Quote: "His interpretation of the constant to "stabilise the universe" was incorrect, and was removed for a time, then reintroduced to account for a different anomaly that he hadn't realised (Dark Matter and Dark Energy)."
Who is to say that one intuitive understanding of a constant is any more correct than another? If you look at the equations you can see that the constant could be interpretted to arise from any of the other terms in the equation, it's not important which one you choose as they all give the same physical result, it just happens that one interpretation (dark energy, vacuum energy, etc.) has become more popular than others. I think it's more insightful of him that he didn't immediately assume that it would be zero, which is what most people did at the time... Yes, based on no evidence Einstein guessed that the universe was static. When presented with evidence to the contrary he changed his mind, that's how science works.
[b]
