Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

Geek Culture / Superluminal communication, here we come!

Author
Message
Seditious
User Banned
Posted: 4th Nov 2013 19:43
... Or so many article seem to be implying at the moment.

http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/169874-ntt-entangle-photons-300-kilometers-apart

As far as I'm aware it's currently believed that FTL-communication is impossible, but these articles are claiming otherwise? I always thought quantum entanglement couldn't be used to transfer information.

Your erased has been moderated by signature.
Libervurto
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Jun 2006
Location: On Toast
Posted: 4th Nov 2013 22:19 Edited at: 4th Nov 2013 22:34
I happened to take out two library books on quantum mechanics today, so hopefully I will be able to give a good answer before they have to be returned!

I don't see how this is transmitting any data. For data to be transmitted, we would need to know the state of one of the particles, and as far as I know once a particle's state has been measured the two are no longer entangled. If it were the case that we could change the polarization, for example, of a particle and witness its partner 500km away flip polarity instantaneously then we would already be capable of faster than light communication.

It strikes me as odd that the diagram shows both photons being emitted from the same source. They would have to be emitted at some time of course, but for data to be transmitted between them the focus should be on containing the photons at their destination and manipulating them to transmit data instantly.

This seems like a big misunderstanding of what the experiment is about. I can't help questioning the scientific pedigree of the writers when two of the six "You might also like" links are about sexy celebrity Halloween costumes.


Formerly OBese87.
Blobby 101
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 17th Jun 2006
Location: England, UK
Posted: 5th Nov 2013 10:28 Edited at: 5th Nov 2013 10:28
I read that as "superliminal".



Seditious
User Banned
Posted: 10th Nov 2013 04:25 Edited at: 10th Nov 2013 04:26
I think it's a case of non-scientists reporting on science. If FTL communication were found to be possible it'd be a massive achievement for science.

Quote: "I don't see how this is transmitting any data. For data to be transmitted, we would need to know the state of one of the particles, and as far as I know once a particle's state has been measured the two are no longer entangled. If it were the case that we could change the polarization, for example, of a particle and witness its partner 500km away flip polarity instantaneously then we would already be capable of faster than light communication.
"


Right but how do we know that they are entangled in the first place? That's something I've never understood.
Phaelax
DBPro Master
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 16th Apr 2003
Location: Metropia
Posted: 12th Nov 2013 05:31
Quote: " I always thought quantum entanglement couldn't be used to transfer information."


I would think any thing that can be controlled in some manner can technically relay information. As long as you control it with consistent recognizable patterns, I don't see why not.

Neuro Fuzzy
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 11th Jun 2007
Location:
Posted: 13th Nov 2013 01:46
Just sayin': if you get faster than light communication, you get communication back in time. Period. Plain and simple. They're the same thing.


"I <3 u 2 bbz" - Dark Frager
Indicium
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 26th May 2008
Location:
Posted: 13th Nov 2013 16:08
Awesome. My programs can be compiled before I even write it.


They see me coding, they hating. http://indi-indicium.blogspot.co.uk/

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2025-05-16 20:50:50
Your offset time is: 2025-05-16 20:50:50