Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

Author
Message
snowdog
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 12th Sep 2005
Location: London
Posted: 11th Oct 2005 15:34
For the first time I started to mess around with shaders last night and found that with shaders selected the game was hovering between 7-10 fps. Looked great but ran like a pile of old poo.

My system specs are: AMD Athlon XP 2800+ (2.09Gb), 1 Gb RAM, Nvidia GeForce FX 5200.

The map in question was just a couple of rooms (lab and control room prefabs) seperated by a maintenance passageway to see how the thing would run.

I have downloaded the latest drivers for my graphics card and it supports pixel shading. My PC is well within the minimum spec associated with FPSC but whilst it looks great it runs too slowly to even think about playing.

I ran it with just shaders and no light mapping but didn't make any difference.

Any suggestions?

*Keeps fingers crossed nobody says 'Get a new graphics card'*



Duncan Edwards is the one person who, even today, I really felt inferior to. I've never known anybody so gifted and strong and powerful with the presence that he had - Sir Bobby Charlton
Raven
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 23rd Mar 2005
Location: Hertfordshire, England
Posted: 11th Oct 2005 16:24
FX 5200 has a crap fillrate, even the damn GeForce 3 has 3x the fillrate. So it can't do shaders quite a well as... well frankly it's crap at them.

This said the FPSC ones aren't exactly optimised.

snowdog
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 12th Sep 2005
Location: London
Posted: 11th Oct 2005 17:48
Aw bum...so in other words "Get a new graphics card"

Duncan Edwards is the one person who, even today, I really felt inferior to. I've never known anybody so gifted and strong and powerful with the presence that he had - Sir Bobby Charlton
Zero #43
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th May 2004
Location: ** in your head **
Posted: 11th Oct 2005 18:44
get the ati radeon 9800 pro 256mb AGP or pci E or pci... or whatever... get the 9800 pro

Intel® Pentium® 4 Processor w/ HT Technology 3.4GHz 800MHz FSB w/ 512KB Cache, 1GB DDR PC-2700 at 333MHz - 1x1024 SO-DIMM, ATI RADEON™ 9550 256MB DDR(<<soon ), 80GB Hard Drive
Origin
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 11th Sep 2005
Location:
Posted: 11th Oct 2005 22:06
ATI sapphire 9600 pro Atlantis!

Cheap and King Of the AGP mountain

Or X800 pro (King of the PCIex mountain)

"if you=n00b then askForHelp()=ok
else askForHelp()!=ok"
Zone Chicken
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 25th Jan 2004
Location: `~-..-~`~-..-~`
Posted: 12th Oct 2005 00:19
I just want to for warn you about ati and fpsc with shaders, some people have been having problems with the shaders others have not.

I have a ATI (Connect3D) Radeon X850 XT Platinum Edition 256MB DDR3 pci-e graphics card and v1 shaders do not work at all. I have read some other thread of people using different models of ati cards having the same problems. So what ati card will or will not work with fpsc right now in its current state is really a shot in the dark.

Your signature has been erased by a mod -- please resize to under 600x120...
Zero #43
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th May 2004
Location: ** in your head **
Posted: 12th Oct 2005 00:47
okk... here is my shader working card: ATI "MOBILITY" RADEON 9700 PRO AGP 128MB DDR3

Intel® Pentium® 4 Processor w/ HT Technology 3.4GHz 800MHz FSB w/ 512KB Cache, 1GB DDR PC-2700 at 333MHz - 1x1024 SO-DIMM, ATI RADEON™ 9550 256MB DDR(<<soon ), 80GB Hard Drive
Raven
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 23rd Mar 2005
Location: Hertfordshire, England
Posted: 12th Oct 2005 00:48
Quote: "Aw bum...so in other words "Get a new graphics card""


Well that was the ghist, but to be honest. If your just using it for FPSC I wouldn't bother.

The Shader Version over Non-Shader is barely noticeable really.
Hardly worth the high-end card you need to bloody run them at any-rate.

snowdog
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 12th Sep 2005
Location: London
Posted: 12th Oct 2005 01:57
I like the look of the shader one better...but have done another 2 room thingy just to have a look again and it's working fine. I think it was the lab that was messing things up - the thing with all the windows. Not going near that again lol.

Trouble is that the shader thingy is a bit dark. Don't want to add lights as it'll slow down my multiplayer (and am not sure if you can add lights to a mp anyway?)...when I press the '>' key a few times to adjust the gamma it looks a lot better...but is there a way so that the game starts at that gamma setting automatically without users having to press the thing..?

Am assuming it's going to be in the setup.ini somewhere but am not sure what to change!

Duncan Edwards is the one person who, even today, I really felt inferior to. I've never known anybody so gifted and strong and powerful with the presence that he had - Sir Bobby Charlton

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2024-11-23 19:20:29
Your offset time is: 2024-11-23 19:20:29