Simple:Tell me why is it that you didn't just give RGT'ers a link to the jon jones archive when asked for those drawings instead of simulating that you were working on them?What's up with that,isn't that sneaky?
And why do you call it 'Dirt' if it's not?
...and to think this is what got you respect when you arrived on RGT(at least from me).
That ridiculous attempt at making seem that I'm evading the subject with that 'covering your tracks' is even more patheticly ironic if you look again at the said RGT post where,as YOU would interpet it,YOU did send people away from that site giving other URLS such as Onovamm Braam's blueprint site,a big mistake because the controversial Ref Drawings in question are also available on this site since it's opened...
Why never even mention that these images were there when asked for some refpic artwort if that was already done and published on two of the most popular digital reference images site?i can't follow you there.
Since the last update of the JJ archive was a year before you supposedly drew them,why not giving away the URL?As if you wouldn't've been proud enough.
Which anyways contradicts the fact that you said you were gonna make some and came up with the now-said 'old work' later on(therefore you lied to the RGT community),it's more than just re-using hands isn't it?
About those copyright issues,personally there's nothing I'm worrying about,because I'm not the one using any intellectually copyrighted products to my marketting advantages or using 3dsmax as a commercial render tool.
My use of 3D is for personal hobbyism while you're in it for the money,this is where our pathways separate and where the definition of dedication takes all it's meaning...
BTW: Overall I only have a few hours of painting experience,so I'm not ahsamed of what I do in 2d.
Everyobdy wants to be loved,But no one loves everybody...
HEY!!! I'm the one who had 'Cyberspace' in his location on the older black forums,shame on you Rich j/k