48÷2(9+3)
The question is whether it evaluates to this (in RPN)
* ÷ 48 2 + 9 3
or this:
÷ 48 * 2 + 9 3
I'd say with the algorithmic approach of "PEMDAS", evaluating the equation looks like this:
48÷2*12 //Parentheses first
48÷24 //then multiplication
2 //then division.
Errm, but as someone who's into computers, I'd say that writing the equation like that in the first place is stupid! Graphing calculators evaluate the statement to 288, and so does wolfram alpha, while the main "PEMDAS" approach (my class was taught that in teh USA/CA at least) shows that the answer is two!
If I want something to be calculated exactly how I say it should be, then RPN or many parentheses is the way to go.
(or writing it out on paper, so you have horizontal lines n stuff)

Tell me if there's a broken link to images in a thread I post, and I'll fix 'em.