Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

DarkBASIC Professional Discussion / relief mapping in quake 4

Author
Message
Simian
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 16th Feb 2004
Location: my room
Posted: 22nd Dec 2005 16:17
Link
not really darkbasic related, but shader related.
check out what this guy is up to http://fabio.policarpo.nom.br/relief/index.htm

couple of nice documents and demo movies that show off relief mapping, plus, he created a tool for quake4 and doom3 makes the game art reliefmapping friendly. demo videos of this included too.

since i saw raven say something about relief mapping in the ultimate shader thread 2, i thought this might be relavant.
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Van B
Moderator
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Oct 2002
Location: Sunnyvale
Posted: 22nd Dec 2005 16:24
Link
Is that like Parallax Mapping? - I've seen results like that from some of the shaders in the ultimate shader thread, Ninja Matt maybe?

Looks cool anyways, and maybe DBPro can do it already through a shader.


Van-B

Put away, those fiery biscuits!
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Simian
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 16th Feb 2004
Location: my room
Posted: 22nd Dec 2005 16:34
Link
from the shader thread - page 5



we can see from the picture that paralax mapping is better than normal mapping, but relief mapping blows both of them out of the water!!

the shader is able to make the surface render outside the confines of the actual mesh. With a normalmapped or paralaxmapped sphere for example, we used to see detail inside the sillouette of the sphere, with the edges still being as angular as the original mesh. Relief mapping solves that completely by pushing the detail out.
Beautifull.

here is a cool video demonstrating exactly that:
http://fabio.policarpo.nom.br/videos/Curved_ReliefMapping_Video.zip
Back to top
Profile PM Email
NeX the Fairly Fast Ferret
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 10th Apr 2005
Location: The Fifth Plane of Oblivion
Posted: 22nd Dec 2005 17:14
Link
Imagine if this became a hardware rendered graphics card FX...

That on every polygon with no FPS drop...



Back to top
Profile PM Website
Hamish McHaggis
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 13th Dec 2002
Location: Modgnik Detinu
Posted: 22nd Dec 2005 17:22
Link
Quote: "Imagine if this became a hardware rendered graphics card FX..."


Umm, isn't that the idea? It has already been implimented in Doom 3 and Quake 4.

Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
blanky
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Aug 2004
Location: ./
Posted: 22nd Dec 2005 17:28 Edited at: 22nd Dec 2005 17:30
Link
Normal mapping is designed for faking extra polygons, not making radical changes to the object's geometry. The reason relief mapping looks better there is because it's not just bumps you're after, it's massive pointy bits.

16-colour PNGs pwn.
Back to top
Profile PM Email Website
Ian T
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 12th Sep 2002
Location: Around
Posted: 22nd Dec 2005 21:10
Link
Relief mapping is very pretty and very GPU-intensive. I think it would be possible in DBP if you ported the shader over properly, but don't expect to be able to apply it to much unless you have a monster of a machine


Arr
Back to top
Profile PM
Simian
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 16th Feb 2004
Location: my room
Posted: 23rd Dec 2005 17:28
Link
maybe oneday there'll be a shader that can render a complete detailed quake4 style level using only one polygon (and an EMENSE amount of maps)

the ultimate shader challenge!! (nix for doing it by the way)

Back to top
Profile PM Email
Kangaroo2 BETA2
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 23rd Aug 2003
Location: Somerset / UK
Posted: 23rd Dec 2005 17:47
Link
that looks really cool But wouldn't it be such a hit on most people's graphics cards that just actually adding the extra polys would be more efficient on all but the very highest end cards?


Preorder EA here:http://forum.thegamecreators.com/?m=forum_view&t=67575&b=8&p=0
+ Model Pro out now in Program Announcements!
Back to top
Profile PM Email
Ian T
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 12th Sep 2002
Location: Around
Posted: 24th Dec 2005 22:28
Link
Quote: "But wouldn't it be such a hit on most people's graphics cards that just actually adding the extra polys would be more efficient on all but the very highest end cards?"


Not on the high end, PS 3.0 cards, especially when you consider polygon density. A 512x512 normal map can add a whole lot of little details with relief mapping, thousands of polys' worth I would imagine. On lower end cards though, such as my Geforce FX 5200, even that demo is incredibly slow.


Arr
Back to top
Profile PM
Back to top

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2024-11-24 10:33:04
Your offset time is: 2024-11-24 10:33:04