Hello, this post is not mine, but it says what I want to know very clearly:
Quote: "While trying out my new TV this week, I noticed that my 3D version of Disney's A Christmas Carol was incredibly clear and looked "normal" (turns out I was having problems getting my PS3 to output in 3D) without glasses. I know very little about 3D right now as I just haven't bothered reading up on it that much. But I thought 3D blurays would look blurry or at least different. I didn't know it was possible to play a 3D bluray in a 2D player and have it play like a normal disc. Today I came across an article on 3D's final specs, and it stated that 3D discs will be backward compatible with existing 2D players and will still have full 1080p output. If that's the case, then why put out 2 different versions of a movie? Why have the standard bluray and 3D bluray available separately? I bought the 4 disc Disney's A Christmas Carol when it came out, and I only got the 4 disc version with the 3D disc because it ended up being cheaper than the 3 disc because of the coupon I got from Disney's site. But why even have a 4 disc? Is it so companies like Disney can charge extra for a "more disc" version? Or perhaps is it because of the little extra that 3D takes up on the disc there's not enough room for extras?"
I can watch 3D and 2D with PowerDVD, it allowed me to watch Hobbit 1 3D in 2D mode - but with some rare artifats.
All your TGC are belong to us.