Quote: "If you can do better then please do so and help the communtiy[sic] out and maybe make a few bucks in the process. If not then your[sic] just making your self look silly."
What does me giving C&C to a project have to do with my skills? Isn't it a bit of an old argument to dismiss someone's comments just because they cannot or will not make anything to the same caliber? In other words I have no intention of making a competitor to PGP but that does not mean I cannot give comments to it, and it certainly does not make me look silly.
Quote: "If you have a valid point then don't just say it, prove it. Hack the current version of PGPS and send proof of this to DarkFact. He can then improve the program. If there is something that you have to contribute then I'm willing to listen. If all your[sic] going to do is talk down the work of others then my ears hear you but your[sic] an annoyance more than anything."
Prove what? most of my points had nothing to do with the protection, in each case when I gained access to the files I posted proof, what more do you need? Perhaps you may see my comments as talking down to a project but they are just honest feedback you can go ahead and tell everyone your sugar coated responses, I like to get to the point.
Quote: "If you could list the ways to make PGPS better, what would they be?"
You're their PR rep now? As said before the protection could be better, Benjamin suggested a much more effective method of media protection in the other thread, the amount of times I've accessed the files alone should be a wake up call to take the issue more seriously as the product is called 'Game Protection' after all, if it can't protect very well then you're only inconveniencing users rather than safeguarding their work.
Quote: "I will tell you what you will do next. You will make another ettempt[sic] to make me look bad. After that the subject will die. It will die because I chose to let it. I could keep you going forever if I wanted. You can't help yourself. It's a fever inside you to get the last word. Your[sic] predictable."
FYI I only replied again because you mentioned me in three posts, I was actually willing to let the issue drop. Another attempt to make you look bad? Well that isn't very hard as all I did was point out a few issues that I saw and you seemed to take what I said very personally and incessantly posting defending my claims. If anything it's you who is baiting me into replying as you first call me a punk albeit rather subtly and after you noticed I didn't reply you mentioned me by name apparently replying to someone's post on the previous page which you had obviously seen beforehand so really, who is the one who has a fever inside of them?
