Quote: "The USA isn't free. Who decides if we go to war? "
Theoretically, it's free with its constitution granting freedom of speech and press, and expression, etc..
The freedom of Religion that exists here is real.
But, as you mention, corruption has turned our political system into corporate puppets.
Without getting into a political debate, which was not my intention, I'll just say you are right.
There is no freedom where any laws exist, which means no country is truely free.
We are talking about using the real color of blood (red) which nature chose not us.
I'm not talking about why nations go to war for real, or any political statistics.
I'm talking about making a video game.
What's next? No real guns in the FPSes. Get your water pistols out!
Its preposterous, but its their country so they can do what they want.
In this country we can have red blood in a game, and thats free enough for me on that subject.
@TGC
Is that all shades of red that are restricted?
Do they base it off the RGB since it is a law pertaining to computer data used for images?
I was just wondering how precisely the restriction on the "red" was defined.
There are purples, tans, and even yellows that have a higher R value than G or B in the RGB triplet.
@cooler piet
Stick with a dark blue or something so it has a higher B value than R.
Blood is a purplish blue in the vains before it is exposed to lots of oxygen anyway.
That would be semi-real but should be legally considered blue if the B is the highest value.
That should keep the GameStopO from coming after you for using purple or yellow blood that has a RGB combo with R having the highest value.
