Quote: "aero graphics (transparancy and all of those other bells and whistles)"
Why? because it looks better? Lets use an old argument against you...
FireFox looks like crap. Internet Explorer is very sleek and good looking. Which is "better".
Quote: "dx10 support"
DX9.0L (Besides the fact that DX 10 isn't backwards compatable)
Quote: "it is a 64bit os (unless you get vista starter)"
Windows XP64... ohh... ahhh... yep, not much to brag about (execpt for nerdism)
Quote: "build for dual core processors, and the new quad core."
How? As I see it, a dual core processor automatically sections the instructions off into two streams and reconstitutes them after it is finished. Software only communicates with hardware... but in the end run, it is the hardware that preforms the task.
P.S. It would be better to get a dual processor mother board than waste money on a quad-core processor... not enough speed boost effect.
Quote: "faster, if your computer has the hardware."
lol... okay. lets see. If I run HL1 on my computer, will it run faster or slower than HL2? My computer has the HARDWARE to RUN HL2... I personally can't care WHAT jeku says on this matter, but if all things were fair, the system that uses the least resouces would run faster. But since XP and Vista are very close in release dates, I would expect any speed increases to come from the hardware, not the software.
Quote: "etc.etc. i could go on for a bit."
Please DO.
If you fear speaking for yourself, make use the words of others while discovering your own voice.