dec 2004

Location:

Posted: 23rd Sep 2005 22:06

Link

And I don't build compilers, but I plan to. Check my "How To Make a Compiler Easy" thread if you want to help me by giving me a suggestion.

For the Software You Want, AMPERSAND LABORATORIES is the place!

Back to top

Profile PM Website

IanM

Retired Moderator

22

Years of Service

User Offline

Joined: 11th Sep 2002

Location: In my moon base

Posted: 24th Sep 2005 00:10

Link

1. DSDK is 100% not object orientated.

2. .NET DLLs are not standard DLLs, and it would take time to convert the code over to fit the .NET standard. The alternative would be to write a .NET wrapper that would call a DSDK DLL, and that would probably take more time to do it thast way.

3. Shipping DLLs means that anyone can use them. You probably haven't been around long enough to remember, but I wrote an interface library for DBPro plugin writers that allowed you to call the DBPro command functions from your own plugins, and the hardest part was automating the generation of the code, not producing the code.

One last statement, then I'm done with this thread : IT'S NOT GONNA HAPPEN.

For free Plug-ins and source code http://www.matrix1.demon.co.uk

Back to top

Profile PM Email Website

Alexa Too

19

Years of Service

User Offline

Joined: 21st Sep 2005

Location:

Posted: 24th Sep 2005 01:09

Link

Wow. I step away for a day and all heck breaks loose!

Alexa

Back to top

Profile PM

AndLabs

19

Years of Service

User Offline

Joined: 7th Dec 2004

Location:

Posted: 24th Sep 2005 01:27

Link

OK, I'm cool with that.

For the Software You Want, AMPERSAND LABORATORIES is the place!

Back to top

Profile PM Website

OSX Using Happy Dude

21

Years of Service

User Offline

Joined: 21st Aug 2003

Location: At home

Posted: 24th Sep 2005 01:51

Link

Quote: " OK, I'm cool with that."

Good to hear!

Quote: " Wow. I step away for a day and all heck breaks loose!"

You should see what happens when someone makes a spelling mistake...

Come to the third DarkBasic Pro Sci Fi Con - Be there and be square
Blog:http://spaces.msn.com/members/BouncyBrick/
Web Site:http://www.nicholaskingsley.co.uk

Back to top

Profile PM Email Website

Cellbloc Studios

20

Years of Service

User Offline

Joined: 15th Mar 2004

Location: Atlanta, GA

Posted: 25th Sep 2005 11:34

Link

All you need for spelling mistakes is to look at just about any posting in the FPSC Forums! It's like I walked into a kindergarten class!

-This...is my boomstick!

Back to top

Profile PM Website

Sorry your browser is not supported!

Dark GDK / Is C# a doable language with the SDK?