Sorry your browser is not supported!

You are using an outdated browser that does not support modern web technologies, in order to use this site please update to a new browser.

Browsers supported include Chrome, FireFox, Safari, Opera, Internet Explorer 10+ or Microsoft Edge.

Geek Culture / 19 year old kid locked up in jail for sarcastic joke.

Author
Message
Seppuku Arts
Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Aug 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posted: 14th Jul 2013 16:13
Quote: "cats really are picky lol..."


I dunno, my cat Yoshi will eat anything, mash potato, curry, even asparagus. In fact, I've caught her eating concrete.

Benjamin
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Nov 2002
Location: France
Posted: 14th Jul 2013 16:16
Quote: "I dunno, my cat Yoshi will eat anything, mash potato"


I've tried getting mine to mash it but they can't get their little paws around the masher.

"Sideboobs are awesome. Getting punched in the face is not." - Jerico2Day on violence and nudity
Seppuku Arts
Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Aug 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posted: 14th Jul 2013 16:18
Shame, because it's a neat trick.

xplosys
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Jan 2006
Playing: FPSC Multiplayer Games
Posted: 14th Jul 2013 16:40
I can't decide if my cat is really smart or really dumb. She won't eat anything but dry cat food. No milk, cheese, fish.... nothing. The only other thing she shows any interest in is roast turkey, but we don't have that often. Maybe she knows something we don't.

Brian.

I am the underground.
Green Gandalf
VIP Member
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jan 2005
Playing: Malevolence:Sword of Ahkranox, Skyrim, Civ6.
Posted: 14th Jul 2013 16:58
Quote: "Maybe she knows something we don't."


Probably.

One of our cats knows where to find fresh young rabbits - if he doesn't like the food we give him he wanders off and returns with one.
KeithC
Senior Moderator
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 27th Oct 2005
Location: Michigan
Posted: 14th Jul 2013 16:59 Edited at: 14th Jul 2013 17:00
For those following the whole Martin/Zimmerman case; an interesting and informative video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bF-Ax5E8EJc

Also; losing a pet is quite sad. Lost a few in my time; always like losing a close friend or family member.

-Keith

xplosys
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Jan 2006
Playing: FPSC Multiplayer Games
Posted: 14th Jul 2013 17:55
Quote: "One of our cats knows where to find fresh young rabbits"


Always looking for fresh young bunnies myself. Any chance the cat will share?

I am the underground.
Green Gandalf
VIP Member
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jan 2005
Playing: Malevolence:Sword of Ahkranox, Skyrim, Civ6.
Posted: 14th Jul 2013 22:54
Believe me I've tried - and have the scars to prove it.

Fresh young bunnies have sharp claws you know ...
Matty H
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 7th Oct 2008
Location: England
Posted: 14th Jul 2013 23:15
Quote: "For those following the whole Martin/Zimmerman case; an interesting and informative video:"


I watched about 10 minutes around the middle, seems it's a pro Zimmerman video to me? I don't know anything about this case but there seems to be some questionable points in this video. Things like street names changing, I would need more info on that, sounds odd. Witnesses being related to Zimmerman? Is that what the video said? If so then again, questionable. Shooting toward Martin, not at him, odd thing to say, it's like the guy in the video thinks he was there?

I have no opinion on what happened, I'm just not convinced by that guy in the video.

I would have watched more but I need to put the kids to bed

TheComet
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Oct 2007
Location: I`m under ur bridge eating ur goatz.
Posted: 15th Jul 2013 00:14
KeithC
Senior Moderator
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 27th Oct 2005
Location: Michigan
Posted: 15th Jul 2013 07:04
Yep just put it up for general interest, as there seems to be a flood going the other way in the news. Just hoping that the protests are in court, and the violence is minimal. That's not going to solve anything.

-Keith

bitJericho
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 9th Oct 2002
Location: United States
Posted: 15th Jul 2013 07:34 Edited at: 15th Jul 2013 07:35
That was a really interesting perspective on things.

I think it's better to err on the side of caution. You don't want to lock up an innocent man.

Visit my blog http://www.canales.me.
rolfy
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 23rd Jun 2006
Location:
Posted: 15th Jul 2013 19:21 Edited at: 15th Jul 2013 19:27
Looks like they might still have a case for a civil lawsuit, which is more likely if he goes for the inevitable film and book deals, if he has any sense he wont, would be incredibly insensitive.

Quote: "My cat is dead"

That might actually have been funny if you had said 'My pony is dead'
Benjamin
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Nov 2002
Location: France
Posted: 15th Jul 2013 19:28
Sooo what do you guys think about the whole Bradley Manning thing? And you do think it's worth risking the lives of soldiers in order to ensure that nothing is kept secret from the public? And is keeping secrets from the public not sometimes a good thing?

"Sideboobs are awesome. Getting punched in the face is not." - Jerico2Day on violence and nudity
KeithC
Senior Moderator
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 27th Oct 2005
Location: Michigan
Posted: 15th Jul 2013 20:03
That's one of those grey areas Benjamin. I obviously don't think risking the lives of our military is an option; though it may be an easy decision for someone who isn't in the Military. I think keeping secrets from the public to prevent mass hysteria, for example, is needed at times. But that's a large question that deserves it's own area to discuss (not sure about it here; but we could always lock it later).

-Keith

rolfy
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 23rd Jun 2006
Location:
Posted: 15th Jul 2013 20:24
To me it's really simple, if it risks lives...then simply no.
If you sign up for the military I think you are instantly under some kind of official secrets act, for good reason.
Technically and morally its wrong.
Indicium
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 26th May 2008
Location:
Posted: 15th Jul 2013 20:29
Quote: "To me it's really simple, if it risks lives...then simply no."


Not everything is that simple, unfortunately.


They see me coding, they hating. http://indi-indicium.blogspot.co.uk/
Benjamin
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Nov 2002
Location: France
Posted: 15th Jul 2013 21:05 Edited at: 15th Jul 2013 21:05
In a way I agree what what you two are saying. It seems ridiculous that those that are constantly risking their lives to protect their country have additional dangers caused by their fellow citizens. But what about those people that have undergone injustices, that this person is trying to expose?

I agree that certain things could be hidden from the public to prevent mass hysteria, but where do these secrets end? It's all too easy to cover up injustices under the false pretense that it is to protect the public.

"Sideboobs are awesome. Getting punched in the face is not." - Jerico2Day on violence and nudity
rolfy
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 23rd Jun 2006
Location:
Posted: 15th Jul 2013 21:47 Edited at: 15th Jul 2013 22:10
Quote: "It's all too easy to cover up injustices under the false pretense that it is to protect the public."
I suppose that's the question right there, who decides if its in the public interest?
Certainly the media are not the best judge of such things with their 'need for a delicious story' rather than public interest at heart.
This kind of question is hard to answer and obviously depends on how much information should be made available, of course it's open to abuse, but what's the options?

I guess this is why they have internal investigators but who's to say they can be trusted to do the right thing?

"Loose lips sink ships".

Quote: "But what about those people that have undergone injustices, that this person is trying to expose?"
This can be a matter of personal perspective when someone is simply disgruntled or disagree with internal judgement. I still dont think risking lives for personal reasons is right.
"The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few" as Spock would tell you.
Still, it can be used to shut someone up but I still cant accept it means it's ok to risk others lives, even for the sake of one mans justice.It's not as if his life was on the line when he handed it all to Wikileaks. Two wrongs don't make a right.

Did he really need to expose so much to get his point across?
Matty H
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 7th Oct 2008
Location: England
Posted: 15th Jul 2013 22:40
I think the public deserve to know exactly what the government and military are doing in our name with our money.

Secrets should be the exception to the rule and only used in extreme circumstances. This is all my own opinion of course and the kind of country I would wish to live in, even I just allowed for secrets in extreme circumstances so who decides what is extreme?

The most memorable thing from the leaks was the massacre of those photographers and kids in Iraq. We don't get told these things so we support wars with incomplete information, this is why I will never support another war again, unless there is a standing army waiting to invade the UK.

So I thank Manning for his courage and sacrifice, although I realise it is far from black and white.

First things first would be to stop selling the weapons to these countries in the first place, then we would not be in the position of having a hand in conflicts in Syria, Libya etc sometimes funding both sides of a war for profit.

Libervurto
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Jun 2006
Location: On Toast
Posted: 15th Jul 2013 22:58
Quote: "I think keeping secrets from the public to prevent mass hysteria, for example, is needed at times."

Ignorance is strength.
xplosys
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Jan 2006
Playing: FPSC Multiplayer Games
Posted: 16th Jul 2013 00:17
Quote: "Ignorance is strength."


Had to think about that for a moment, but in the proper context it makes perfect sense.

I am the underground.
Wolf
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Nov 2007
Location: Luxemburg
Posted: 16th Jul 2013 01:49
Quote: "Had to think about that for a moment, but in the proper context it makes perfect sense. "


Thats actually a quote from Orvell's 1984. Part of the motto of a controlled society.

http://www.serygalacaffeine.com
Without struggle,no progress and no result.Every breaking of habit produces a change in the machine.
Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 16th Jul 2013 03:32
Quote: "To me it's really simple, if it risks lives...then simply no.
"



that pretty much - and a hefty "Period" on that.

kind of like this one if it were staying still



Whose eyes are those eyes?
KeithC
Senior Moderator
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 27th Oct 2005
Location: Michigan
Posted: 16th Jul 2013 05:46
Quote: "I think the public deserve to know exactly what the government and military are doing in our name with our money."


I would agree more with the government, then with the military. The public, generally, has no idea what circumstances are; therefore they do not need to know. Armchair quarterbacking should be a felony offense, in my opinion.

-Keith

mr Handy
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 7th Sep 2007
Location: out of TGC
Posted: 16th Jul 2013 09:00
Quote: "He has now been in jail for about 5-6 months and apparently is still awaiting trial."


God bless USA, the most democratic union of all times.



«Just because you’re unique, doesn’t mean you’re useful»
«If you contributed to the reason for locking, you may now find yourself on moderation, or in extreme cases in the grave»
Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 16th Jul 2013 10:52
Quote: "I would agree more with the government, then with the military. The public, generally, has no idea what circumstances are; therefore they do not need to know."


to me, half the point of voting is so we know what the government is doing with ze money.. (not that we swedes get to know but that doesnt mean I like it)



Whose eyes are those eyes?
Matty H
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 7th Oct 2008
Location: England
Posted: 16th Jul 2013 11:45
Quote: "The public, generally, has no idea what circumstances are; therefore they do not need to know. Armchair quarterbacking should be a felony offense, in my opinion."


So the pubic should never know what our military is up to at any time? That's a slippery slope if you ask me, just think what would be possible without pubic knowledge or even just having a misinformed public.

"Armchair quarterbacking", I like that saying, I'm just a civilian and should stay out of it I guess?

Libervurto
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Jun 2006
Location: On Toast
Posted: 16th Jul 2013 11:53
Probably an ideal time to slip this in... I have thought for a while that instead of having age limits there should be an aptitude test that can be taken at any age, but compulsory at 16. Test would assess your ability to make rational and responsible decisions. Everything from smoking to voting rights could be earned at any age.

Some people might never earn the right to vote. Is this a really evil idea or what?
Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 16th Jul 2013 11:56
Quote: "Probably an ideal time to slip this in... I have thought for a while that instead of having age limits there should be an aptitude test that can be taken at any age, but compulsory at 16. Test would assess your ability to make rational and responsible decisions. Everything from smoking to voting rights could be earned at any age."



Ergh.



Whose eyes are those eyes?
Wolf
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Nov 2007
Location: Luxemburg
Posted: 16th Jul 2013 14:42 Edited at: 16th Jul 2013 14:54
Quote: "Is this a really evil idea or what? "


You should be grown out of ideas like this I had these kinds of thoughts when I was in my early teens, learning about the government and politics around me No offense of course!

The essential issue is that a government will test individuals if they are fit to be voting for a government. Yeah, I dont see how that could go wrong.

Also the idea of a select few and a predetermined selection process judging over who is a functional human being and who is not is awful.
Everyone who can exist in society without endangering others or medical conditions has a right to vote and do whatever every other person does. Wether you agree with their point of views or not.
Thats democracy. Chosing people to vote upon whatever test is not.



-Wolf

Quote: "So the pubic should never know what our military is up to at any time?"


Come on guys! Be real here, the public doesnt know what the military is up to. period.

Some things get published, others dont,others might shatter your sanity if you knew about it. Same goes for law enforcment. The police does their best so that some extraordinary gruesome cases dont make it in the newspapers and I live in a country small enough to witness things that never make it to the news and I may or may not have a friend who listens to the police radio...but I digress!

Its the military, not the boyscouts. "Top Secret" and "Eyes only" files haven't been invented for the movies. I can take a lot and wouldnt want to know everything that is going on in military organisations...I know a lot of people way more squeamish and fragile than me and they might not be able to handle some of the more dark things that happen around us.

The government does also have a responsability for the mental health of their citizens so a branch of your military might just have defused a chemical weapon seconds before launch and your police might just be after a guy who makes necklaces out of dead children but you dont need to be flooded with this information.

I dont agree with this but see how you can defend it.

http://www.serygalacaffeine.com
Without struggle,no progress and no result.Every breaking of habit produces a change in the machine.
Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 16th Jul 2013 15:03
Quote: "Come on guys! Be real here, the public doesnt know what the military is up to. period."


Would be nice to know what I am voting for, wouldn't it?



Whose eyes are those eyes?
Seppuku Arts
Moderator
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Aug 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posted: 16th Jul 2013 15:18 Edited at: 16th Jul 2013 15:19
Quote: "Some people might never earn the right to vote. Is this a really evil idea or what?"


I think this would be open to more corruption. The reason people are allowed to vote is so they can have their say in how society works. A person may completely misunderstand, but there are issues people do understand, things people feel are important and where their vote could make the difference.

Of course when it comes to an aptitude test, who decideds what's in it? Who governs them? This system is on that can be corrupted should somebody wish to twist the test in their favour. If the questions/answers were consistent, then wouldn't it be easy to cheat? All you'd need to do is Google "General Aptitude Test Answers" and boom, sorted! So people would need to govern the content.

I can understand the desire to stop people who don't know what they're talking about and base their opinions of what a guy's friend once said or people who fool for corruption or fool for clever propaganda, but I don't see this as the solution.

Rather than block out the 'stupid people' (so to speak), I think we should be educating them, perhaps more at a school level and of course have well skilled journalists out there not in favour of a particular political party who are skilled enough to call politicians out on their rubbish and demonstrate their weaknesses. There was a time when journalists were like that, sure we've got Paxman here in the UK, but I think most journalists are pretty poor and those that do try to challenge a politician generally are unfair to the ones they don't like and nice to the ones they do.

I think people would be less dumb about their choices if a journalist were capable showing people for who they really are and what they stand for. Obviously there's ways around this, but it'd make me feel a lot better about who I vote for and who other people are voting for.

Wolf
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 8th Nov 2007
Location: Luxemburg
Posted: 16th Jul 2013 16:42 Edited at: 16th Jul 2013 16:44
Quote: "Would be nice to know what I am voting for, wouldn't it?
"


Yes! Personally, I believe the entire voting thing is nothing but a carrot-on-a-stick routine.

Regardless of what I think: what the army is up to is that big of an argument in elections anyway. Unless there is a war or larger conflict going on anyway. In my surrounding nations, its always been about jobs, infrastructure...that sort of thing.

http://www.serygalacaffeine.com
Without struggle,no progress and no result.Every breaking of habit produces a change in the machine.
Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 16th Jul 2013 16:47
That's indeed quite right - but it would be nice to know - is all I am saying. Especially considerng I am a very moral hefty guy



Whose eyes are those eyes?
KeithC
Senior Moderator
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 27th Oct 2005
Location: Michigan
Posted: 16th Jul 2013 16:59
Quote: "to me, half the point of voting is so we know what the government is doing with ze money.. "

You kind of quoted me out of context there. I'm saying, I would agree more with knowing what the government is up to, more so than the military.

Posting what the military is doing at all angles would give the enemy the edge they need. But I suppose that's alright with some people (those people not actually being in harm's way). It's easy to say, when you've never served...and never plan on serving.

There was an incident, early on in the War. 2 journalists were embedded with a military unit, in the push to repel one of Saddam's "armored forces". The journalists decided on their own to push ahead of the U.S. element. When they realized they were heading right into the enemy's lines; they tried to turn around and head back. That is when the U.S. opened up on the enemy lines. One of the journalists was killed. They whined and cried about it. But, what they didn't publish; was at that point, they were basically blended in with the enemy's "armored vehicles". The enemy's armor consisted of whatever they could mount a gun to at the time....which included civilian vehicles. Point here being; if you're going to insist on sticking your nose where it doesn't belong, be prepared for something to go wrong.

Another incident happened a few years into the War. A U.S. element was clearing a building that they had received fire from (another supposedly friendly area). Inside they found the dead bodies of numerous enemy; though one was still alive. One of the soldiers shot and killed him. This was filmed by an embedded reporter; who later published it. Then the arm-chair quarterbacking ensued, and sought to condemn the soldier...without know the true facts.

Those guys had just tried to kill everyone in that element. The guy who shot and killed the wounded man had just received a wound to the face moments before. His buddy came across a similar situation a few days prior...wounded enemy groaning and acting wounded. When his buddy got close to check on the wounded man, he was greeted with a live hand grenade...his buddy died there. These men (and women) have mere split seconds to make a decision, in an ALWAYS tense environment. Arm-chair quarterbacks will take hours, if not days picking something apart. I would suggest, if you could do better; sign up and hit the front lines. At the very least; talk to the soldier face to face, and see if you have the balls to criticize his actions.

So yes; there are some things that the military can inform the public about. But most of the time; it's none of your (or my) business. As far as the taxpayer argument goes; you can trade in your duty to pay taxes, with time in service. If it wasn't for the guys and gals of the service; volunteering, you'd be conscripted.

Quote: "Would be nice to know what I am voting for, wouldn't it?"


You don't vote for the military; you vote for the politician that uses the military.

I like the idea of either a test to be able to vote (too many idiots voting these days, most of them have no idea (literally) on what they're voting for), or military/civil service performed. Too many people these days like to talk about their "rights" that they have done nothing (other than to be born here) to earn. It'll never happen, but it'd be nice.

I also agree with Wolf's points, and Sep has some great points as well.

-Keith

Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 16th Jul 2013 17:05
Quote: "Posting what the military is doing at all angles would give the enemy the edge they need. But I suppose that's alright with some people (those people not actually being in harm's way). It's easy to say, when you've never served...and never plan on serving."


That is absolutly a fair point - and I absolutly agree with it, I do think many of my moral - and other opinions are based off the fact that I have.. lived a quiet life so to say - and thus, my morals are "skewed", but still very strong

for example:
Quote: "You don't vote for the military; you vote for the politician that uses the military."


I would vote for the politician that doesn't use the military, unless it's directly necessary to secure the future of our country.

Quote: "I like the idea of either a test to be able to vote (too many idiots voting these days, most of them have no idea (literally) on what they're voting for), or military/civil service performed. Too many people these days like to talk about their "rights" that they have done nothing (other than to be born here) to earn. It'll never happen, but it'd be nice."


I quite despise that idea though, sure - i am not very keen on "Sverigedemokraterna" rising in votes (could be seen as a racist party) - but that doesnt mean that I would like to strip their votes away either, that would very much defeat the whole purpose of the system



Whose eyes are those eyes?
KeithC
Senior Moderator
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 27th Oct 2005
Location: Michigan
Posted: 16th Jul 2013 17:15
Quote: "I do think many of my moral - and other opinions are based off the fact that I have.. lived a quiet life so to say - and thus, my morals are "skewed", but still very strong"


That quiet life has (at some point in your history) been bought and paid for by another man's actions, and quite possibly their life. There isn't a country in the World that was established by simply showing up, building a civilization and living completely peacefully. Whether it was a few hundred years ago, or a thousand; your quiet life was paid for with another man's blood.

Quote: "I would vote for the politician that doesn't use the military, unless it's directly necessary to secure the future of our country."


And how exactly would you know whether they would or won't? By their "record"...by what they "say". Please tell me how you would know with certainty that the candidate you are voting for, would do as you'd wish. I realize that no candidate has ever gone back on their word, but still....

-Keith

Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 16th Jul 2013 17:18
Quote: "That quiet life has (at some point in your history) been bought and paid for by another man's actions, and quite possibly their life. There isn't a country in the World that was established by simply showing up, building a civilization and living completely peacefully. Whether it was a few hundred years ago, or a thousand; your quiet life was paid for with another man's blood."


That's very much true - to some extent.

Quote: "And how exactly would you know whether they would or won't? By their "record"...by what they "say". Please tell me how you would know with certainty that the candidate you are voting for, would do as you'd wish. I realize that no candidate has ever gone back on their word, but still...."


oh many have, I am not that naive ~~
To be fair - i do not know, and I do not like that we are left so much in the dark about it so that I cannot think of a way to know. Heck - we dont even write about when swedish soldiers die in other countries - unless it's a really big number.



Whose eyes are those eyes?
Matty H
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 7th Oct 2008
Location: England
Posted: 16th Jul 2013 18:06 Edited at: 16th Jul 2013 18:46
My point is that if the public had the slightest idea what situations we put our armed forces in, along with the massive amount of collateral damage which occurs then the soldiers would be less likely to be there in the first place.


edit:spelling

Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 16th Jul 2013 18:07
Quote: "My point is that if the public had the slightest idea what situations we put are armed forces in, along with the massive amount of collateral damage which occurs then the soldiers would be less likely to be there in the first place."


This ^ Pretty much



Whose eyes are those eyes?
Green Gandalf
VIP Member
20
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jan 2005
Playing: Malevolence:Sword of Ahkranox, Skyrim, Civ6.
Posted: 16th Jul 2013 18:25
Quote: "My point is that if the public had the slightest idea what situations we put are armed forces in, along with the massive amount of collateral damage which occurs then the soldiers would be less likely to be there in the first place"


That's fine if everybody plays by the same rules - but they don't.
Libervurto
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 30th Jun 2006
Location: On Toast
Posted: 17th Jul 2013 00:21 Edited at: 17th Jul 2013 00:26
Quote: "Also the idea of a select few and a predetermined selection process judging over who is a functional human being and who is not is awful.
Everyone who can exist in society without endangering others or medical conditions has a right to vote and do whatever every other person does. Whether you agree with their point of views or not.
That's democracy."

Isn't it the same now but without giving people a chance to prove themselves? If you are below an arbitrary age you cannot vote; if a doctor declares you insane then you cannot vote.

This idea has been rattling around in my head for years because I can't think of an ethical way that it could be implemented, but in principle I think it would be beneficial. People only care about their rights when they are denied them; and if it's done subtly or by tempting them with some convenience they often still don't care.

I am liberal-minded but I agree with the conservative notion that people take for granted that which is given to them without incurring some personal expense (money or work). But that doesn't mean people should not be aided, they just need to have a stake in it themselves, even a small percentage. I have personal experience of this: when I was on a bookkeeping course, I paid for the first term but managed to get financial support for the second (the council paid the entire fee), I have to be honest and admit my work ethic plummeted once I was no longer paying for the course. I think access to education is extremely important, most important, but I should have had some stake in the course, I should have had something to lose if I failed, even if it was just 5% of the fee.

The "citizenship" test would have the same effect, people would have to earn their right to vote, and so they would value it, instead of it being handed to them freely. Having to study and pass a test is a lot easier than staging a revolution, but hopefully it would have the same effect of awakening them to the value of their rights. But how to make it ethical?... Maybe the top 50% of people pass every year? That way, no matter how the test is altered the percentage of people gaining higher rights remains the same. Of course there are still issues with corruption, i.e. I heard that in the past black students would often have their grades artificially lowered to make them appear less intelligent than they were.

You have to pass a test to drive a vehicle, so why not have the same for voting? Do we only care about short-term consequences of poor judgement?
Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 17th Jul 2013 00:39
Quote: "Isn't it the same now but without giving people a chance to prove themselves? If you are below an arbitrary age you cannot vote; if a doctor declares you insane then you cannot vote."


Not a big fan of that either no, except.. Age - because if you are 18 you have - hopefully for example gone through school, and in that case you should have gotten atleast a brief introduction to politics
Saying to a 5 year old "lets vote!!" is.. silly - because the child is likely to vote for whatever i'll vote for - or the politician with the nicest color.

Some degree of self controlled thinking and an introduction to politics is kind of required... kind of - it works, it's not perfect and the age might IMO be a tad too high, but..

as far as insane goes - i'm not a big fan of the whole concept of insane, but that's not a discussion I feel is benefitial to go into now



Whose eyes are those eyes?
xplosys
19
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 5th Jan 2006
Playing: FPSC Multiplayer Games
Posted: 17th Jul 2013 00:51
The people you vote for are the people who make the rules concerning who gets to vote. Do you really think they want some kind of test? Do you think they want intelligent voters? Or is this one of those "in a perfect world" discussions.

Brian.

I am the underground.
Benjamin
22
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Nov 2002
Location: France
Posted: 17th Jul 2013 01:07
Quote: "You have to pass a test to drive a vehicle, so why not have the same for voting?"


It'd all work fine until the government only approves those who would vote for them.

"Sideboobs are awesome. Getting punched in the face is not." - Jerico2Day on violence and nudity
Quik
16
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 3rd Jul 2008
Location: Equestria!
Posted: 17th Jul 2013 01:29
driving a vehicle is directly dangerous to everyone around you though



Whose eyes are those eyes?

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2025-05-16 17:18:32
Your offset time is: 2025-05-16 17:18:32