Pincho, from one of your other threads.
Quote: "Good. I don't know much about the scientific method. I have that test. And it shows us new physics that are in our environment."
I would suggest learning the scientific method and understand what is needed before something is considered to be 'true'. And no, it's not about the current model of physics, it's about how much evidence and data you need on your side. A single test or simulation isn't enough for it to be considered proven.
What you understand to be enough 'proof' may be completely and utterly different to what science will accept as enough proof, you might be a lot less fussy. The scientific method tries to be thorough before trying to make absolute claims. An example would be the Higgs Boson, even though they found what they were looking for, it's by no means the end of their experimentation, they're still a long way from coming to their ultimate conclusion.
Your method so far as been:
Observation -> Hypothesis -> Claim hypothesis to be true -> Refer to hypothesis as theory -> Do a single test and claim it proves your hypothesis -> Attempt peer review
The scientific method:
Observation -> Hypothesis -> Test Hypothesis -> If test supports hypothesis, do another test || If test doesn't support hypothesis, adjust hypothesis and do another test. Repeat over and over, one test is not enough. Once you have substantial results, then publish in peer reviewed journal and accept it as a theory -> Then continue to do more tests.
Until it can be considered a theory by the scientific community it isn't considered factual. This is how I understand the scientific method. At no point does the standard model of physics need to be included (like you previously suggested).
You may try to publish your current results as you are THAT confident they prove something. I suspect you'll find that they'll be turned down and they might even suggest you don't understand the scientific method. It would be a shame if it suddently turned out what you're saying is accurate. So my suggestion? Get the scientifc method right. Get your research, talk to the scientific community and build bridges so you can get the best possible results out of your tests and build a solid thesis.
Alternatively, you can arrogantly state that you're right and that scientists are all wrong and get nowhere with it.
