OK, I'm slightly upset.
First off let me just say that I still think the work that the DB team has done on the competition is great. Having a page for each and every entry is much appreciated and obviously took a lot of work.
Next - they made some mistakes. I've checked the copy of the form I emailed to Rich - and I did indeed put down the name of the game that my entry was based on. From my review:
Quote: "Quite what Overdroid is a remake of is beyond us. "
You should know - I told you in the application form.
Also - the game had no crash bugs in the final entry I sent. Here is a copy of the confirmation email I got from Rich.
Quote: "Hi,
Monday, April 7, 2003, 6:22:36 AM, you wrote:
JL> Note: I changed the filename so there will be no confusion
JL> www.playdatabase.com/overdroid/finalod.zip
New version downloading now. Will replace older one with this.
Cheers,
Rich"
The final entry that I had submitted was at 10pm (my time). The date and time stamp for the version that is up on the list of retro entries now (which I assume was tested and judged - since the crash bug was, and is, still present) is 9:28AM. The older version was NOT replaced with the last one I sent.
These are two mistakes that were made by some one else - NOT BY ME - and it is remotely possible that they may have altered my standing in the compo. Now, I'm not saying I would have won if not for these mistakes (and actually I don't believe that I would have), but it does very much bother me that my work is presented in this negative context - especially since It's not my fault.
All I ask is that the most recent version of my game replace the one that is currently available. I realize that Rich is probably very busy and sleep deprived after the comp, but it drives me crazy to think that people might download an example of my work that is unfinished or buggy.
Cheers,
Joseph.
"Talk is cheap because supply exceeds demand."
- Unknown.