Quote: "Finding extra-terrestrial life would be human-kind's biggest discovery, and it would change our understanding of the universe and our place in it. Our politics would change, out global ethics would change, it would mark a new era in human history. The other ideas won't. They answer scientific questions, not human ones."
o.o
I don't think it would change anything... We know (some estimates of) the odds of life existing, so it exists *somewhere*.
I don't think any one mission should be prioritized over any other, and they all should be done eventually. Options 1 and 2 are about finding experimental evidence of theory (DEFINITELY IMPORTANT!!!), and option 3 is about getting information for future missions. I'd say they're equally important in the long run, but for now, I'd go with option 1. We've never seen a black hole before! We just know that *something* exists there, not really *what* it is! We also have never found direct experimental evidence of gravitational waves. For all we know physicists and astronomers could be totally wrong about black holes. While it's unlikely, you just can't insist on something you haven't observed! that's what separates the scientists from the crackpots! (and ever once in a while that genius with a hunch xD)