I'm not sure, probably get a share on new purchases. Thing is, I'm glad I got this bundle before those games were added - because I already bought Meat Boy and Braid - but that means the dev of Lone Survivor loses out. It's not like we can decide which devs get what percentage. I mean, doesn't the bundle system have to change, they can't just include old games every time, like paracites absorbing funds that should go to the dev's of games you don't already own!.
It cheapens the whole thing, when they include games from past bundles, as if buying them once isn't enough. It might seem like 100% win to have Braid and MeatBoy included, but the way I see it, that detracts from the money that the other devs are entitled to. Would be good if past-featured games don't take any money, like they're bonus items, and the devs don't get a percentage from that bundle. The developers of Meat Boy said in an interview that the Humble Bundle will eventually hamper sales of their own games, and that they don't make much money through Humble Bundle - you'd think that with that idea, they wouldn't be so quick to whore-out Meat Boy... the IOS version is probably out soon as well - just how much money do these people have to make on the back of that poor lump of beef!
As I said, I wouldn't be surprised if the structure of Humble Bundle changes soon... wonder if it'll end up more like a club, where we can swap our doublers with people, and having a whole collection leads to rewards, like early access to new bundles, demos etc. Theres a lot they could do to avoid my rants I reckon
Health, Ammo, and bacon and eggs!
