Quote: "...it's like you took what seemed (to me) like a straightforward thread ridiculing government, skewed point, exaggerated it, and THEN argued against it. Almost every statement of that paragraph was a tautology, arranged so that it almost appears like a valid argument. >.>"
That's my job
But in all seriousness, that's how I felt about the original article. So Pizza's now a vegetable because it has a label...? Of course it's not, let's get some perspective here.
What I'm saying here is that the original article is greatly exaggerating the problem - if you actually read what I wrote, you'll notice I'm saying these things
won't happen. Mountains out of mole hills.
And...I only wanted to make a quick joke
(well, long joke)
Quote: "Because the government illogically changing the labelling of something, to the detriment of the consumer, just for the benefit of businesses is wrong? Hello?"
Except, as I already said, a) I don't understand how this is to the detriment of the consumer when all it takes is some
thought, and also I don't see how it's a
big issue. It's not. It's a silly issue.
