Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

AppGameKit Classic Chat / a Question - check it out.

Author
Message
haliop
User Banned
Posted: 15th Jul 2013 22:13 Edited at: 15th Jul 2013 22:25
haliop
User Banned
Posted: 15th Jul 2013 22:14 Edited at: 15th Jul 2013 22:26
Edit : Patent Waiting.



Mods Please Delete This Thread.

unlikely
12
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Mar 2012
Location: Ohio, USA
Posted: 15th Jul 2013 22:31 Edited at: 15th Jul 2013 22:37
Ah.. I see you edited your posts while I was replying...


---------------------

1920x1080 images in a few KB, eh? What kind of image data are we talking here? Woodland scene photography, or simple vector-style graphics? Some lossless algorithms can squeeze some images into a very small size, while others they struggle with (.png). Some algorithms do well with complex data (.jpg), but offer few other benefits (e.g, lossy, ineffective on simple data, etc.) Is it lossy? Is it most efficient at complex data or simple? Does it support alpha?

Interesting claims you have made here. If it is as good as you claim, you should patent it asap. However, to be a Johnny Raincloud, lots of research has been going into image (and data more generally) compression techniques for decades now.........
Markus
Valued Member
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Apr 2004
Location: Germany
Posted: 15th Jul 2013 22:32
Are you sure of it?

there are variant factors to get this small size.
haliop
User Banned
Posted: 15th Jul 2013 22:46
haliop
User Banned
Posted: 15th Jul 2013 23:50

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2024-05-04 00:27:51
Your offset time is: 2024-05-04 00:27:51