Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

3 Dimensional Chat / Way to make an anagraph scene

Author
Message
Mucky Muck Ninja
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Sep 2003
Location: im not entirely sure
Posted: 5th Feb 2006 20:47
I was just fiddling around with the 3d glasses i found in my bro's room and wanted to show how I got a 3d anagraph scene.


Here is how I made it. I created the scene as normal, which was somewhat simple considering it was just a test, but you can use as complicated a scene as you want. I set up my camera and set it to track the focal point of the scene. Then I duplicated the camera and moved it a little to the side of the first camera. The new camera continued tracking the focal point, so I then had two 'eyes' looking at the focal point. Then I rendered the scene from each camera, and named one Red, and one Blue, for reference. I then loaded up both the images in GIMP, and changed the color balance to full red for all settings on the red image, and full blue for all settings on the blue image. I made each one of them have an opacity of 50%, and pasted one ontop of the other. I changed the pasted images opacity to 50, anchored it, and then brought the whole images opacity back to 100. Then you just need to look at it through glasses! That was a lot of text w/o picts lol so if you dont' understand please ask.

''From now on we will travel in TUBES!'' ~Tenacious D
"It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes."
~ Douglas Adams
The crazy
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 20th Jan 2005
Location: Behind you
Posted: 5th Feb 2006 21:59
Hm, it seems amazing. I went and grabbed some 3d glasses, but it didn't work. You must have the blue and red ones right? Cuz I've got the kind of clear ones. Oh well, also, is there a difference between stereoscopic and anagraphic?

Your signature has been erased by a mod because it's larger than 600x120...
n3om0rph
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 14th Aug 2005
Location: Croatia
Posted: 5th Feb 2006 22:32
Cool

Mucky Muck Ninja
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Sep 2003
Location: im not entirely sure
Posted: 5th Feb 2006 23:14
Yes they have to be red/blue. It doesn't really matter which 2 colors as long as the left camera has the same camera as the left part of the glasses and same with the right.

''From now on we will travel in TUBES!'' ~Tenacious D
"It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes."
~ Douglas Adams
Oddmind
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 20th Jun 2004
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posted: 6th Feb 2006 03:13
If your like me and you dont have 3d glasses anymore...



formerly KrazyJimmy
Seppuku Arts
Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Aug 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posted: 6th Feb 2006 18:55
Grabs a jigsaw, puts ups to moniter, cuts out glasses.....oops lol...ment to print first

Well all I need now is a printer, card, scissors and cellophane I think I might buy the glasses instead...only if new where sold them

Nice scene btw


"I want to put a bullet through my head everytime I think of you!!!"- Slayer
Mucky Muck Ninja
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Sep 2003
Location: im not entirely sure
Posted: 7th Feb 2006 01:45
Lol, you can tell how much work i put into it can't you :p

grr as soon as i find these glasses my bro comes in and breaks them!! They were from that spy kids 3d movie lol.

''From now on we will travel in TUBES!'' ~Tenacious D
"It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes."
~ Douglas Adams
IanG
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 25th Sep 2004
Location: Cyberspace
Posted: 7th Feb 2006 17:03
atleast you all can use those 3d glasses - i can't use them as i can only see out of one eye at a time, so it's just like closing one of your eyes, shame really as i'd like to see what it looks like


amd athlon xp 2600+,1280mb,FX 5200 128mb,200gb,xp pro sp2
dark coder
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 6th Oct 2002
Location: Japan
Posted: 8th Feb 2006 11:45
shouldent you have rotated the cameras rather than move them? as closer objects are supposed to have less of a shift to them right? and farther ones more but in your pic the spheres at the front and back both seem to have the same r/b shift?.

Halowed are the ori.
Mucky Muck Ninja
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Sep 2003
Location: im not entirely sure
Posted: 8th Feb 2006 16:40
Well if you focus on one thing, isn't the stuff in front just as blurry as the stuff in back? I dunno maybe i did it wrong tho im not sure what you mean by rotated instead of moved..
If I only rotated the cameras w/o moving them they wouldn't be next to eachother like real eyes.

''From now on we will travel in TUBES!'' ~Tenacious D
"It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes."
~ Douglas Adams
IanG
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 25th Sep 2004
Location: Cyberspace
Posted: 8th Feb 2006 18:46
you have got to remember that your eyes do look at the same point (well yours do, mine don't) so you would have to rotate the camera round the focus of the view, other wise the preception of depth won't quite work


amd athlon xp 2600+,1280mb,FX 5200 128mb,200gb,xp pro sp2
Mucky Muck Ninja
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Sep 2003
Location: im not entirely sure
Posted: 8th Feb 2006 23:55
I know, i have both cameras tracking the focal point of the scene, which is the cube.

''From now on we will travel in TUBES!'' ~Tenacious D
"It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes."
~ Douglas Adams

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2024-11-27 07:37:50
Your offset time is: 2024-11-27 07:37:50