Well, Riker 9 will be a good thing... but for most people with really bad frames per second problems, 70% will just raise their current framerate of maybe 5 Fps to about 8 or maybe 9.... what still results in an unplayable game.
Anyway, I will wait for Riker 9.... if a simple one room games will still result in eyepain, I gonna return FPSC as it simply can not do what it promises.....
And for anyone going to complain again... "switch off your antivirus or do better leveldesign"... no that's not the cause. The 3D engine behind FPSC is simply BAD.
No doubt about that!
I can run Batlefield 2 at 1024x768/32 with good leveldetails, effects etc at 68 Frames per second, but can not run the one room demo that came with FPSC at frame rates higer than 7.... then it is definately not my fault. Anyway, FPSC is a good program.. meant for the cool editor... but the finished games are so unplayable that I don't think, anyone out there will ever really play games created with FPSC or even sell such a thing..... FPSC v1 should be more FPSC v0.1 beta.... there is so much to improve before that piece of software is usable, that it shouldn't have been sold in its current state of development....
