Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

Geek Culture / Does anyone else's brain register 'clear' as a color?

Author
Message
Diggsey
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Apr 2006
Location: On this web page.
Posted: 1st Jun 2012 16:34 Edited at: 1st Jun 2012 16:35
Quote: "His interpretation of the constant to "stabilise the universe" was incorrect, and was removed for a time, then reintroduced to account for a different anomaly that he hadn't realised (Dark Matter and Dark Energy)."


Who is to say that one intuitive understanding of a constant is any more correct than another? If you look at the equations you can see that the constant could be interpretted to arise from any of the other terms in the equation, it's not important which one you choose as they all give the same physical result, it just happens that one interpretation (dark energy, vacuum energy, etc.) has become more popular than others. I think it's more insightful of him that he didn't immediately assume that it would be zero, which is what most people did at the time... Yes, based on no evidence Einstein guessed that the universe was static. When presented with evidence to the contrary he changed his mind, that's how science works.

[b]
Benjamin
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Nov 2002
Location: France
Posted: 1st Jun 2012 16:42
Quote: "When presented with evidence to the contrary he changed his mind, that's how science works."


Heresy! Once you've made up your mind you should defend it to the death and never bother to re-evaluate it!



Support a charitable indie game project!
Pincho Paxton
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Dec 2002
Location:
Posted: 1st Jun 2012 18:21
Quote: "When presented with evidence to the contrary he changed his mind, that's how science works."


In our lifetimes we don't have time to wait for the corrections. I am happy with the physics that I have now, and they are not very similar to the scientific versions. If you want the truth, you shall die before the truth is ever established.

Indicium
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 26th May 2008
Location:
Posted: 1st Jun 2012 18:23
Please don't use your physics outside your simulations, in that case.

Pincho Paxton
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Dec 2002
Location:
Posted: 1st Jun 2012 18:24 Edited at: 1st Jun 2012 18:25
They don't change anything at our scale. You just know what is going on at lesser scales. Most physics are averages of smaller particles, and averages always even out.

Indicium
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 26th May 2008
Location:
Posted: 1st Jun 2012 19:04
No they're not. The scale of physics are completely different. That's why we have seperate rules for quantum physics than we do classical.

Pincho Paxton
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Dec 2002
Location:
Posted: 1st Jun 2012 21:03 Edited at: 1st Jun 2012 21:12
But I don't. I have standard physics that work their way up to lower powers of physics. Mountains are big sand, but the physics seem different, because of scale. The sand produces flow, and water-like qualities, the mountains would if you could put enough together, but you can't. The smaller you get, the more water-like the properties become. And spacetime is very water-like, and un-bonded. Physics are reproduced, but quantity, and scale changes the way they behave. Quantum physics in the current model is not entertaining the idea that the physics should maintain a gradient of change. The two slit experiment shows water-like qualities, but nobody is scaling the physics down properly. And mass, has the bar set in the wrong place. But I am not here to tell anyone how to fix physics, I only want people to start from scratch, and work upwards. I want to see if there is a different way to get what I have got.

Indicium
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 26th May 2008
Location:
Posted: 1st Jun 2012 23:16
We have the laws of physics because they work. If the same rules could apply to every situation we would save ourselves the effort in having different sets.

Pincho Paxton
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Dec 2002
Location:
Posted: 2nd Jun 2012 00:56 Edited at: 2nd Jun 2012 01:06
Yes, and how long do you want to wait for them? I didn't wait.

Indicium
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 26th May 2008
Location:
Posted: 10th Jun 2012 23:13
Wait for what?


They see me coding, they hating.
Dark Java Dude 64
Community Leader
14
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 21st Sep 2010
Location: Neither here nor there nor anywhere
Posted: 11th Jun 2012 02:20
Everything.

Pincho Paxton
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Dec 2002
Location:
Posted: 11th Jun 2012 02:28 Edited at: 11th Jun 2012 02:29
Quote: "...the same rules could apply to every situation"


Quote: "Wait for what?"


...wait for the same rules to apply to every situation. If we could have them we would, and so we will, because we can have them. I have figured them out, and I won't be the last person to figure them out.

Indicium
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 26th May 2008
Location:
Posted: 11th Jun 2012 02:42
There won't ever be rules that apply to every situation. That's like saying the rules of Java and C++ will be the same if you wait long enough.


They see me coding, they hating.
maho76
13
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 31st May 2011
Location: universe-hub, playing the flute
Posted: 11th Jun 2012 14:30
Quote: "There won't ever be rules that apply to every situation."


called world-formular, searched by heisenberg,einstein and tried to avoid with dark matter by hawkins. geniuses and followers no success yet.

Pincho Paxton
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Dec 2002
Location:
Posted: 11th Jun 2012 16:35
Quote: "There won't ever be rules that apply to every situation. That's like saying the rules of Java and C++ will be the same if you wait long enough."

No it's like saying Java, and C++ use the same binary system.

RUCCUS
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 11th Dec 2004
Location: Canada
Posted: 12th Jun 2012 18:25
Seems to me you've been programming iOS apps too long;



Nateholio
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Dec 2005
Location: I\'ve Been Everywhere
Posted: 12th Jun 2012 20:34
Quote: "view.backgroundColor = [UIColor clearColor]"


*Laughs and keeps derogatory comments about a certain fruit company to himself*

In Development: K96 - Combat Simulation
Keep your Hope and Change, I choose individual Liberty!
Image All
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Dec 2005
Location: Home
Posted: 12th Jun 2012 23:34
this is what this thread made me think of
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5lDSjuo67LM#t=7m31s

Indicium
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 26th May 2008
Location:
Posted: 13th Jun 2012 00:45
Quote: "No it's like saying Java, and C++ use the same binary system."


The brilliant thing about that is, the difference is the same.


They see me coding, they hating. http://indi-indicium.blogspot.co.uk/

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2025-05-22 07:12:16
Your offset time is: 2025-05-22 07:12:16