Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

Dark GDK / Maybe a small bug in DGDK

Author
Message
frstPrsn
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 13th Apr 2006
Location:
Posted: 22nd Dec 2006 18:36
Link
It says in your documentation that dbLoopAnimation with coordinates are supported, but while programming in DGDK.net only dbLoopAnimation(int animindex) is supported.
Back to top
Profile PM
APEXnow
Retired Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 15th Apr 2003
Location: On a park bench
Posted: 22nd Dec 2006 20:08
Link
Both DGDK and DGDK.NET have the same functions implemented. Even if I examine the DGDK (C++) version, the dbLoopAnimation only has a single argument.

The PlayAnimation functions allow for co-ordinates though.

Paul.

Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
frstPrsn
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 13th Apr 2006
Location:
Posted: 22nd Dec 2006 21:25
Link
DBPro have that similar operation with coordinates. The thing is, I'm converting a DBPro program into DGDK.net so it seems like the codes are not one to one.
Back to top
Profile PM
CattleRustler
Retired Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Aug 2003
Location: case modding at overclock.net
Posted: 22nd Dec 2006 21:45 Edited at: 22nd Dec 2006 21:47
Link
if converting dbp to dgdk.net then dont expect that all the code will be 1 to 1, expect it to be very very close however.

infact dgdk will be closest to 1 to 1 with dgdk.net, dbp is another story



Its 9/11 - but its FAKE 9/11 Ts=SQRT(Df/16)
Back to top
Profile PM
frstPrsn
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 13th Apr 2006
Location:
Posted: 22nd Dec 2006 23:09
Link
ok... I just thought i let you know.
Back to top
Profile PM
Morcilla
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 1st Dec 2002
Location: Spain
Posted: 23rd Dec 2006 12:46 Edited at: 23rd Dec 2006 13:10
Link
[EDITED]

Well done, I think that's good to know.

If you search the equivalent of



I think it is just named differently:



It seems it does exist after all

So how complex is that program that you are converting? (commands used, etc.)
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Back to top

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2024-09-28 23:15:18
Your offset time is: 2024-09-28 23:15:18