I do agree with a lot of what you are saying Raven. I would have to say though that the fundamental point behind each of my posts has been to point out the fact that Halo is just a standard FPS, a well polished one yes, but still pretty stock standard. Which you seem to agree with.
Also to point out that those that preach that Halo is the best game going around, and that it is the first game to do this and that, are all just…well…wrong, their not in the know enough to make those kind of decisions, yet it is these same people that the publishing mobs and game developers are going to target. Its just business, you don’t target an audience of one thousand when you can have one of five hundred thousand.
I’m not saying that anyone here is motioning such things, just that I have heard many people saying things along those lines.
Imagine if the same amount of people that currently like Halo, instead liked games along the lines of pong or breakout(*tries not to make it sound like I’m bagging these games*), and they simply are unaware of any of the better games out there. Even if game publishing mobs and game developers were able to produce better titles they wouldn’t, they still will churn out pong/breakout type games because that’s what the majority of gamers want.
I guess this all has nothing really to do with what this topic was asking about, I guess it was just easy to use Halo as an example, but still nevertheless good healthy discussion.
Quote: "It's a well documented fact that magazines, newspapers, TV shows, radio, and other groups that review people are extremely bias in favor of public opinion, and they tend to follow the money around. If Edge went and ripped into Halo, how many readers would they lose?"
Took the words right out of my mouth Matt.
Quote: "Then you honestly don't know Edge..."
In all honesty I don't, the magazine was only published here in Australia for a few months back in 2004, so I have never read a copy. I used to read a lot of gaming magazines when I was younger (PC gamer, PC power-play etc etc) but for a multitude of reasons I no longer do (one of those reasons being what Matt was talking about)
If I can grab a quote from another forum post you did tha_rami, regarding StarCraft Brood war -
Quote: "I got it cracked, then loved it so much that I bought it. That's about my policy. Get it, like it, buy it. Get it, don't like it, drop it"
Quote: "Matt Rock - The product itself has to prove its value to me. "
I do basically the same thing tha_rami. This is in a way my process of reviewing a game, and one of the reasons why I don’t read gaming magazines anymore. I do sometimes head on over to IGN if there is a game title I have never heard about and are looking for some details.
Quote: "I actually buy games I've completed, yeah. Odd, isn't it? "
Not really, I do the same thing out of respect for the developers.
Edit: Why am I not surprised lol?
And about as silly as a bum full of smartys.
And yeah, I need a signature like I need a case of the crabs.