Well, it's all fine with me - I just meant that it was odd that it happened at the same time
So anyways, in my opinion the rules should be a bit broader, especially when it comes to the time limit. It's just plain annoying to have set time frames when composing; one might have to end up leaving out great parts and can't let the inspiration flow as free as it should be allowed to. I know, I'm currently working on a contribution to a musical contest where the songs have to be between 2:45 and 3:00 - it's a pain.
I suggest that the times are at least greatly prolonged from 45 -60 secs, or, preferably, removed alltogether (I sincerely doubt that anybody would write something longer than a few minutes anyways, but if their idea so requires, I think it should be allowed).
About the looping part, that's probably good, but I don't know if it has to be a restriction that only looping tracks are permitted to enter. (I myself seldom write truly looping music, as I suck at mixing the final product so that it actually loops seamlessly). I'll leave this decision to the community however.
About the formats, why not allow standard mp3 and wma files too?
Or do the ogg format allow for cue points?
Actually, not too few people can't even playback ogg vorbis by default, so perhaps that should be reconsidered.
Also, if we're to deal with a not-too-high bandwidth server, downloading wave files of decent resolution can take quite long.
(Typically 41KHz files take around 10 Mb per minute).
About the prizes, I don't really know. I don't think I have anything in particular to offer anyways. Maybe, just maybe, it isn't the greatest prize to offer a music pack for winning a composing contest however
If you had some other reward ideas, please post them up
On the other hand, while prizes might attract more contestants, it really isn't such a big necessity for a contest like this, I think. Just so that you know
I'm looking forward to hear how this will turn out.
"I kören hörs de brummande busarna Björnligan och Gondolen"