Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

Geek Culture / [LOCKED] Americans: you were lied to - lets forget partisanship and demand answers!

Author
Message
CattleRustler
Retired Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Aug 2003
Location: case modding at overclock.net
Posted: 10th Jun 2005 22:54
Right, he did have wmd's in the years when he fought Iran, we sold them to him, because back then he was a great guy. Now when the world has reached Peak Oil (look it up) we have new, invented reasons for ousting him. To say he was horrible and its ok anyway is revisionist and is circular logic. Who made us the world police? And dont say Matt Stone and Trey Parker

DBP Stuff | AirAmericaRadio.com - The Left was never so right.
Kentaree
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Oct 2002
Location: Clonmel, Ireland
Posted: 10th Jun 2005 22:58
Quote: "Who made us the world police?"


I reckon it's Spotsworth (Team America for all those wondering, if you haven't seen it, watch it, for there is much thruth in it)

Desktop: AMD Athlon XP2800+,Radeon 9800 128MB, 1GB DDR RAM
Laptop: AMD Athlon 64M 3000+,Mobility Radeon 9700 128MB, 512MB DDR RAM
The Big Babou
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Feb 2003
Location: Cyberspace
Posted: 10th Jun 2005 23:06
Quote: " America's main reaosning was oil. But I don't mind. They need oil, so fighting for it is OK "


You're kidding, are you? I need a new car, oh my neighbour has a nice one, I shall kill him.
Fighting for Iraqs oil is NOT OK. Byuing it (as every other country does) would have spared many peoples lives.

... they call it a royale with cheese ...
Benjamin
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Nov 2002
Location: France
Posted: 10th Jun 2005 23:09
Quote: " I need a new car, oh my neighbour has a nice one, I shall kill him."

You can't do that, thats illegal! But seriously, I agree that it is not ok. Its illegal.


"Lets migrate like bricks" - Me
The Big Babou
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Feb 2003
Location: Cyberspace
Posted: 10th Jun 2005 23:10 Edited at: 10th Jun 2005 23:11
My neighbour doesn't even have a nice car.

... they call it a royale with cheese ...
DBAlex
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Oct 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posted: 10th Jun 2005 23:15
America allways had to get what it wants though...

This time it was oil...




AMD 64 3000 + 512mb RAM + 80GB HD + Radeon 9600se 128mb
http://www.dbastudios.cjb.net
CattleRustler
Retired Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Aug 2003
Location: case modding at overclock.net
Posted: 10th Jun 2005 23:27
Quote: "You're kidding, are you? I need a new car, oh my neighbour has a nice one, I shall kill him."


rofl

DBP Stuff | AirAmericaRadio.com - The Left was never so right.
Van B
Moderator
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Oct 2002
Location: Sunnyvale
Posted: 10th Jun 2005 23:46
Some polititians lied! OMG!

Frankly, the US is annoying the rest of the planet with it's world-police standpoint and it would be beneficial if they changed that approach. Countries are starting to avoid trading with the US already.


Van-B

Cellbloc Studios
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 15th Mar 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 00:34
CR, I don't understand what you want. If they pull Bush before a congress and fire him, then the VP will take over. If they fire him also, then the head of the House Takes over, if they fire him....

What I am asking is what's the point? I really could care less if Bush wakes up today and says "You know, I really didn't like Saddam because he wanted to kill my pops, so I was looking for any excuse to take him out".

Ok, now that he said that, now what? Should be pull off a coup?

The other point I think is admusing is insurgents are killing/bombing people because they want the US to leave. The US cannot leave because insurgents are killing/bombing people.

I can speak pretty clearly for a lot of Americans that we DO NOT want to be there at all (anymore). But we cannot leave as long as insurgents fight.

Oil. Do you realize how many jobs will be lost if we didn't have oil? Everything from people driving their cars to a person who takes a bicycle to work BUT their is oil to lube their generators in the factory where they make clothes. America with it's 275 million people will cease to exist. In my opinion, 3/4 of the people depend on the oil daily. So yes, it is all about oil.

World Police. I am here in Honduras, been here for about a year and I get to hear what a "3rd World" country says about America. They love it. They don't like the politics, but America does a HUGE help to countries all over the world. From meds, to blankets, to toilet paper, to training to make water facilities, etc. The little folks of the world could not live wihtout America.

Now they think Americans are arrogant, boastful, rude and pushy (just like the French) BUT they would drop everything, leave their family just for a chance to come here.

I don't see boatloads of cuban refugees heading to ANY other county EXCEPT America. I see people getting into the wheelwells of planes in England JUST to get to the America.

America gotta be doing something right.

-This...is my boomstick!
Benjamin
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Nov 2002
Location: France
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 00:38
Quote: "Now they think Americans are arrogant, boastful, rude and pushy (just like the French)"

The French aren't rude O_o


"Lets migrate like bricks" - Me
Van B
Moderator
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Oct 2002
Location: Sunnyvale
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 00:40
Quote: "
I don't see boatloads of cuban refugees heading to ANY other county EXCEPT America. I see people getting into the wheelwells of planes in England JUST to get to the America.

America gotta be doing something right.
"


Maybe being within swimming distance from Cuba?


Van-B

Hawkeye
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 19th Sep 2003
Location: SC, USA
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 01:09
I have GOT to move to teh uk...

Lost in Thought
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Feb 2004
Location: U.S.A. : Douglas, Georgia
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 01:15
Move to Canada. Canada seems to be the most neutral place around.

Cellbloc Studios
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 15th Mar 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 01:20 Edited at: 11th Jun 2005 01:36
Heck, I want to move to the UK just to I can be closer to the GamesWorkshop!

-This...is my boomstick!
David T
Retired Moderator
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 27th Aug 2002
Location: England
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 01:30
Spare me all the stuff about how Iraqis live is a totally free world now, singing in the streets and hugging all those wonderful American soldiers.

There was an article in The Times. It simply had 3 pictures.

One was of a Baghdad street in 2000. Very busy, people going about their daily business, buses everywhere. A normal middle eastern street.

Then it had a picture of the same street in 2002. Complete devastation.

Then it had a picture of the same street in 2004, after Bush proclaimed the war as "over". It was still devastated.

TBH if Iraq is going to stay how it is then we were better off not invading. Get rid of Saddam some other way. But please, spare me the sob stories.

Facts are meaningless.
You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.
Teh Go0rfmeister
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 17th Aug 2003
Location:
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 01:36 Edited at: 11th Jun 2005 01:38
Quote: " There might not be WMD's. But we have found Weapons that can do a whole lot of destruction"


you mean those puny misiles that didnt have enough range to even reach outside iraq's own borders?

<<edit: besides, look at the DEVISTATION our own weapons have done- not only in iraq>>

and i dont get all this "liberation" thing- we liberated iraq- freed the people from saddam's mighty tyranny.

amd i missing something here? as far as i knew iraq was a stable country. so what if saddam killed people who disagreed with him? its not like he's the only dictator to have done so.

before this war in iraq:
iraq was religeously tolerant. synagogues, mosques and churches were all built next to each other during saddam's reign.
there was actually some kind of public order
america's economy was relatively stable, and britain didnt have as much financial problems.

afterwards, there's now major conflict between certain religeous groups, theres bombs going off everywhere, major looting happened after the war broke out, and aid worker's werent picked off the street for ransom.

1) what liberating have we done?
2) don't we have our own problems?
Gil Galvanti
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 22nd Dec 2004
Location: Texas, United States
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 02:31 Edited at: 11th Jun 2005 02:40
Quote: "Spare me all the stuff about how Iraqis live is a totally free world now,"

When did i say totally free. Freeer? Yes. How can you argue with that? Its becoming a free country.

Quote: "One was of a Baghdad street in 2000. Very busy, people going about their daily business, buses everywhere. A normal middle eastern street.

Then it had a picture of the same street in 2002. Complete devastation.

Then it had a picture of the same street in 2004, after Bush proclaimed the war as "over". It was still devastated."

1) What do you expect after a war?
2) Thats a busy streetside not showing people being dragged out of their houses and murdered for saying they disagree with the government
3) Its not easy to rebuild a country.
4) Just because he said the war is over doesnt mean that magically all the insurgents stop fighting.
5) When he said the war was over he meant the major combat phase.
6) Its not what goes on in public, its what goes on "behind the curtain" that is bad.

Quote: "TBH if Iraq is going to stay how it is then we were better off not invading. Get rid of Saddam some other way."

How do you know if its going to stay how it is? Its getting better look at the # of attacks 3 years ago and the # of attacks today. Its hard yes, because kids at the age of 11 are forced into a terrorist group or into an insurgents group and given rocket launchers and an AK-47 and told to shoot at any Americans they can. Then if they dont want to or dont do that, they are strapped into a car, the accelerating pedal stuck, and a bomb strapped to him.

Quote: "spare me the sob stories."

Why? Dont you care about other people? Its reality, not "sob stories". Put yourself in their position.

Quote: "you mean those puny misiles that didnt have enough range to even reach outside iraq's own borders?
"

I mean the huge weapons caches that had missles capable of reaching the surrounding countries, killing people, and starting a war.

Quote: "<<edit: besides, look at the DEVISTATION our own weapons have done- not only in iraq>>
"

Yes, but countries like the US and the UK are responsible enough to own and use those weapons. We wouldnt use them to terrorize other countries and kill innocent people (civilian casualties due to misplaced missles, and being caught in a firefight or near a military target dont count). What do you think Iraq would do if they were given a nuclear bomb?

Quote: "amd i missing something here? as far as i knew iraq was a stable country. so what if saddam killed people who disagreed with him? its not like he's the only dictator to have done so.
"

So what? Your saying so what that millions of people were killed? So what that he killed people who disagreed? And you dont think thats wrong, you dont think that shouldve been stopped? I know its not the only dictator who's done so, but look at the past ones that did:
Rudolph Hitler-killed himself after he realized we were going to whip his butt
Joseph Stalin-The Cold War
hmmm....who else are you thinking of?
Afghanistan-whipped by the US.
Iran-probably our next target.
Anyone else?
Japan-nuked em, helped rebuild them into what they are now, one of the most advanced and richest country in the world. And they havent engaged in a war since.
That seems to be it...

Quote: "before this war in iraq:
iraq was religeously tolerant. synagogues, mosques and churches were all built next to each other during saddam's reign."

lol! Whered u get that from? It was a Islamic country that persecuted all other religions, Islamic extremist.

Quote: "there was actually some kind of public order
"

Yeah if you call getting beaten for showing an arm public order, and if you speak against the government being shot to death public order, or being murdered because ur not Islamic.

Quote: "america's economy was relatively stable, and britain didnt have as much financial problems.
"

What does the war have to do with America's economy? Do people think that George W. Bush has a lever that he can push up or down to control the economy? Why does he have anything to do with it? Its just the luck of the draw if you get a good economy, because you cant effect it as president.

Quote: "theres bombs going off everywhere, major looting happened after the war broke out, and aid worker's werent picked off the street for ransom.
"

There werent bombs going off everywhere because the insurgents werent trying to kill Americans. Major looting-people are taking advantage of the disorganization, just like in 9/11 (which really makes me mad). And there were no aid worker's before, lol.

1) what liberating have we done?

Quote: "we are allowing not only the high-ranking officials, but all citizens to be treated as a human. True story:
In Iraq, there were 3 women standing on a street corner, wearing their blue, cover-all, clothes, with the netting on the face. A breeze blew through which blew one of the womens sleeves up to her elbow. A nearby "law enforcer" then marched over and began beating her. She wasnt beaten to death, but she was beaten. This was caught on tape.
This is what it was like before we liberated the Iraqi people. Now they can walk freely around without their hoods and nets and long sleeves on.
"

Quote: "weve possibly, and probably, saved hundreds of thousands of lives, allowed for normal people to be treated humanly, and helped rebuild a country into a free, democratic country, instead of ruthless dicatorship?"

Quote: "found something much worse...the killings of innocent people by the thousands, the terrible medical care, the ruthless government, and the fear of thousands of people if theyd be dragged out of their house and shot in the night, or last another day. There are countless stories of people kissing liberating soldiers feet, children running up to them, and mother's thanking them, for giving their son and daughter a better future. Look at the many pictures of Iraqi's celebrating, hugging the soldiers, and dancing around, and on top of the statue of Saddam Huiessen when it was was torn down. We may not have taken WMD's out of Iraq, if there were or are any, but weve given millions upon millions of people better and safer lives. The soldiers that died fighting, died for millions of peoples freedom, which im sure that they do not now regret.
"

Theres ur answer .

Quote: "2) don't we have our own problems? "

Yes. But are they as serious as over there? Problems like people complaining because they dont get paid enough, in the business someone created, free enterprise, or drug use, which law enforcement tries there best to stop, or that were running low on gas for the millions of cars we actually have? Also cant we do two things at once? Just because you send the military away and concentrate the part of the government on the war thats supposed to concentrate on wars anyways doesnt mean we arent trying to fix our own problems at the same time, does it?

I just wish people would take pride in being American, all you look at is the bad things, but you dont compare it to other countries and dont look at the good things.

Video games…they take you places unreachable, unfeasible. Putting you in the book...putting you in the movie...putting you in a world, that before could only be imagined. expage.com/piratesmainpage.
Jimmy
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 20th Aug 2003
Location: Back in the USA
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 02:34
Haha, Rudolph Hitler...

David T
Retired Moderator
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 27th Aug 2002
Location: England
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 02:50
Quote: "Quote: "Spare me all the stuff about how Iraqis live is a totally free world now,"
When did i say totally free. Freeer? Yes. How can you argue with that? Its becoming a free country."


Its a warzone.

BTW - I was never actually talking to you directly. I wasn't having a rant at you or anything, no hard feelings

Quote: "Why? Dont you care about other people? Its reality, not "sob stories". Put yourself in their position."


There's loads of bad in the world, but I think it should be dealt with without causing as many problems as the Iraq war has.

Facts are meaningless.
You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.
Gil Galvanti
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 22nd Dec 2004
Location: Texas, United States
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 02:55
Quote: "Its a warzone."

Yes, right now, because of the heavy resistance. But weve given them a president and established the basis of a government over there.

Quote: "BTW - I was never actually talking to you directly. I wasn't having a rant at you or anything, no hard feelings
"

ahhh...ok, sry about that, i thought u were talking to me, i had said stuff about it and i thought u were responding .

Quote: "There's loads of bad in the world, but I think it should be dealt with without causing as many problems as the Iraq war has."

but the problems are caused by the insurgents, which need to be stopped. How else should/could we do it? I think its solved a lot more problems than its caused .

Video games…they take you places unreachable, unfeasible. Putting you in the book...putting you in the movie...putting you in a world, that before could only be imagined. expage.com/piratesmainpage.
CattleRustler
Retired Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Aug 2003
Location: case modding at overclock.net
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 03:02
Quote: "What does the war have to do with America's economy? Do people think that George W. Bush has a lever that he can push up or down to control the economy? Why does he have anything to do with it? Its just the luck of the draw if you get a good economy, because you cant effect it as president."


Holy crap, please tell me you are joking!

(atm I refrain from the "US Economy under GWB" fact listing mission, its not the topic here, but then again neither was "pro-war vs. anti-war" which many have chosen to make the thread about)

DBP Stuff | AirAmericaRadio.com - The Left was never so right.
Gil Galvanti
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 22nd Dec 2004
Location: Texas, United States
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 03:32
o, i didnt see Andy's responses to my long "essay". His post wasnt blue . Heres my responses .

Quote: "Weapons are meant to do a whole lot of destruction. "

yes, thats my point. If you give an irresponsible country weapons, what do you think theyll do?

Quote: "Many people who where privy to the discussions in the administration at that time have said that the administration wanted to annex Iraq and felt that 911 was a great opportunity to do so.
"

I dont understand why people think that we actually wanted to make Iraq part of America lol. We are training up their own people so they can function by themselves. The US isnt trying to get anymore territory than it already has .

Quote: "Of course the intelligence was ´faulty. The administration only wanted to hear about WMD's in Iraq, even if it came from the most unreliable sources they could find. As long as the sources said that Iraq had WMD's, they couldn't care less.
"

Why would they want to hear about them? Once again that brings us to the point that Bush drew the conclusion from intelligence given to him, so it wasnt his fault.

Quote: "The great thing about politics supported by the worlds most expensive military, is that you can do pretty much anything and you won't have to worry about consequences, because the blame can always be put on someone else."

Who's blaming someone else? And who are they blaming?

Quote: "Well, the prisoners in Abu-Ghraib, Gitmo and the general population of Iraq may not agree with that."

Once again, this is an isolated incident and cannot be substituted for all of Iraq. The general population of Iraq is glad we freed them.

Quote: "I've seen you refer to this before and there are several problems with it. "

I dont recall ever referencing to it on here before...
Also this story was told to me by someone who saw the video, i didnt see the video, so everything may not be completely correct.

Quote: "That's called a burqa and is rarely used in Iraq. It is extensively used in Afghanistan however.
"

Ok, thanks, i couldnt remember its name . It may have been in Afghanistan then...once again, i was told this story 2nd hand

Quote: "Iraq never had religious police, neither did Iraq have Hijab or Burqa imposed by law.
"

ok, sry, it was probably Afghanistan...

Quote: "then out of sheer cultural ignorance you assumed that this happens in all countries where there are muslims. Then you felt that this could be used to justify the US invasion of Iraq.
"

No, it wasnt cultural ignorance, i didnt assume i got the two mixed up. Please dont assume that im cultural ignorant. I never felt that this would justify the US invasion of Iraq, but my point was the persecution that was going on.

Quote: "Actually they can't. Before, the police enforced a strict anti religious policy in Iraq, which meant that any attempt to excersize sharia would be severely punished."

OK, they still dont have freedom of religion, of any religion, although it is a Islamic country, and therefore would wearing religious clothes not be considered excersizing your religion?

Quote: "The reality today is that women cannot leave their homes without being accompanied by a male family member."

That was the reality before the war. Today they can leave their homes, still possibly to be killed by the remaining Islamic extremist. Also you say that a woman cant leave without her husband, isnt this part of Islamic law? Making it a religious exercise?

Quote: "Those same armies are patrolling in front of schools and academic institutions refusing to let women enter, because their local islamic clerics believe that women should not go to school."

Ohh, this is what i love...First you say...
Quote: "the police enforced a strict anti religious policy in Iraq,"

but then you say:
Quote: "because their local islamic clerics believe that women should not go to school.[/"

Women are now allowed to go to school but it used to be illegal.

Quote: "My conclusion is that you are deliberately lying."

dont accuse me of deliberately lying.

Quote: "The plight of Iraqi and for that matter Afghan women have been covered extensively in the west, so when you say 'Now they can walk freely around without their hoods and nets and long sleeves on."

Yes it has been covered actually, who are you to make that statement? Do you even live in the US? I say that they can freely walk around because its not illegal anymore and its not legal to beat them to death. It still happens because of insurgents and Islamic extremists.

Quote: "It supported and sponsored Al-quaida and the whole Afghani mujahedin movement. "

We never supported a terrorist group. We may have supported what they were doing, because at the time it was not terrorism, but overthrowing a dictatorship.

Quote: "The US is killing more civilian iraqis than terrorists, it's just so easy to call them terrorists."

No they arent. Your adding in the amount of civilian deaths by car bombs, insurgents, and Islamic extremists to the count. Iraqi's are very very rarely killed purposefully by US soldiers.

Quote: "You mean spending millions on US companies charging hundreds of times what local iraqi contracters ask for, hiring mostly foreign workers.
"

I dont know what your talking about. Im talking about our giving them food, healthcare, water, and basic neccessities. Havent you ever seen videos of the people standing in the back of the army truck trying to hand out things to the tons of Iraqi's just trying to get some of it?

Quote: "But there is virtually no law-enforcement in Iraq. The only thing resembling law enforcement is the local clerics, their private armies and their reliance on sharia."

Actually yes there is. Havent you seen the training of Iraqi police by Americans? Havent you heard the reports from a casualty count include the title "Iraqi Policemen"? Havent you seen the police cars now? Havent you seen that the Iraqi Policemen are now taking over from the US soldiers?

Quote: ">If America didnt think he was doing a good job, why was he
>elected...twice?

He wasn't!

>Are you saying he didnt actually "win" either of those elections?
>What do you base this on?

The CEO of Diebold virtually guranteed that he would win, well in advance of the actual election. Computerized voting based on proprietary systems and software is unreliable and easy to tamper with."

Then why is he president?...Once again, the losers holding a grudge come up with excuses to rationalize.

Quote: "The US is killing Iraqis faster than Saddam Hussein ever did. If that constitutes life saving, I am guessing that most iraqis and most americans would rather be without."

Your right, we are killing Iraqi's...the extremist and terrorists.

Quote: "The US estimates that upwards of 250,000 people have been unlawfully killed in Iraq during the Saddam Hussein reign. NGO's estimate upwards of 500,000 dead. Apparently you decided to make up a number.
"

No, ive taken it from what ive read and seen on TV.

Quote: ">allowed for normal people to be treated humanly

-Abu-Ghraib!
-local warlords
-islamic clerics cutting off hands, lashing people and stoning them to death.
"

1) How many times do i have to say it...an isolated incident doesnt substitute for the entire war.
2) The local warlords are being tracked down and killed/captured.
3) That was before the war, that doesnt happen anymore, legally at least.

Quote: "-The US is in control of internal security.
-The IMF is in control of the fiscal and economic policy.
-The 'government' is subject to US reles made by Paul Bremmer
-Internal issues are subject to US rules by Paul Bremmer"

The US is in control, because Iraqi's cant take control, they arent strong enough yet. Same thing on economics. I dont know what your talking about with Paul Bremmer.

Quote: "The US already knew about the killings. Remember that the US helped start the iraqi WMD programme, helped Iraq in the war against Iran, and didn't mind people dieing, as long as they were communists, socialists, democrats etc. "

Where did u get that? We didnt help Iraq start a war. If we wanted a war, we would have let them invade Kuwait in the early 90's

Ill respond more later, but i g2g now.

Video games…they take you places unreachable, unfeasible. Putting you in the book...putting you in the movie...putting you in a world, that before could only be imagined. expage.com/piratesmainpage.
Jimmy
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 20th Aug 2003
Location: Back in the USA
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 03:33 Edited at: 11th Jun 2005 03:40
Ok, let's keep it on topic then.

I won't sign this petition and I'll tell you why.

Taking care of Saddam was good enough reason for me to support this war. He was a threat, you can't deny that. He was a threat to us, the surrounding nations, and his own people. From the beginning I always viewed WMDs as a good reason or excuse for congress to vote yes to invading, but in all honesty I just wanted Saddam to be captured or killed. You get Saddam and these WMDs are no longer a worry.

I believe WMDs were a diguise for the real reason for this war, which was to squelch a threat and show the rest of the world that we won't be intimidated, that we won't take no crap off of nobody. And I support that.

Osama was a threat, it's well documented, and we did nothing. So when the president is taking heat for this attack and not long after, a new threat arises, the logical thing to do is take action. Bush knew that "Pre-emptive strike" would not fly with the U.N. or Congress, so WMD evidence was either completely fabricated, or exaggerated. Either way I don't care. We got Saddam. I'm sad to see the aftermath, but I'm not surprised and with time, it will become a better place.

I think we've successfully proven to other Osama wannabes that we won't be threatened and that we aren't afraid to use force. Sure, a lot of countries hate us now, but they are afraid of us as well and that's a good thing. Don't get me wrong, I know there are better methods than bully tactics, but if it protects the American people I'm all for it.

Cellbloc Studios
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 15th Mar 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 03:35 Edited at: 11th Jun 2005 03:39
I'm sorry, do you believe anyone else could have done better with the Economy?

As for keeing on topic. What are you so upset about? So Bush led America into a War based on faulty intelligence even thou he may have "push" them into leaning that way.

So what?

[EDIT]
I'm with Jimmy. I was never one to believe that there was WMD in Iraq so I don't feel I was "lied" to. I'm not going to sign either.

-This...is my boomstick!
Jeku
Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 04:30
Quote: " Move to Canada. Canada seems to be the most neutral place around. "


No, we don't need any more liberals here--- we have enough already!

And CR -- how can you possibly compare China's leader to Saddam? Do you even know anything about China?


--[R.O.B.O.I. and FireTris Coming Soon]--
CattleRustler
Retired Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Aug 2003
Location: case modding at overclock.net
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 05:13 Edited at: 11th Jun 2005 05:13
Jimmy, I submit we have created more terrorists by our actions and Iraq and USA are not safer, they are less safe, but thats mho.

Jeku ok, when I said China is was to show the faulty logic in what others were saying that its a good idea to invade other countries when we dont agree with their leaders and treatment of their people, so I said why not invade China or North Korea? China-we'd get our asses handed to us. But the point still remains. In the context you now bring it up China isnt a good example, but North Korea still is. So what about that? Is Kim Jung Il a good guy? Does he not have internment camps? Does he not starve his people? Kill his people? Why not invade there next? Maybe after that we can go into Saudi Arabia? They kill people for infringing on islamic law etc. I say its selective for obvious reasons. Iraq couldnt defend itself against us, Saddam was a bad guy, there were WMD's that he was ready to use on us... PFFT!

Truth is, despite saddams brutality, Iraq was a secular, islamic-moderate nation, offering no real threat to its neighbors (these days, in years past he was a threat to his neighbors) There's no valid legal reason to have invaded iraq. Except of course the world's second largest oil reserve.

DBP Stuff | AirAmericaRadio.com - The Left was never so right.
Megaton Cat
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Aug 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 05:24
Quote: "What do you think Iraq would do if they were given a nuclear bomb?"


He's got a good point. I'd rather have the US pocess nuclear weapons rather then Iraq...

It's M-E-G-A-T-O-N. NOT MEGATRON.
DON'T MAKE ME GET THE RABBIT.
Jimmy
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 20th Aug 2003
Location: Back in the USA
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 05:30
Ok, the notion that we went for oil is just idiotic. If we wanted oil, we could buy it. Heck, we could have spent $200 billion and had a nice large reserve. But with how our dependency on oil is waning, with hydrogen hybrids coming out on the market and completely hydrogen operated cars available within 10 years, securing a long term oil supply by military force is moronic. Not even Bush is that stupid.

Wake up, not every action needs a negative and monetarily influenced reason. But that's a liberal for ya. Money, money, money.

Megaton Cat
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Aug 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 05:33
I miss the old Jimmy.

It's M-E-G-A-T-O-N. NOT MEGATRON.
DON'T MAKE ME GET THE RABBIT.
Cellbloc Studios
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 15th Mar 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 05:44 Edited at: 11th Jun 2005 05:47
I'm quite sure we will not invade China, North Korea. First off, there is nothing on North Korea that would benefit the USA. China, well they are FREAKING HUGE and besides, the USA gets cheap labor from them.

I don't think we just went to Iraq for the Oil, but it is a part of it. Mainly I think Bush had a grudge against Saddam for wanting to kill his father.

-This...is my boomstick!
Jeku
Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 05:45
Quote: "Is Kim Jung Il a good guy? Does he not have internment camps? Does he not starve his people? Kill his people? Why not invade there next? Maybe after that we can go into Saudi Arabia? They kill people for infringing on islamic law etc."


Who's to say the US won't go into N. Korea next? The argument of "why invade these guys when there's all these other guys that are bad too" just doesn't work because of present tense. Obviously the US can't invade every evil dictatorship in the world all at once--- one-by-one would be more like it. Because Bush and Co.(TM) are still in Iraq and Afghanistan, they would be a little slim to go into N. Korea now. Maybe later however?


--[R.O.B.O.I. and FireTris Coming Soon]--
Megaton Cat
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Aug 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 05:46
Quote: " I'm quite sure we will not invade China, well they are FREAKING HUGE"


Russia was even bigger (and colder) but Germany still invaded them...

It's M-E-G-A-T-O-N. NOT MEGATRON.
DON'T MAKE ME GET THE RABBIT.
Jeku
Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 4th Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 05:46
Quote: "Mainly I think Bush had a grudge against Saddam for wanting to kill his father."


Do you know how silly that sounds? This isn't a Hollywood movie! This isn't The Princess Bride we're talking about :-P


--[R.O.B.O.I. and FireTris Coming Soon]--
CattleRustler
Retired Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Aug 2003
Location: case modding at overclock.net
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 05:52 Edited at: 11th Jun 2005 05:58
Quote: "Obviously the US can't invade every evil dictatorship in the world all at once--- one-by-one would be more like it. Because Bush and Co.(TM) are still in Iraq and Afghanistan, they would be a little slim to go into N. Korea now. Maybe later however?"


Jeku thank you for reiterating my point exactly.

Jimmy, I drank the coolaid at first too. The way they touted all that they "knew" about wmd's, how they spoke to everyone that would listen, including the UN and the US Congress, I thought to myself "there's no way this could be bull the way they are spouting it all over like this, they must know something for sure, saddam has to have wmd's, even Bush wouldnt be this stupid to try and lie when the world would be watching..." DING! ROFLMFAO And stop with the "liberal" labelling crap, you sound like a ditto-head. You dont see me saying "hypocritical right wing facist neoconservatives" do you?

457,178 signatures by the way...

DBP Stuff | AirAmericaRadio.com - The Left was never so right.
Teh Go0rfmeister
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 17th Aug 2003
Location:
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 06:24
Gil, out of curiosity, are you the most media brainwashed person around?
Cellbloc Studios
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 15th Mar 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 06:33
@Jeku:

Yeah, it was pretty funny.

@Megaton Cat:

Then again, Germany lost not one but two World Wars....

-This...is my boomstick!
Teh Go0rfmeister
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 17th Aug 2003
Location:
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 06:41 Edited at: 11th Jun 2005 06:41
cellblock, imo it depends on how you look at it.

sure germany was the one that surrendered and admitted defeat etc, but on the other hand, as a result of the war just happening, Germany's a much more powerful nation than if it just stayed quiet. It's now got some of technologies and engineering capabilities that rival US, Britain, Switzerland and Japan.

Another point is that, as a result of the war, britain is now strong allies with the US, and now has to do everything the US want, like a war in iraq, the UK has to get involved just cos the 2 nations politicians bum each other.

germany ont he other hand has made peace with the rest of europe, and is now probably seen as a far more respectable nation than the UK by a lot of nations, not only in the EU.
Jimmy
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 20th Aug 2003
Location: Back in the USA
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 06:44
Quote: "@Megaton Cat:

Then again, Germany lost not one but two World Wars...."


I think he was making a joke. Yes, Germany invaded Russia, but they paid the price

Quote: "Jimmy, I drank the coolaid at first too. The way they touted all that they "knew" about wmd's, how they spoke to everyone that would listen, including the UN and the US Congress, I thought to myself "there's no way this could be bull the way they are spouting it all over like this, they must know something for sure, saddam has to have wmd's, even Bush wouldnt be this stupid to try and lie when the world would be watching...""


Well, if you remember, Kerry admitted that he had seen the same intelligence the president (and Collin Powell) had. So, either the WMDs are hidden VERY well or the intelligence was distorted by people in lower places.

Quote: "And stop with the "liberal" labelling crap, you sound like a ditto-head. You dont see me saying "hypocritical right wing facist neoconservatives" do you?"


What's with liberals and their fear of being called a liberal? I'm conservative and proud. If you feel that this title carries negative connotations, then maybe you should consider a change in beliefs.

Teh Go0rfmeister
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 17th Aug 2003
Location:
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 06:49
Quote: "So, either the WMDs are hidden VERY well or the intelligence was distorted by people in lower places."


or higher... but that'd be getting contraversial...
CattleRustler
Retired Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Aug 2003
Location: case modding at overclock.net
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 07:05
Quote: "If you feel that this title carries negative connotations, then maybe you should consider a change in beliefs."


Um, I don't wrap myself under labels like "liberal" or "conservative" and simply ditto their talking points. If I believe in a policy or cause it doesnt matter which side of the aisle it comes from. If you want to call me "liberal <insert adjective here>" then go right ahead. The labels people throw around are pointless. Is there anything conservative about this admin and its policies? What does "conservative" mean to you?

my only label "American" (leaning Left, thanks)

DBP Stuff | AirAmericaRadio.com - The Left was never so right.
Jimmy
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 20th Aug 2003
Location: Back in the USA
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 07:25
Quote: "And stop with the "liberal" labelling crap, you sound like a ditto-head."


Quote: "If you want to call me "liberal <insert adjective here>" then go right ahead. The labels people throw around are pointless."


Make up your mind.

Conservatism, to me, means taking a common sense and moral approach to politics. I'm a pro-war, pro-life, pro-waffle, uninformed hick and I couldn't be happier.

CattleRustler
Retired Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Aug 2003
Location: case modding at overclock.net
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 07:42 Edited at: 11th Jun 2005 08:10
Quote: "Make up your mind."

I said to stop, but if youre not going to stop, then oh well, go right ahead.

Quote: "I'm a pro-war, pro-life, pro-waffle, uninformed hick and I couldn't be happier."


At least you admit your ignorance is your bliss, I'll give you that.


On a more intelligent note:

James Sensenbrenner lost his mind this morning, and interupted a Democratic Hearing in the House regarding Guantanamo Bay Detainees, with sworn testimony from witnesses who were prior detainees at gitmo. He burst in, tried to end the hearing, would not yield the floor, would not observe Point Of Order request (to take vote on whether or not to stop the hearing), ordered reporter to stop typing the minutes, then ordered CSPAN microphones turned off! What do the "common sense and moral" majority have to hide regarding gitmo? It wasnt until the democrats invoked rule 11 of the House, was the hearing, which was completely legal and within House rules, allowed to continue.

Not sure if this is re-airing on CSPAN but is unprecedented and quite telling.

Oh and its coming live in real-time from CSPAN, not the twisted corporate media in this country, no one's spin blah blah (I just listened to an audio replay of Sensenbrenners madness). I doubt this will be shown on the news tonight. The news has been cancelled.

DBP Stuff | AirAmericaRadio.com - The Left has never been so right | The news has been cancelled!
Cellbloc Studios
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 15th Mar 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 07:46 Edited at: 11th Jun 2005 07:48
Maybe the Alien Mother ship that Iraq was secretly building and flown by the three men that shot Kennedy powered by the Nixon tapes made its way back to Roswell, NM and he didn't want to alarm people?

-This...is my boomstick!
CattleRustler
Retired Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Aug 2003
Location: case modding at overclock.net
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 07:51 Edited at: 11th Jun 2005 07:53
Cellbloc, do you imply im talking up some "conspiracy theory"? Do you know what cspan is? Its LIVE cameras and audio of the United States Congress (both the house and the senate).

DBP Stuff | AirAmericaRadio.com - The Left has never been so right | The news has been cancelled!
Cellbloc Studios
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 15th Mar 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 07:54 Edited at: 11th Jun 2005 08:01
Nope sorry, never heard of it. Too busy watching reruns of Mister Ed.

Could it be that this guy, James Sensenbrenner or whatever his name was, didn't want Congress talking about the Gitmo Execution Prison in Cuba? That would be my first guess.

Haha. Mister Ed kicked the door and hit Wilbur in the head!!! Haha.

Eitehr way, so what? I don't see what all this has to do with the topic. Best of luck on getting it signed, always gotta root for the underdogs!

-This...is my boomstick!
CattleRustler
Retired Moderator
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Aug 2003
Location: case modding at overclock.net
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 07:56
right, ok.
figured as much.

please post on topic, or somewhere within the realm, thanks




DBP Stuff | AirAmericaRadio.com - The Left has never been so right | The news has been cancelled!
Mattman
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Jun 2003
Location: East Lansing
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 08:02
I watched C-Span once! It's the best way to fall asleep fast !

My less-pimp name was Mattman.
Jimmy
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 20th Aug 2003
Location: Back in the USA
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 08:05
I used "uninformed" in the sense that I don't need to be told what I believe. I don't need to have my diaper wiped by cspan or CNN or the local newspaper. I don't give a crap about what's going on in congress, because nothing comes of it. Go ahead, have your hearings, sign your petitions, gather up all the evidence you can against Bush and his administration, and go on avoiding the real issues. Maybe if they were meeting to actually do something about social security, immigration or the gas/oil crisis, I'd give a rat. But while the democraps are hollering, "Bush is bad! See look at this prisoner, he's so sad. BAD BUSH BAD!" I'm going to divert my attention elsewhere.

The men at that hearing are a bunch of stinking hippies. They dreamed of days like these from the time they were in a road-side tent smoking doobies, creating "love children," and doing nothing but whining about the vietnam war and the government.

Gil Galvanti
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 22nd Dec 2004
Location: Texas, United States
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 08:06
So "C-Span" is live video of the house and senate? Never heard of it. Its a channel? Ive never seen that. (Not saying i dont believe you saying i just didnt know it exsisted ).

Video games…they take you places unreachable, unfeasible. Putting you in the book...putting you in the movie...putting you in a world, that before could only be imagined. expage.com/piratesmainpage.
Gil Galvanti
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 22nd Dec 2004
Location: Texas, United States
Posted: 11th Jun 2005 08:08
Quote: "But while the democraps are hollering, "Bush is bad! See look at this prisoner, he's so sad. BAD BUSH BAD!" I'm going to divert my attention elsewhere.
"

Good point, do you really think that Bush is gonna resign because of protest from the opposing party? You might as well accept it and make the best of it, and concentrate on other things than just continually searching for ways to say hes bad .

Video games…they take you places unreachable, unfeasible. Putting you in the book...putting you in the movie...putting you in a world, that before could only be imagined. expage.com/piratesmainpage.

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2024-11-27 19:38:04
Your offset time is: 2024-11-27 19:38:04